CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 202Multiferroics and related materialsFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsDielectric materials and actuators

Magnetoelectric effect: principles and applications in biology and medicine– a review

Open access
Kopyl, S., Surmenev, R., Surmeneva, M., Fetisov, Y., Kholkin, A.·2021·Materials Today Bio
DOI 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100149PMC PMC8554634
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Magnetoelectric (ME) effect experimentally discovered about 60 years ago remains one of the promising research fields with the main applications in microelectronics and sensors. However, its applications to biology and medicine are still in their infancy. For the diagnosis and treatment of diseases at the intracellular level, it is necessary to develop a maximally non-invasive way of local stimulation of individual neurons, navigation, and distribution of biomolecules in damaged cells with relatively high efficiency and adequate spatial and temporal resolution. Recently developed ME materials (composites), which combine elastically coupled piezoelectric (PE) and magnetostrictive (MS) phases, have been shown to yield very strong ME effects even at room temperature. This makes them a promising toolbox for solving many problems of modern medicine. The main ME materials, processing technologies, as well as most prospective biomedical applications will be overviewed, and modern trends in using ME materials for future therapies, wireless power transfer, and optogenetics will be considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100149

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The magnetostrictive material responds to magnetic fields by changing shape or dimensions.

    “The piezoelectric component generates an electric field in response to mechanical stress, while the magnetostrictive material responds to magnetic fields by changing shape or dimensions (Yu et al., 2020; Kopyl et al., 2021).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Kopyl et al., 2021

  • The magnetoelectric effect is where magnetic fields can induce electric fields in certain materials, and vice versa.

    “This approach uses the magnetoelectric effect where magnetic fields can induce electric fields in certain materials, and vice versa (Kopyl et al., 2021).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Kopyl et al., 2021

  • The piezoelectric component of an ME transducer generates an electric field in response to mechanical stress.

    “The piezoelectric component generates an electric field in response to mechanical stress, while the magnetostrictive material responds to magnetic fields by changing shape or dimensions (Yu et al., 2020; Kopyl et al., 2021).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Kopyl et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 231 · Cited by 202

Research works printed but not linked: 213

  1. [1]Palneedi H. Annapureddy V. Priya S. Ryu J. Status and perspectives of multiferroic magnetoelectric composite materials and applications Actuators 5 2016 9 10.3390/act5010009 · DOI
  2. [2]Prabhakaran T. Hemalatha J. Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based magnetoelectric polymer nanocomposite films Lanceros-Mendez S. Martins P. Magnetoelectric Polymer-Based Composites: Fundamentals and Applications 2017 Wiley 10.1002/9783527801336.ch3c · DOI
  3. [3]Mundy J. Brooks C. Holtz M. … Schlom D.G. Atomically engineered ferroic layers yield a room-temperature magnetoelectric multiferroic Nature 537 2016 523 527 10.1038/nature19343 27652564 · DOI
  4. [4]Cheong S.W. Mostovoy M. Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity Nat. Mater. 6 2007 13 20 10.1038/nmat1804 17199121 · DOI
  5. [5]Wang Y. Li J. Viehland D. Magnetoelectrics for magnetic sensor applications: status, challenges and perspectives Mater. Today 17 2014 269 275 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.05.004 · DOI
  6. [6]Cheng Y. Peng B. Hu Z. Zhou Z. Liu M. Recent development and status of magnetoelectric materials and devices Phys. Lett. 382 2018 3018 3025 10.1016/j.physleta.2018.07.014 · DOI
  7. [7]Liang X. Chen H. Sun N.X. Magnetoelectric materials and devices Apl. Mater. 9 2021 41114 10.1063/5.0044532 · DOI
  8. [8]Spaldin N.A. Ramesh R. Advances in magnetoelectric multiferroics Nat. Mater. 18 2019 203 212 10.1038/s41563-018-0275-2 30783227 · DOI
  9. [9]Gao J. Jiang Z. Zhang S. Mao Z. Shen Y. Chu Z. Review of magnetoelectric sensors Actuators 10 2021 109 10.3390/act10060109 · DOI
  10. [11]Chen H. Liang X. Dong C. He Y. Sun N. Zaeimbashi M. He Y. Gao Y. Parimi P.V. Lin H. Sun N.-X. Ultra-compact mechanical antennas Appl. Phys. Lett. 117 2020 170501 10.1063/5.0025362 · DOI
  11. [12]Kemp M.A. Franzi M. Haase A. Jongewaard E. Whittaker M.T. Kirkpatrick M. Sparr R. A high Q piezoelectric resonator as a portable VLF transmitter Nat. Commun. 10 2019 1715 10.1038/s41467-019-09680-2 30979897 PMC6461683 · DOI
  12. [13]Pereira N. Lima A.C. Correia V. Perinka N. Lanceros-Mendez S. Martins P. Magnetic proximity sensor based on magnetoelectric composites and printed coils Materials 13 2020 1729 10.3390/ma13071729 PMC7212752 32272728 · DOI
  13. [14]Vidal J.V. Turutin A.V. Kubasov I.V. Kislyuk A.M. Kiselev D.A. Malinkovich M.D. Parkhomenko Y.N. Kobeleva S.P. Sobolev N.A. Kholkin A.L. Dual vibration and magnetic energy harvesting with bidomain LiNbO3-based composite IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 67 2020 1219 1229 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.2967842 31985416 · DOI
  14. [15]Tiana Z. Xu L. Gao Y. Yuan S. Xia Z. Magnetic memory effect at room temperature in exchange coupled NiFe2O4-NiO nanogranular system Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 2017 182406 10.1063/1.4997518 · DOI
  15. [16]Scott J. Room-temperature multiferroic magnetoelectrics NPG Asia Mater. 5 2013 e72 10.1038/am.2013.58 · DOI
  16. [17]Hitchins D. Natural systems engineering Aiguier M. Boulanger F. Krob D. Marchal C. Complex Systems Design & Management 2014 Springer Cham 315 334 10.1007/978-3-319-02812-5_23 · DOI
  17. [18]Shamoon D. Lasquellec S. Brosseau C. Perspective: towards understanding the multiscale description of cells and tissues by electromechanobiology featured J. Appl. Phys. 123 2018 240902 10.1063/1.5018723 · DOI
  18. [19]Marracino P. Havelka D. Prusa J. Liberti M. Tuszynski J. Ayoub A.T. Apollonio F. Cifra M. Tubulin response to intense nanosecond-scale electric field in molecular dynamics simulation Sci. Rep. 9 2019 10477 10.1038/s41598-019-46636-4 31324834 PMC6642143 · DOI
