The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives
Open accessAbstract
The repair and regeneration of large bone defects resulting from disease or trauma remains a significant clinical challenge. Bioactive glass has appealing characteristics as a scaffold material for bone tissue engineering, but the application of glass scaffolds for the repair of load-bearing bone defects is often limited by their low mechanical strength and fracture toughness. This paper provides an overview of recent developments in the fabrication and mechanical properties of bioactive glass scaffolds. The review reveals the fact that mechanical strength is not a real limiting factor in the use of bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair, an observation not often recognized by most researchers and clinicians. Scaffolds with compressive strengths comparable to those of trabecular and cortical bones have been produced by a variety of methods. The current limitations of bioactive glass scaffolds include their low fracture toughness (low resistance to fracture) and limited mechanical reliability, which have so far received little attention. Future research directions should include the development of strong and tough bioactive glass scaffolds, and their evaluation in unloaded and load-bearing bone defects in animal models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Giannoudis, P. V., Dinopoulos, H., & Tsiridis, E. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029 · Cited by 2,078
Martin, R. B., Burr, D. B., Sharkey, N. A., & Fyhrie, D. P. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3002-9 · Cited by 1,159
Cited by
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192
Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells
Gao, C., Peng, S., Feng, P., & Shuai, C. (2017) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/boneres.2017.59 · Cited by 720
Calcium phosphate cements for bone substitution: Chemistry, handling and mechanical properties
Zhang, J., Liu, W., Schnitzler, V., Tancret, F., & Bouler, J.-M. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.001 · Cited by 667
Shahbazi, M.-A., Faghfouri, L., Ferreira, M. P. A., Figueiredo, P., Maleki, H., Sefat, F., Hirvonen, J., & Santos, H. A. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00283a · Cited by 523
Bone tissue engineering via growth factor delivery: from scaffolds to complex matrices
De Witte, T.-M., Fratila-Apachitei, L. E., Zadpoor, A. A., & Peppas, N. A. (2018) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rby013 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, Q., Saiz, E., Rahaman, M. N., & Tomsia, A. P.
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1245-1256
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073489944
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022
- The paper
- Fu, Q., Saiz, E., Rahaman, M. N., & Tomsia, A. P. (2011). Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. Materials Science and Engineering: C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.