Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel high-strength, low-alloys Zn-Mg (< 0.1 wt% Mg) and their arterial biodegradation

Open access
Jin, Hualan, Zhao, Shan, Guillory, Roger, Bowen, Patrick K., Yin, Zhiyong, Griebel, Adam, Schaffer, Jeremy, Earley, Elisha J., Goldman, Jeremy, Drelich, Jaroslaw W.·2018·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Abstract

It is still an open challenge to find a biodegradable metallic material exhibiting sufficient mechanical properties and degradation behavior to serve as an arterial stent. In this study, Zn-Mg alloys of 0.002 (Zn-002Mg), 0.005 (Zn-005Mg) and 0.08 wt% Mg (Zn-08Mg) content were cast, extruded and drawn to 0.25 mm diameter, and evaluated as potential biodegradable stent materials. Structural analysis confirmed formation of Mg2Zn11 intermetallic in all three alloys with the average grain size decreasing with increasing Mg content. Tensile testing, fractography analysis and micro hardness measurements showed the best integration of strength, ductility and hardness for the Zn-08Mg alloy. Yield strength, tensile strength, and elongation to failure values of >200–300 MPa, >300–400 MPa, and >30% respectively, were recorded for Zn-08Mg. This metal appears to be the first formulated biodegradable material that satisfies benchmark values desirable for endovascular stenting. Unfortunately, the alloy reveals signs of age hardening and strain rate sensitivity, which need to be addressed before using this metal for stenting. The explants of Zn-08Mg alloy residing in the abdominal aorta of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats for 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6 and 11 months demonstrated similar, yet slightly elevated inflammation and neointimal activation for the alloy relative to what was recently reported for pure zinc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.021

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Jin, H., Zhao, S., Guillory, R., Bowen, P. K., Yin, Z., Griebel, A., Schaffer, J., Earley, E. J., Goldman, J., & Drelich, J. W.
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
84
Pages
67-79
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768779222
Cited by
271
References
1
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel high-strength, low-alloys Zn-Mg (< 0.1 wt% Mg) and their arterial biodegradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.021
The paper
Jin, H., Zhao, S., Guillory, R., Bowen, P. K., Yin, Z., Griebel, A., Schaffer, J., Earley, E. J., Goldman, J., & Drelich, J. W. (2018). Novel high-strength, low-alloys Zn-Mg (< 0.1 wt% Mg) and their arterial biodegradation. Materials Science and Engineering: C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.