  19. [20]Jahns R. Knochel R. Greve H. Woltermann E. Lage E. Quandt E. Magnetoelectric sensors for biomagnetic measurements 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications 2011 107 110 10.1109/MeMeA.2011.5966676 · DOI
  20. [21]Viehland D. Wuttig M. McCord J. Quandt E. Magnetoelectric magnetic field sensors MRS Bull. 43 2018 834 840 10.1557/mrs.2018.261 · DOI
  21. [22]Özden M.O. Teplyuk A. Gümüs O. Meyners D. Höft M. Gerken M. Magnetoelectric cantilever sensors under inhomogeneous magnetic field excitation AIP Adv. 10 2020 25132 10.1063/1.5136239 · DOI
  22. [23]Murzin D. Mapps D.J. Levada K. Belyaev V. Omelyanchik A. Panina L. Rodionova V. Ultrasensitive magnetic field sensors for biomedical applications Sensors 20 2020 1569 10.3390/s20061569 PMC7146409 32168981 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [24]Tikhonova S.A. Evdokimov P.V. Filippov Y.Y. Safronova T.V. Garshev A.V. Shcherbakov I.M. Dubrov V.E. Putlyaev V.I. Electro- and magnetoactive materials in medicine: a review of existing and potential areas of application Inorg. Mater. 56 2020 1319 1337 10.1134/S0020168520130038 · DOI
  24. [26]Schmid H. Some symmetry aspects of ferroics and single phase multiferroics J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20 2008 434201 10.1088/0953-8984/20/43/43420 · DOI
  25. [28]Folen V.J. Rado G.T. Stalder E.W. Anisotropy of the magnetoelectric effect in Cr2O3 Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 1961 607 608 10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.607 · DOI
  26. [29]Eerenstein W. Mathur N.D. Scott J.F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials Nature 442 2006 759 10.1038/nature05023 16915279 · DOI
  27. [30]Popov Y.F. Kadomtseva A.M. Vorob’ev G.P. Zvezdin A.K. Discovery of the linear magnetoelectric effect in magnetic ferroelectric BiFeO3 in a strong magnetic field Ferroelectrics 162 1994 135 140 10.1080/00150199408245098 · DOI
  28. [31]Van Den Boomgaard J. Terrell D.R. Born R.A.J. Giller H.F.J.I. An in situ grown eutectic magnetoelectric composite material J. Mater. Sci. 9 1974 1705 1709 10.1007/BF00540770 · DOI
  29. [33]Newnham R.E. Skinner D.P. Cross L.E. Connectivity and piezoelectric-pyroelectric composites Mater. Res. Bull. 13 1978 525 536 10.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-7 · DOI
  30. [34]Corral-Flores V. Bueno-Baques D. Carillo-Flores D. Matutes-Aquino J.A. Enhanced magnetoelectric effect in core-shell particulate composites J. Appl. Phys. 99 2006 81503 10.1063/1.2165147 · DOI
  31. [35]Sreenivasulu G. Popov M. Chavez F.A. Hamilton S.L. Lehto P.R. Srinivasan G. Controlled self-assembly of multiferroic core-shell nanoparticles exhibiting strong magneto-electric effects Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 2014 52901 10.1063/1.4863690 · DOI
  32. [36]Bichurin M.L. Fillipov D.A. Petrov V.M. Laletsin V.M. Srinivasan G. Resonance magnetoelectric effects in layered magnetostrictive-piezoelectric composites Phys. Rev. 68 2003 132408 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.132408 · DOI
  33. [37]Pereira N. Lima A.C. Lanceros-Mendez S. Martins P. Magnetoelectrics: three centuries of research heading towards the 4.0 industrial revolution Materials 13 2020 4033 10.3390/ma13184033 PMC7558578 32932903 · DOI
  34. [38]Saveliev D. Chashin D. Fetisov L. Shamonin M. Fetisov Y. Ceramic-heterostructure-based magnetoelectric voltage transformer with an adjustable transformation ratio Materials 13 2020 3981 10.3390/ma13183981 PMC7558338 32916785 · DOI
  35. [39]Narita F. Fox M. A review of piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, and magnetoelectric materials and device technologies for energy harvesting applications Adv. Eng. Mater. 20 2017 1700743 10.1002/adem.201700743 · DOI
  36. [40]Srinivasan G. Fetisov Y.K. Microwave magnetoelectric effects and signal processing devices Integr. Ferroelectr. 83 2005 89 98 10.1080/10584580600949105 · DOI
  37. [41]Kleemann W. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric nanocomposites for data processing J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 50 2017 223001 10.1088/1361-6463/aa6c04 · DOI
  38. [42]Reenmann J. Durdaut P. Salzer S. Demming T. Piorra A. Quandt E. Frey N. Hoft M. Schmidt G. Evaluation of magnetoelectric sensor systems for cardiological applications Measurement 116 2018 230 238 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.09.047 · DOI
  39. [43]Khatua C. Bhattacharya D. Krishna Balla V. In situ electrical stimulation for enhanced bone growth: a minireview Med Devices Sens 3 2020 e10090 10.1002/mds3.10090 · DOI
  40. [44]Zheng T. Yue Z. Wallace G.G. Du Y. Martins P. Lanceros-Mendez S. J Higgins M. Local probing of magnetoelectric properties of PVDF/Fe3O4 electrospun nanofibers by piezoresponse force microscopy Nanotechnology 28 2017 65707 10.1088/1361-6528/aa5217 28059063 · DOI
  41. [45]Kapat K. Shubhra Quazi T.H. Zhou M. Leeuwenburgh S. Piezoelectric nano-biomaterials for biomedicine and tissue regeneration Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 2020 1909045 10.1002/adfm.201909045 · DOI
  42. [46]Zhang X. Li L. Ouyang J. Zhang L. Xue J. Zhang H. Tao W. Electroactive electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering Nano Today 39 2021 101196 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101196 · DOI
  43. [47]Ribeiro C. Correia V. Martins P. Gama F.M. Lanceros-Mendez S. Proving the suitability of magnetoelectric stimuli for tissue engineering applications Colloids Surf., B 140 2016 430 436 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.055 26797659 · DOI
  44. [48]Ferson N.D. Uhl A.M. Andrew J.S. Piezoelectric and magnetoelectric scaffolds for tissue regeneration and biomedicine: a review IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectrics Freq. Control 68 2021 229 241 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3020283 32866097 · DOI
  45. [49]Zhai J. Dong S. Xing Z. Li J. Viehland D. Giant magnetoelectric effect in metglas/polyvinylidene-fluoride laminates Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 2006 83507 10.1063/1.2337996 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [50]Díaz E. Valle B. Ribeiro S. Lanceros-Mendez S. Manuel Barandiarán J. Development of magnetically active scaffolds for bone regeneration Nanomaterials 8 2018 678 10.3390/nano8090678 PMC6163623 30200267 · DOI
