The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration
Open accessAbstract
To induce bone regeneration there is a complex cascade of growth factors. Growth factors such as recombinant BMP-2, BMP-7, and PDGF are FDA-approved therapies in bone regeneration. Although, BMP shows promising results as being an alternative to autograft, it also has its own downfalls. BMP-2 has many adverse effects such as inflammatory complications such as massive soft-tissue swelling that can compromise a patient’s airway, ectopic bone formation, and tumor formation. BMP-2 may also be advantageous for patients not willing to give up smoking as it shows bone regeneration success with smokers. BMP-7 is no longer an option for bone regeneration as it has withdrawn off the market. PDGF-BB grafts in studies have shown PDGF had similar fusion rates to autologous grafts and fewer adverse effects. There is also an FDA-approved bioactive molecule for bone regeneration, a peptide P-15. P-15 was found to be effective, safe, and have similar outcomes to autograft at 2 years post-op for cervical radiculopathy due to cervical degenerative disc disease. Growth factors and bioactive molecules show some promising results in bone regeneration, although more research is needed to avoid their adverse effects and learn about the long-term effects of these therapies. There is a need of a bone regeneration method of similar quality of an autograft that is osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic. This review covers all FDA-approved bone regeneration therapies such as the “gold standard” autografts, allografts, synthetic bone grafts, and the newer growth factors/bioactive molecules. It also covers international bone grafts not yet approved in the United States and upcoming technologies in bone grafts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Zhang, M., Yu, W., Niibe, K., Zhang, W., Egusa, H., Tang, T., & Jiang, X. (2018) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2018/3272098 · Cited by 95
RetractedThe biology of VEGF and its receptors
Ferrara, N., Gerber, H.-P., & LeCouter, J. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0603-669 · Cited by 9,591
Liao, J., Wei, Q., Zou, Y., Fan, J., Song, D., Cui, J., Zhang, W., Zhu, Y., Ma, C., Hu, X., et al. (2017) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000471945 · Cited by 2,742
The Economic Costs of Pain in the United States
Gaskin, D. J., & Richard, P. (2012) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009 · Cited by 2,359
Giannoudis, P. V., Dinopoulos, H., & Tsiridis, E. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029 · Cited by 2,078
Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review
Wang, W., & Yeung, K. W. K. (2017) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 · Cited by 1,938
Principles of Tissue Engineering
(2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2011-0-07193-4 · Cited by 1,906
Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions
Einhorn, T. A., & Gerstenfeld, L. C. (2015) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.164 · Cited by 1,807
TGF-β and BMP Signaling in Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation
Chen, G., Deng, C., & Li, Y.-P. (2012) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.2929 · Cited by 1,756
Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration
T., A., & C., J. (2001) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s005860100282 · Cited by 1,751
Cited by
Xiong, Y., Mi, B.-B., Lin, Z., Hu, Y.-Q., Yu, L., Zha, K.-K., Panayi, A. C., Yu, T., Chen, L., Liu, Z.-P., et al. (2022) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-022-00426-8 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillman, C. E., & Jayasuriya, A. C.
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 112466
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3203925940
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466
- The paper
- Gillman, C. E., & Jayasuriya, A. C. (2021). FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering: C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.