Cited by 82Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone Tissue Engineering Materials3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Enhanced decellularization technique of porcine dermal ECM for tissue engineering applications

Ventura, Reiza D., Padalhin, Andrew R., Park, Chan Mi, Lee, Byong Taek·2019·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Abstract

Effective removal of cellular components while retaining extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins is the ultimate goal of decellularization. The aim of this study is to produce a decellularized ECM with highly preserved ECM proteins and to determine the effect of isopropanol as a decellularization solvent on the characteristics of the decellularized porcine skin. Two different protocols were used for porcine skin decellularization. Protocol 1 consisted of Triton-X and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in water while protocol 2 consisted of Triton-X and SDS in 70% isopropanol. After decellularization, DNA components decreased significantly in protocol 2 with lower amount of lipid content and higher ECM proteins such as collagen (92.91 ± 9.02 μg/mg sample), α-elastin (142.32 ± 6.74 μg/mg sample) and sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG; 7.44 ± 1.30 μg/mg sample) compared with protocol 1 ECM. Higher amount of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; 11.26 ± 0.44 pg/mg sample) content was quantified in protocol 2 compared with protocol 1 while higher trace amount of bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2; 0.28 ± 0.04 pg/mg sample) was also observed in protocol 2 compared with protocol 1. Protocol 2 ECM did not significantly affect the cell viability and exhibited no cytotoxicity when exposed to three different cell lines: L929 fibroblast cells, MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells, and rat mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC). Subcutaneous implantation after 7 and 21 days revealed higher cell infiltration in protocol 2 ECM and enhanced neovascularization. Isopropanol/surfactants proved to be effective in cell and lipid removal during decellularization while preserving the higher amount of ECM proteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109841

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ventura, R. D., Padalhin, A. R., Park, C. M., & Lee, B. T.
Affiliations
Soonchunhyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Byong Taek
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
104
Pages
109841
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954766746
Cited by
82
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education (2015R1A6A1A03032522)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Soonchunhyang University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
decellularization, porcine skin, extracellular matrix, isopropanol, Triton X-100, sodium dodecyl sulfate, collagen, alpha-elastin, glycosaminoglycans, vascular endothelial growth factor, BMP-2, cytocompatibility, mesenchymal stem cells, neovascularization, tissue engineering scaffolds
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Collagen, DNA, Extracellular Matrix, Glycosaminoglycans, Rabbits, Swine, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Dermis, Tissue Engineering, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review