  47. [51]Ribeiro S. Ribeiro C. Carvalho E.O. Tubio C.R. Castro N. Pereira N. Correia V. Gomes A.C. Lanceros-Méndez S. Magnetically activated electroactive microenvironments for skeletal muscle tissue regeneration ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 3 2020 4239 4252 10.1021/acsabm.0c00315 35025425 · DOI
  48. [52]Shuai C. Yang W. He C. Peng S. Gao C. Yang Y. Qi F. Feng P. A magnetic micro-environment in scaffolds for stimulating bone regeneration Mater. Des. 185 2020 108275 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108275 · DOI
  49. [53]Reizabal A. Brito-Pereira R. Fernandes M.M. Castro N. Correia V. Ribeiro C. Costa C.M. Perez L. Vilas J.L. Lanceros-Méndez S. Silk fibroin magnetoactive nanocomposite films and membranes for dynamic bone tissue engineering strategies Materialia 12 2020 100709 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100709 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [54]Abzan N. Kharaziha M. Labbaf S. Development of three-dimensional piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride-graphene oxide scaffold by non-solvent induced phase separation method for nerve tissue engineering Mater. Des. 167 2019 107636 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107636 · DOI
  51. [55]Kozielski K.L. Jahanshahi A. Gilbert H.B. Yu Y. Erin Ö. Francisco D. Alosaimi F. Temel Y. Sitti M. Nonresonant powering of injectable nanoelectrodes enables wireless deep brain stimulation in freely moving mice Sci. Adv. 7 2021 eabc4189 10.1126/sciadv.abc4189 33523872 PMC7806222 · DOI
  52. [57]Martins P. Lanceros-Mendez S. Polymer-based magnetoelectric materials Adv. Funct. Mater. 23 2013 3371 3385 10.1002/adfm.201202780 · DOI
  53. [58]Malleron K. Gensbittel A. Talleb H. Ren Z. Experimental study of magnetoelectric transducers for power supply of small biomedical devices Microelectron. Eng. 88 2019 184 189 10.1016/j.mejo.2018.01.013 · DOI
  54. [59]Agarwal K. Jegadeesan R. Guo Y.X. Thakor N.V. Wireless power transfer strategies for implantable bioelectronics IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10 2017 136 161 10.1109/RBME.2017.2683520 28328511 · DOI
  55. [60]Hermenegildo B. Ribeiro C. Pérez-Álvarez L. Vilas J.L. Learmonth D.A. Sousa R.A. Martins P. Lanceros-Méndez S. Hydrogel-based magnetoelectric microenvironments for tissue stimulation Colloids Surf., B 181 2019 1041 1047 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.023 31382332 · DOI
  56. [61]Carvalho E.O. Ribeiro C. Correia D.M. Botelho G. Lanceros-Mendez S. Biodegradable hydrogels loaded with magnetically responsive microspheres as 2D and 3D scaffolds Nanomaterials 10 2020 2421 10.3390/nano10122421 PMC7761810 33287454 · DOI
  57. [62]Khatua C. Bhattacharya D. Kundu B. Krishna Balla V. Bodhak S. Goswami S. Multiferroic reinforced bioactive glass composites for bone tissue engineering applications Adv. Eng. Mater. 20 2018 1800329 10.1002/adem.201800329 · DOI
  58. [63]Yu Z. Chen J.C. Alrashdan F.T. Avants B.W. He Y. Singer A. Robinson J.T. Yang K. MagNI: a magnetoelectrically powered and controlled wireless neurostimulating implant IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits. Syst. 14 2020 1241 1252 10.1109/TBCAS.2020.3037862 33180732 PMC8712272 · DOI
  59. [64]Tang B. Shen X. Yang Y. Xu Z. Yi J. Yao Y. Cao M. Zhang Y. Xia H. Enhanced cellular osteogenic differentiation on CoFe2O4/P(VDF-TrFE) nanocomposite coatings under static magnetic field Colloids Surf., B 198 2021 111473 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111473 33250417 · DOI
  60. [65]Omelyanchik A. Antipova V. Gritsenko C. Kolesnikova V. Murzin D. Han Y. Turutin A.V. Kubasov I.V. Kislyuk A.M. Ilina T.S. Kiselev D.A. Voronova M. Malinkovich M.D. Parkhomenko Y.N. Silibin M. Kozlova E.N. Peddis D. Levada K. Makarova L. Amirov A. Rodionova V. Boosting magnetoelectric effect in polymer-based nanocomposites Nanomaterials 11 5 2021 1154 10.3390/nano11051154 33925105 PMC8146360 · DOI
  61. [66]Shuai C. Yang W. Peng S. Gao C. Guo W. Lai Y. Feng P. Physical stimulations and their osteogenesis-inducing mechanisms Int. J. Bioprint. 4 2018 138 158 10.18063/IJB.v4i2.138 33102916 PMC7581999 · DOI
  62. [67]Naveed-Ul-Haq M. Shvartsman V.V. Constantinescu G. Trivedi H. Salamon S. Landers J. Wende H. Lupascu D.C. Effect of Al3+ modification on cobalt ferrite and its impact on the magnetoelectric effect in BCZT–CFO multiferroic composites J. Mater. Sci. 52 2017 13402 13413 10.1007/s10853-017-1444-4 · DOI
  63. [68]Zong Y. Yue Z. Martins P. Zhuang J. Du Y. Lanceros-Mendez S. Higgins M.J. Magnetoelectric coupling in nanoscale 0-1 connectivity Nanoscale 10 2018 17370 17377 10.1039/C8NR05182H 30203827 · DOI
  64. [69]Backman G. Lawton B. Morley N.A. Magnetostrictive energy harvesting: materials and design study IEEE Trans. Magn. 55 2019 4700206 10.1109/TMAG.2019.2891118 · DOI
  65. [70]Praveen P.J. Monaji V.R. Kumar S.D. Subramanian V. Das D. Enhanced magnetoelectric response from lead-free (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.1Ti0.9)O3 – CoFe2O4 laminate and particulate composites Ceram. Int. 44 2018 4298 4306 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.018 · DOI
  66. [71]Rani J. Kushwaha V.K. Patel P.K. Tomy C.V. Exploring magnetoelectric coupling in trilayer [Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3-0.5(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3]/CoFe2O4/[Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3- 0.5(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3] thin film J. Alloys Compd. 863 2021 157702 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157702 · DOI
  67. [72]Wang J. Zhang Y. Sahoo M.P.K. Shimada T. Kitamura T. Ghosez P. Zhang T.-Y. Giant magnetoelectric effect at the graphone/ferroelectric interface Sci. Rep. 8 2018 12448 10.1038/s41598-018-30010-x 30127515 PMC6102284 · DOI
  68. [73]Reddy I.R. Oppeneer P.M. Tarafder K. Route to achieving giant magnetoelectric coupling in BaTiO3/Sr2CoO3F perovskite heterostructures Phys. Rev. B 98 2018 140401 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.140401 R · DOI
  69. [74]McGary P.D. Stadler B.J.H. Electrochemical deposition of Fe1−xGax nanowire arrays J. Appl. Phys. 97 2005 10R503 10.1063/1.1851435 · DOI
  70. [75]He Y. Jiang C. Wu W. Wang B. Duan H. Wang H. Zhang T. Wang J. Liu J. Zhang Z. Stamenov P. Coey J.M.D. Xu H. Giant heterogeneous magnetostriction in FeeGa alloys: effect of trace element doping Acta Mater. 109 2016 177 186 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.056 · DOI
