The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone tissue engineering via growth factor delivery: from scaffolds to complex matrices
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, bone tissue engineering has emerged as a promising solution to the limitations of current gold standard treatment options for bone related-disorders such as bone grafts. Bone tissue engineering provides a scaffold design that mimics the extracellular matrix, providing an architecture that guides the natural bone regeneration process. During this period, a new generation of bone tissue engineering scaffolds has been designed and characterized that explores the incorporation of signaling molecules in order to enhance cell recruitment and ingress into the scaffold, as well as osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis, each of which is crucial to successful bone regeneration. Here, we outline and critically analyze key characteristics of successful bone tissue engineering scaffolds. We also explore candidate materials used to fabricate these scaffolds. Different growth factors involved in the highly coordinated process of bone repair are discussed, and the key requirements of a growth factor delivery system are described. Finally, we concentrate on an analysis of scaffold-based growth factor delivery strategies found in the recent literature. In particular, the incorporation of two-phase systems consisting of growth factor-loaded nanoparticles embedded into scaffolds shows great promise, both by providing sustained release over a therapeutically relevant timeframe and the potential to sequentially deliver multiple growth factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · Cited by 6,622
Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Role of Porosity and Pore Size
Loh, Q. L., & Choong, C. (2013) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 · Cited by 2,668
Bone Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and Challenges
Amini, A. R., Laurencin, C. T., & Nukavarapu, S. P. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v40.i5.10 · Cited by 2,336
Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering
Croisier, F., & Jérôme, C. (2013) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.12.009 · Cited by 2,149
Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing
Bose, S., Vahabzadeh, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2013) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 · Cited by 1,866
Lee, K., Silva, E. A., & Mooney, D. J. (2011) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2010.0223 · Cited by 1,386
Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives
Roseti, L., Parisi, V., Petretta, M., Cavallo, C., Desando, G., Bartolotti, I., & Grigolo, B. (2017) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017 · Cited by 1,320
Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Wu, S., Liu, X., Yeung, K. W. K., Liu, C., & Yang, X. (2014) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 · Cited by 1,159
Bose, S., & Tarafder, S. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.017 · Cited by 958
Scaffold Design for Bone Regeneration
Polo-Corrales, L., Latorre-Esteves, M., & Ramirez-Vick, J. E. (2014) · Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1166/jnn.2014.9127 · Cited by 945
Cited by
Natural and Synthetic Polymers for Bone Scaffolds Optimization
Donnaloja, F., Jacchetti, E., Soncini, M., & Raimondi, M. T. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12040905 · Cited by 324
Modern Trends for Peripheral Nerve Repair and Regeneration: Beyond the Hollow Nerve Guidance Conduit
Carvalho, C. R., Oliveira, J. M., & Reis, R. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00337 · Cited by 297
Mesenchymal stem cells: Amazing remedies for bone and cartilage defects
Kangari, P., Talaei-Khozani, T., Razeghian-Jahromi, I., & Razmkhah, M. (2020) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-020-02001-1 · Cited by 286
New perspectives: In-situ tissue engineering for bone repair scaffold
Cao, S., Zhao, Y., Hu, Y., Zou, L., & Chen, J. (2020) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108445 · Cited by 169
Xu, P., Kankala, R. K., Wang, S., & Chen, A. (2024) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbad107 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- De Witte, T.-M., Fratila-Apachitei, L. E., Zadpoor, A. A., & Peppas, N. A.
- Venue
- Regenerative Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-06-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 197-211
- ISSN
- 2056-3418 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-3426
- OpenAlex
- W2807971858
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 21.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone tissue engineering via growth factor delivery: from scaffolds to complex matrices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rb/rby013
- The paper
- De Witte, T.-M., Fratila-Apachitei, L. E., Zadpoor, A. A., & Peppas, N. A. (2018). Bone tissue engineering via growth factor delivery: from scaffolds to complex matrices. Regenerative Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rby013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.