  71. [76]He Y. Ke X. Jiang C. Miao N. Wang H. Coey J.M.D. Wang Y. Xu H. Interaction of trace rare-Earth dopants and nanoheterogeneitiesinduces giant magnetostriction in Fe-Ga alloys Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 2018 1800858 1800859 10.1002/adfm.201800858 · DOI
  72. [77]Clark A.E. Restorff J.B. Wun-Fogle M. Lograsso T.A. Schlagel D.L. Magnetostrictive properties of body-centered cubic Fe-Ga and Fe-Ga-Al alloys IEEE Trans. Magn. 36 2000 3238 3240 10.1109/20.908752 · DOI
  73. [78]Ruffoni M.P. Pascarelli S. Grössinger R. Sato Turtelli R. Bormio-Nunes C. Pettifer R.F. Direct measurement of intrinsic atomic scale magnetostriction Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 2008 147202 147204 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.147202 18851565 · DOI
  74. [79]Flatau A.B. Stadler B.J.H. Park J. Sai Madhukar Reddy K. Downey P.R. Mudivarthi C. Van Order M. Magnetostrictive Fe-Ga Nanowires for actuation and sensing applications Vázquez M. Magnetic Nano- and Microwires. Design, Synthesis, Properties and Applications second ed. 2020 Elsevier 737 776
  75. [80]Pateras A. Harder R. Manna S. Kiefer B. Sandberg R.L. Trugman S. Kim J.W. de la Venta J. Fullerton E.E. Shpyrko O.G. Fohtung E. Room temperature giant magnetostriction insingle-crystal nickel nanowires NPG Asia Mater. 11 2019 59 10.1038/s41427-019-0160-8 · DOI
  76. [81]Ribeiro C. Sencadas V. Correia D.M. Lanceros-Méndez S. Piezoelectric polymers as biomaterials for tissue engineering applications Colloids Surf., B 136 2015 46 55 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.043 26355812 · DOI
  77. [82]Minary-Jolandan M. Yu M.-F. Uncovering nanoscale electromechanical heterogeneity in the subfibrillar structure of collagen fibrils responsible for the piezoelectricity of bone ACS Nano 3 2009 1859 1863 10.1021/nn900472n 19505115 · DOI
  78. [83]Fukada E. Yasuda I. On the piezoelectric effect of bone J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12 1957 1158 1162 10.1143/JPSJ.12.1158 · DOI
  79. [84]Fukada E. Yasuda I. Piezoelectric effects in collagen Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 3 1964 117 121 10.1143/JJAP.3.117 · DOI
  80. [85]Koppes A.N. Seggio A.M. Thompson D.M. Neurite outgrowth is significantly increased by the simultaneous presentation of schwann cells and moderate exogenous electric fields J. Neural. Eng. 8 2011 46023 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046023 21712572 · DOI
  81. [86]Green R. Abidian M.R. Conducting polymers for neural prosthetic and neural interface applications Adv. Mater. 27 2015 7620 7637 10.1002/adma.201501810 26414302 PMC4681501 · DOI
  82. [87]Fernandes M.M. Correia D.M. Ribeiro C. Castro N. Correia V. Lanceros-Mendez S. Bioinspired three-dimensional magnetoactive scaffolds for bone tissue engineering ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 2019 45265 45275 10.1021/acsami.9b14001 31682095 · DOI
  83. [88]Surmenev R.A. Orlova T. Chernozem R.V. Ivanova A.A. Bartasyte A. Mathur S. Surmeneva M.A. Hybrid lead-free polymer-based nanocomposites with improved piezoelectric response for biomedical energy-harvesting applications: a review Nano Energy 62 2019 475 506 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.090 · DOI
  84. [89]Mavčič B. Antolič V. Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy Int. Orthop. 36 2012 689 695 10.1007/s00264-012-1487-8 22302177 PMC3311788 · DOI
  85. [90]Sarkar D. Chu M.-C. Cho S.-J. Ceramic - polymer nanocomposite: alternate choice of bone J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 45 2008 309 319 10.4191/kcers.2008.45.6.309 · DOI
  86. [91]Zhao M. Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20 2009 674 682 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.009 19146969 · DOI
  87. [92]Woo D.G. Shim M.S. Park J.S. Yang H.N. Lee D.R. Park K.H. The effect of electrical stimulation on the differentiation of hESCs adhered onto fibronectin-coated gold nanoparticles Biomaterials 30 2009 5631 5638 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.026 19651437 · DOI
  88. [93]Schwartz Z. Simon B.J. Duran M.A. Barabino G. Chaudhri R. Boyan B.D. Pulsed electromagnetic fields enhance BMP-2 dependent osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells J. Orthop. Res. 26 2008 1250 1255 10.1002/jor.20591 18404656 · DOI
  89. [94]Meng S. Rouabhia M. Zhang Z. Electrical stimulation modulates osteoblast proliferation and bone protein production through heparin-bioactivated conductive scaffolds Bioelectromagnetics 34 2013 189 199 10.1002/bem.21766 23124591 · DOI
  90. [95]Tofail S.A.M. Bauer J. Electrically polarized biomaterials Adv. Mater. 28 2016 5470 5484 10.1002/adma.201505403 27122372 · DOI
  91. [96]Amaro L. Correia D.M. Martins P.M. Botelho G. Carabineiro S.A.C. Ribeiro C. Lanceros-Mendez S. Morphology dependence degradation of electro- and magnetoactive poly(3-hydroxybutyrateco-hydroxyvalerate) for tissue engineering applications Polymers 12 2020 953 10.3390/polym12040953 PMC7240521 32325963 · DOI
  92. [97]Ribeiro C. Correia D.M. Ribeiro S. Fernandes M.M. Lanceros-Mendez S. Piezo- and magnetoelectric polymers as biomaterials for novel tissue engineering strategies MRS Adv. 3 2018 1671 1676 10.1557/adv.2018.223 · DOI
  93. [98]Esmaeili E. Soleimani M. Adel Ghiass M. Hatamie S. Vakilian S. Soufi Zomorrod M. Sadeghzadeh N. Vossoughi M. Hosseinzadeh S. Magnetoelectric nanocomposite scaffold for high yield differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to neural-like cells J. Cell. Physiol. 234 2019 13617 13628 10.1002/jcp.28040 30613971 PMC13483200 · DOI
  94. [99]Rizzo G. Loyau V. Nocua R. Christophe Lourme J. Lefeuvre E. Potentiality of magnetoelectric composites for Wireless Power Transmission in medical implants 13th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT) 2019 18813511 10.1109/ISMICT.2019.8743873 · DOI
  95. [100]Liu Y. Zhang X. Cao C. Zhang Y. Wei J. Li Y.j. Liang W. Hu Z. Zhang J. Wei Y. Deng X. Built-in electric fields dramatically induce enhancement of osseointegration Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 2017 1703771 10.1002/adfm.201703771 · DOI
  96. [101]Ribeiro C. Pärssinen J. Sencadas V. Correia V. Miettinen S. P Hytönen V. Lanceros-Méndez S. Dynamic piezoelectric stimulation enhances osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 103 2015 2172 2175 10.1002/jbm.a.35368 25370596 · DOI
  97. [102]Liu B. Chen L. Shao C. Zhang F. Zhou K. Cao J. Zhang D. Improved osteoblasts growth on osteomimetic hydroxyapatite/BaTiO3 composites with aligned lamellar porous structure Mater. Sci. Eng. C 61 2016 8 14 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.009 26838817 · DOI
  98. [103]Surmenev R.A. Chernozem R.V. Pariy I.O. Surmeneva M.A. A review on piezo- and pyroelectric responses of flexible nano- and micropatterned polymer surfaces for biomedical sensing and energy harvesting applications Nano Energy 79 2021 105442 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105442 · DOI
  99. [104]Damaraju S.M. Shen Y. Elele E. Khusid B. Eshghinejad A. Li J. Jaffe M. Livingston Arinzeh T. Three-dimensional piezoelectric fibrous scaffolds selectively promote mesenchymal stem cell differentiation Biomaterials 149 2017 51 62 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.024 28992510 · DOI
  100. [105]Genchi G.G. Sinibaldi E. Ceseracciu L. Labardi M. Marino A. Marras S. De Simoni G. Mattoli V. Ciofani G. Ultrasound-activated piezoelectric P (VDF-TrFE)/boron nitride nanotube composite films promote differentiation of human SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 14 2018 2421 2432 10.1016/j.nano.2017.05.006 28552646 · DOI
  101. [106]Huang H.M. Lee S.Y. Yao W.C. Lin C.T. Yeh C.Y. Static magnetic fields upregulate osteoblast maturity by affecting local differentiation factors Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 447 2006 201 208 10.1097/01.blo.0000203464.35561.be 16456312 · DOI
  102. [107]Yue Z. Qi Y. Yang M. Zhan X. Fang L. Jing H. Gu Z. Wu Y. Protein corona of magnetic hydroxyapatite scaffold improves cell proliferation via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway ACS Nano 11 2017 3690 3704 10.1021/acsnano.6b08193 28314099 · DOI
  103. [108]Arjmand M. Ardeshirylajimi A. Maghsoudi H. Azadian E. Osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on nanofibrous scaffold improved in the presence of pulsed electromagnetic field J. Cell. Physiol. 233 2017 1061 1070 10.1002/jcp.25962 28419435 · DOI
  104. [109]Wang J. An Y. Li F. Li D. Jing D. Guo T. Luo E. Ma C. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic field on the functions of osteoblasts on implant surfaces with different topographies Acta Biomater. 10 2014 975 985 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.008 24140610 · DOI
  105. [110]Castro N. Fernandes M.M. Ribeiro C. Correia V. Minguez R. Lanceros-Méndez S. Magnetic bioreactor for magneto-, mechano- and electroactive tissue engineering strategies Sensors 20 2020 3340 10.3390/s20123340 PMC7349750 32545551 · DOI
  106. [111]Correia D.M. Sencadas V. Ribeiro C. Martins P.M. Martins P. Gama F.M. Botelho G. Lanceros-Méndez S. Processing and size range separation of pristine and magnetic poly(L-lactic acid) based microspheres for biomedical applications J. Colloid Interface Sci. 476 2016 79 86 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.012 27209393 · DOI
  107. [112]Martins P.M. Ribeiro S. Ribeiro C. Sencadas V. Gomes A.C. Gama F.M. Lanceros-Méndez S. Effect of poling state and morphology of piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes for skeletal muscle tissue engineering RSC Adv. 3 2013 17938 17944 10.1039/C3RA43499K · DOI
  108. [113]Mushtaq F. Torlakcik H. Vallmajo-Martin Q. Can Siringil E. Zhang J. Röhrig C. Shen Y. Yu Y. Chen X.-Z. Müller R. Nelson B.J. Pané S. Magnetoelectric 3D scaffolds for enhanced bone cell proliferation Appl. Mater. Today 16 2019 290 300 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.06.004 · DOI
  109. [114]Surmenev R.A. Surmeneva M.A. Ivanova A.A. Significance of calcium phosphate coatings for the enhancement of new bone osteogenesis – a review Acta Biomater. 10 2014 557 579 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.036 24211734 · DOI
  110. [115]Tang B. Zhuang J. Wang L. Zhang B. Lin S. Jia F. Dong L. Wang Q. Cheng K. Weng W. Harnessing cell dynamic responses on magnetoelectric nanocomposite films to promote osteogenic differentiation ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 2018 7841 7851 10.1021/acsami.7b19385 29412633 · DOI
  111. [116]Zhang Y. Chen L. Zeng J. Zhou K. Zhang D. Aligned porous barium titanate/hydroxyapatite composites with high piezoelectric coefficients for bone tissue engineering Mater. Sci. Eng. C 39 2014 143 149 10.1016/j.msec.2014.02.022 24863210 · DOI
  112. [117]Shokrollahi H. Salimi F. Doostmohammadi A. The fabrication and characterization of barium titanate/akermanite nano-bio-ceramic with a suitable piezoelectric coefficient for bone defect recovery J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 74 2017 365 370 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.024 28672271 · DOI
  113. [118]Wang Q. Yang J. Zhang W. Khoie R. Li Y. Zhu J. Chen Z. Manufacture and cytotoxicity of a lead-free piezoelectric ceramic as a bone substitute-consolidation of porous lithium sodium potassium niobate by cold isostatic pressing Int. J. Oral Sci. 1 2009 99 104 10.4248/ijos.09005 20687302 PMC3735798 · DOI
  114. [119]Kitsara M. Blanquer A. Murillo G. Humblot V. De Bragança Vieira S. Nogués C. Ibáñez E. Esteve J. Barrios L. Permanently hydrophilic, piezoelectric PVDF nanofibrous scaffolds promoting unaided electromechanical stimulation on osteoblasts Nanoscale 11 2019 8906 8917 10.1039/C8NR10384D 31016299 · DOI
  115. [120]Li Y. Dai X. Bai Y. Liu Y. Wang Y. Liu Q. Yan F. Tang Z. Zhang X. Deng X. Electroactive BaTiO3 nanoparticle-functionalized fibrous scaffolds enhance osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells Int. J. Nanomed. 12 2017 4007 4018 10.2147/IJN.S135605 PMC5457183 28603415 · DOI
  116. [121]Amna T. Hassan M.S. Sheikh F.A. Lee H.K. Seo K.-S. Yoon D. Hwang I.H. Zinc oxide-doped poly(urethane) spider web nanofibrous scaffold via one-step electrospinning: a novel matrix for tissue engineering Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97 2013 1725 1734 10.1007/s00253-012-4353-0 22918299 · DOI
  117. [122]Zhang X. Zhang C. Lin Y. Hu P. Shen Y. Wang K. Meng S. Chai Y. Dai X. Liu X. Liu Y. Mo X. Cao C. Li S. Deng X. Chen L. Nanocomposite membranes enhance bone regeneration through restoring physiological electric microenvironment ACS Nano 10 2016 7279 7286 10.1021/acsnano.6b02247 27389708 · DOI
  118. [123]Bai Y. Dai X. Yin Y. Wang J. Sun X. Liang W. Li Y. Deng X. Zhang X. Biomimetic piezoelectric nanocomposite membranes synergistically enhance osteogenesis of deproteinized bovine bone grafts Int. J. Nanomed. 14 2019 3015 3026 10.2147/IJN.S197824 PMC6503198 31118619 · DOI
  119. [124]Schult M. Buckow E. Seitz H. Experimental studies on 3D printing of barium titanate ceramics for medical applications Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2 2016 95 96 10.1515/cdbme-2016-0024 · DOI
  120. [125]Marino A. Barsotti J. de Vito G. Filippeschi C. Mazzolai B. Piazza V. Labardi M. Mattoli V. Ciofani G. Two-photon lithography of 3D nanocomposite piezoelectric scaffolds for cell stimulation ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 2015 25574 25579 10.1021/acsami.5b08764 26548588 · DOI
  121. [126]Liu W. Zhang F. Yan Y. Zhang C. Zhao H. Chin Heng B. Huang Y. Shen Y. Zhang J. Chen L. Wen X. Deng X. Remote tuning of built-in magnetoelectric microenvironment to promote bone regeneration by modulating cellular exposure to arginylglycylaspartic acid peptide Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2021 2006226 10.1002/adfm.202006226 · DOI
  122. [127]Fang J.-H. Hsu H.-H. Hsu R.-S. Peng C.-K. Lu Y.-J. Chen Y.-Y. Chen S.-Y. Hu S.-H. 4D printing of stretchable nanocookie@conduit material hosting biocues and magnetoelectric stimulation for neurite sprouting NPG Asia Mater. 12 2020 61 10.1038/s41427-020-00244-1 · DOI
  123. [128]Pariy I.O. Ivanova A.A. Shvartsman V.V. Lupascu D.C. Sukhorukov G.B. Surmeneva M.A. Surmenev R.A. Poling and annealing of piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride) micropillar arrays Mater. Chem. Phys. 239 2020 122035 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122035 PMC6632062 31226755 · DOI
  124. [129]Pariy I.O. Ivanova A.A. Shvartsman V.V. Lupascu D.C. Sukhorukov G.B. Ludwig T. Bartasyte A. Mathur S. Surmeneva M.A. Surmenev R.A. Piezoelectric response in hybrid micropillar arrays of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and reduced graphene oxide Polymers 11 2019 1065 10.3390/polym11061065 PMC6632062 31226755 · DOI
  125. [130]Ribeiro C. Costa C.M. Correia Daniela M. Nunes-Pereira J. Oliveira J. Martins P. Gonçalves R. F Cardoso V. Lanceros-Méndez S. Electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based structures for advanced applications Nat. Protoc. 13 2018 681 704 10.1038/nprot.2017.157 29543796 · DOI
  126. [131]Liu Z. Wan X. Wang Z.L. Li L. Electroactive biomaterials and systems for cell fate determination and tissue regeneration: design and applications Adv. Mater 2021 2007429 10.1002/adma.202007429 34117803 · DOI
  127. [132]Carreno F.R. Frazer A. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression Neurotherapeutics 14 2017 716 727 10.1007/s13311-017-0537-8 28585221 PMC5509631 · DOI · Paper page
  128. [133]Fregni F. Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology—perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 3 2007 383 393 10.1038/ncpneuro0530 17611487 · DOI
  129. [134]Kringelbach M.L. Jenkinson N. Owen S.L. Aziz T.Z. Translational principles of deep brain stimulation Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 2007 623 635 10.1038/nrn2196 17637800 · DOI · Paper page
  130. [135]Yue K. Guduru R. Hong J. Liang P. Nair M. Khizroev S. Magneto-electric nano-particles for non-invasive brain stimulation PLoS One 7 2012 e44040 10.1371/journal.pone.0044040 22957042 PMC3434207 · DOI · Paper page
  131. [136]Guduru R. Liang P. Hong J. Rodzinski A. Hadjikhani A. Horstmyer J. Levister E. Khizroev S. Magnetoelectric ‘spin’ on stimulating the brain Nanomedicine (Lond) 10 2015 2051 2061 10.2217/nnm.15.52 25953069 PMC4910966 · DOI · Paper page
  132. [137]Rothwell J. Transcranial brain stimulation: Past and future. Brain. Neurosci. Adv. 2 2018 32166172 10.1177/2398212818818070 PMC7058222 32166172 · DOI
  133. [138]Nguyen T. Gao J. Wang P. Nagesetti A. Andrews P. Masood S. Vriesman Z. Liang P. Khizroev S. Jin X. In vivo wireless brain stimulation via non-invasive and targeted delivery of magnetoelectric nanoparticles Neurotherapeutics 2021 10.1007/s13311-021-01071-0 PMC8609092 34131858 · DOI
  134. [139]Khizroev S. Technobiology's enabler: the magnetoelectric nanoparticle Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 9 2019 a034207 10.1101/cshperspect.a034207 30291147 PMC6671931 · DOI
  135. [140]Ye H. Steiger A. Neuron matters: electric activation of neuronal tissue is dependent on the interaction between the neuron and the electric field J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 12 2015 65 10.1186/s12984-015-0061-1 26265444 PMC4534030 · DOI
  136. [141]Islam R.A. Bedekar V. Poudyal N. Liu J.P. Priya S. Magnetoelectric properties of core-shell particulate nanocomposites J. Appl. Phys. 104 2008 104111 10.1063/1.3013437 · DOI
  137. [142]Shi Y. Li N. Wang Y. Ye J. An analytical model for nonlinear magnetoelectric effect in laminated composites Compos. Struct. 263 2021 113652 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113652 · DOI
  138. [143]Popov C. Chang H. Record P.M. Abraham E. Whatmore R.W. Huang Z. Direct and converse magnetoelectric effect at resonant frequency in laminar piezoelectric-magnetostrictive composite J. Electroceram. 20 2008 53 58 10.1007/s10832-007-9184-5 · DOI
  139. [144]Cho K.H. Priya S. Direct and converse effect in magnetoelectric laminate composites Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 2011 232904 10.1063/1.3584863 · DOI
  140. [145]Liu W. Miroshnichenko A.E. Neshev D.N. Kivshar Y.S. Broadband unidirectional scattering by magneto-electric core-shell nanoparticles ACS Nano 6 2012 5489 5497 10.1021/nn301398a 22545872 · DOI
  141. [146]Popov M. Sreenivasulu G. Petrov V.M. Chavez F.A. Srinivasan G. High frequency magneto-dielectric effects in self-assembled ferrite-ferroelectric core-shell nanoparticles AIP Adv. 4 2014 97117 10.1063/1.4895591 · DOI
  142. [147]Chandra C.R. Bharani P.S.N. Kumar Y.R. Frequently dependent attenuation of EM radiation on biological tissues Int J Adv Res EEIE 3 2014 12094 12099 10.15662/ijareeie.2014.0309031 · DOI
  143. [148]Ziskin M.C. Alekseev S.I. Foster K.R. Balzano Q. Tissue models for RF exposure evaluation at frequencies above 6 GHz Bioelectromagnetics 39 2018 173 189 10.1002/bem.22110 29418010 · DOI
  144. [149]Hadjikhani A. Rodzinski A. Wang P. Nagesetti A. Guduru R. Liang P. Runowicz C. Shahbazmohamadi S. Khizroev S. Biodistribution and clearance of magnetoelectric nanoparticles for nanomedical applications using energy dispersive spectroscopy Nanomedicine (Lond) 12 2017 1801 1822 10.2217/nnm-2017-0080 28705034 PMC5551528 · DOI
  145. [150]Kaushik A. Jayant R. Nikkhah-Moshaie R. Bhardwaj V. Roy U. Huang Z. Ruiz A. Yndart A. Atluri V. El-Hage N. Khalili K. Nair M. Magnetically guided central nervous system delivery and toxicity evaluation of magneto-electric nanocarriers Sci. Rep. 6 2016 25309 10.1038/srep25309 27143580 PMC4855156 · DOI
  146. [151]Veronese F.M. Pasut G. PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery Drug Discov. Today 10 2005 1451 1458 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03575-0 16243265 · DOI
  147. [152]Nair M. Guduru R. Liang P. Hong J. Sagar V. Khizroev S. Externally controlled on-demand release of anti-HIV drug using magneto-electric nanoparticles as carriers Nat. Commun. 4 2013 1707 10.1038/ncomms2717 23591874 · DOI
  148. [154]Prausnitz M.R. Bose V.G. Langer R. Weaver J.C. Electroporation of mammalian skin: a mechanism to enhance transdermal drug delivery Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 90 1993 10504 10508 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10504 PMC47805 8248137 · DOI
  149. [155]Guduru R. Liang P. Runowicz C. Nair M. Atluri V. Khizroev S. Magnetoelectric nanoparticles to enable field-controlled high-specificity drug delivery to eradicate ovarian cancer cells Sci. Rep. 3 2013 10.1038/srep02953 2953–2953 PMC3797424 24129652 · DOI
  150. [156]Rodzinski A. Guduru R. Liang P. Hadjikhani A. Stewart T. Stimphil E. Runowicz C. Cote R. Altman N. Datar R. Khizroev S. Targeted and controlled anticancer drug delivery and release with magnetoelectric nanoparticles Sci. Rep. 6 2016 10.1038/srep20867 20867–20867 PMC4753509 26875783 · DOI
  151. [157]Stimphil E. Nagasetti A. Guduru R. Stewart T. Rodzinski A. Liang P. Khizroev S. Physics considerations in targeted anticancer drug delivery by magnetoelectric nanoparticles Appl. Phys. Rev. 4 2017 21101 10.1063/1.4978642 · DOI
  152. [158]Stewart T.S. Nagesetti A. Guduru R. Liang P. Stimphil E. Hadjikhani A. Salgueiro L. Horstmyer J. Cai R. Schally A. Khizroev S. Magnetoelectric nanoparticles for delivery of antitumor peptides into glioblastoma cells by magnetic fields Nanomedicine (Lond) 13 2018 423 438 10.2217/nnm-2017-0300 29345190 PMC5810849 · DOI
  153. [159]Biran R. Martin D.C. Tresco P.A. The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 82 2007 169 178 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112781 17266019 · DOI
  154. [160]Dinis H. Mendes P.M. A comprehensive review of powering methods used in state-of-the-art miniaturized implantable electronic devices Biosens. Bioelectron. 172 2021 112781 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112781 33160236 · DOI
  155. [161]Truong B.D. Roundy S. Experimentally validated model and power optimization of a magnetoelectric wireless power transfer system in free-free configuration Smart Mater. Struct. 29 2020 85053 10.1088/1361-665X/ab90a2 · DOI
  156. [162]Rupp T. Truong B.D. Williams S. Roundy S. Magnetoelectric transducer designs for use as wireless power receivers in wearable and implantable Applications Materials 12 2019 512 10.3390/ma12030512 PMC6384833 30744044 · DOI
  157. [164]Monti G. Arcuti P. Tarricone L. Resonant inductive link for remote powering of pacemakers IEEE Trans. Microw. Theor. Tech. 63 2015 3814 3822 10.1109/TMTT.2015.2481387 · DOI
  158. [165]Campi T. Cruciani S. Palandrani F. De Santis V. Hirata A. Feliziani M. Wireless power transfer charging system for aimds and pacemakers IEEE Trans. Microw. Theor. Tech. 64 2016 633 642 10.1109/TMTT.2015.2511011 · DOI
  159. [166]Talleb H. Ren Z. Finite element modeling of a magnetoelectric energy transducer including the load effect IEEE Trans. Magn. 51 2015 1 5 10.1109/TMAG.2014.2357492 7401305 · DOI
  160. [169]Piech D.K. Johnson B.C. Shen K. Ghanbari M.M. Li K.Y. Neely R.M. Kay J.E. Carmena J.M. Maharbiz M.M. Muller R. A wireless millimetre-scale implantable neural stimulator with ultrasonically powered bidirectional communication Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4 2020 207 222 10.1038/s41551-020-0518-9 32076132 · DOI · Paper page
  161. [170]Seo D. Neely R.M. Shen K. Singhal U. Alon E. Rabaey J.M. Carmena J.M. Maharbiz M.M. Wireless recording in the peripheral nervous system with ultrasonic neural dust Neuron 91 2016 529 539 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.034 27497221 · DOI · Paper page
  162. [171]Basaeri H. Christensen D. Roundy S. A review of acoustic power transfer for bio-medical implants Smart Mater. Struct. 25 2016 123001 10.1088/0964-1726/25/12/123001 · DOI · Paper page
  163. [173]Burton A. Obaid S.N. Vázquez-Guardado A. Schmit M.B. Stuart T. Le Cai Chen Z. Kandela I. Haney C.R. Waters E.A. Cai H. Rogers J.A. Lu L. Gutruf P. Wireless, battery-free subdermally implantable photometry systems for chronic recording of neural dynamics Proc.Nat. Acad. Sci. 117 2020 2835 2845 10.1073/pnas.1920073117 31974306 PMC7022161 · DOI
  164. [174]Hinchet R. Yoon H.-J. Ryu H. Kim M.-K. Choi E.-K. Kim D.-S. Kim S.-W. Transcutaneous ultrasound energy harvesting using capacitive triboelectric technology Science 365 2019 491 494 10.1126/science.aan3997 31371614 · DOI · Paper page
  165. [175]Song S.H. Kim A. Ziaie B. Omnidirectional ultrasonic powering for millimeterscale implantable devices IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62 2015 2717 2723 10.1109/TBME.2015.2444854 26080376 · DOI
  166. [176]Nan T. Lin H. Gao Y. Matyushov A. Yu G. Chen H. Sun N. Wei S. Wang Z. Li M. Wang X. Belkessam A. Guo R. Chen B. Zhou J. Qian Z. Hui Y. Rinaldi M. McConney M.E. Howe B.M. Hu Z. Jones J.G. Brown G.J. Sun N.X. Acoustically actuated ultra-compact nems magnetoelectric antennas Nat. Commun. 8 2017 296 10.1038/s41467-017-00343-8 28831042 PMC5567369 · DOI
  167. [177]Kramer B.A. Chen C.-C. Lee M. Volakis J.L. Fundamental limits and design guidelines for miniaturizing ultra-wideband antennas IEEE Antenn. Propag. Mag. 51 2009 57 69 10.1109/MAP.2009.5338684 · DOI
  168. [178]Int. Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection 1998 Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 ghz) Health Phys. 75 1998 494 522 9525427
  169. [179]McRobbie D. Concerning guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (1 hz-100 khz) Health Phys. 100 2011 442 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86 21350350 · DOI
  170. [180]IEEE IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, IEEE Std C95.1-2005 (Revision of IEEE Std C95.1-1991) 2006 1 238
  171. [181]IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, 0–3 kHz, IEEE Std C95.6-2002 2002 1-0
  172. [182]IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz,” IEEE, Tech. Rep., iSBN: 9781504455480.
  173. [184]Young J. Wang M.-T. Brezovich I. Frequency/depth-penetration considerations in hyperthermia by magnetically induced currents Electron. Lett. 16 1980 358 359 10.1049/el_19800255 · DOI
  174. [185]Zaeimbashi M. Lin H. Dong C. Liang X. Nasrollahpour M. Chen H. Sun N. Matyushov A. He Y. Wang X. Tu C. Wei Y. Zhang Y. Cash S.S. Onabajo M. Shrivastava A. Sun N. NanoNeuroRFID: a wireless implantable device based on magnetoelectric antennas IEEE J. Electromagn. RF Microw. Med. Biol. 3 2019 206 215 10.1109/JERM.2019.2903930 · DOI
  175. [186]Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment 2010 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge, U.K.
  176. [187]Zaeimbashi M. Methods and Techniques for Magnetic Neural Stimulation and Recording PhD thesis 2020 ProQuest Number: 28090985
  177. [188]McGlynn E. Das R. Heidari H. Encapsulated magnetoelectric composites for wirelessly powered brain implantable devices 2020 27th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) 2020 1 4 10.1109/ICECS49266.2020.9294847 · DOI
  178. [189]O'Handley R.C. Huang J.K. Currier Bono D. Simon J. Improved wireless, transcutaneous power transmission for in vivo applications IEEE Sensor. J. 8 2008 57 62 10.1109/JSEN.2007.912899 · DOI
  179. [190]Timot J. Shepard K.L. Bioelectronic devices: wirelessly powered implants Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1 2017 51 10.1038/s41551-017-0051 · DOI
  180. [192]Newacheck S. Youssef G. Wireless energy transfer based on strain-mediated composite multiferroics Smart Mater. Struct. 29 2020 15014 10.1088/1361-665X/ab545b · DOI
  181. [194]Yang C.-L. Chang C.-K. Lee S.-Y. Chang S.-J. Chiou L.-Y. Efficient four-coil wireless power transfer for deep brain stimulation IEEE Trans. Microw. Theor. Tech. 65 2017 2496 2507 10.1109/TMTT.2017.2658560 · DOI
  182. [195]Wu F. Tien L.W. Chen F. Berke J.D. L Kaplan D. Yoon E. Silkbacked structural optimization of high-density flexible intracortical neural probes J-MEMS 24 2015 62 69 10.1109/JMEMS.2014.2375326 · DOI · Paper page
  183. [196]Qazi R. Novel Class of Chronic and Implantable Wireless Optofluidic (wOF) Neural Devices for in Vivo Drug Delivery and Optogenetics in Freely Moving Animals PhD thesis 2019
  184. [197]Jeong J. Jung J. Jung D. Kim J. Ju H. Kim T. Lee J. An implantable optogenetic stimulator wirelessly powered by flexible photovoltaics with near-infrared (NIR) light Biosens. Bioelectron. 180 2021 113 139 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113139 33714161 · DOI
  185. [198]Boyden E.S. Zhang F. Bamberg E. Nagel G. Deisseroth K. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity Nat. Neurosci. 8 2005 1263 1268 10.1038/nn1525 16116447 · DOI
  186. [199]Wang Y. Guo L. Nanomaterial-enabled neural stimulation Front. Neurosci. 10 2016 69 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004 27013938 PMC4779906 · DOI · Paper page
  187. [200]Shin G. Gomez A.M. Al-Hasani R. Ra Jeong Y. Kim J. Xie Z. Banks A. Min Lee S. Youn Han S. Jong Yoo C. Lee J.-L. Hee Lee S. Kurniawan J. Tureb J. Guo Z. Yoon J. Il Park S. Yun Bang S. Rogers J.A. Flexible near-field wireless optoelectronics as subdermal implants for broad applications in optogenetics Neuron 93 2017 509 521 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.031 e3 28132830 PMC5377903 · DOI · Paper page
  188. [201]Zhang Y. Zhang X. Wang H. Tian Y. Pan H. Zhang L. Wang F. Chang J. Remote regulation of optogenetic proteins by a magneto-luminescence microdevice Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2021 2006357 10.1002/adfm.202006357 · DOI
  189. [203]Wells J.D. Kao C. Jansen E.D. Konrad P.E. Mahadevan-Jansen A. Application of infrared light for in vivo neural stimulation J. Biomed. Opt. 10 2005 64003 10.1117/1.2121772 16409069 · DOI
  190. [204]Yizhar O. Fenno L.E. Davidson T.J. Mogri M. Deisseroth K. Optogenetics in neural systems Neuron 71 2011 9 34 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004 21745635 · DOI · Paper page
  191. [205]Knopfel T. Genetically encoded optical indicators for the analysis of neuronal circuits Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13 2012 687 700 10.1038/nrn3293 22931891 · DOI · Paper page
  192. [206]Horton N.G. Wang K. Kobat D. Clark C.G. Wise F.W. Schaffer C.B. Xu C. In vivo three-photon microscopy of subcortical structures within an intact mouse brain Nat. Photonics 7 2013 205 209 10.1038/nphoton.2012.336 PMC3864872 24353743 · DOI · Paper page
  193. [207]Legon W. F Sato T. Opitz A. Mueller J. Barbour A. Williams A. Tyler W.J. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans Nat. Neurosci. 17 2014 322 329 10.1038/nn.3620 24413698 · DOI
  194. [208]Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer Neuron 55 2007 187 199 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026 17640522 · DOI
  195. [209]Gourine A.V. Kasymov V. Marina N. Tang F.G. Figueiredo M.F. Lane S. Teschemacher A.G. Spyer K.M. Deisseroth K. Kasparov S. Astrocytes control breathing through pH-dependent release of ATP Science 329 2010 571 575 10.1126/science.1190721 20647426 PMC3160742 · DOI
  196. [210]Tonnesen J. Sorensen A.T. Deisseroth K. Lundberg C. Kokaia M. Optogenetic control of epileptiform activity Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 2009 12162 12167 10.1073/pnas.0901915106 19581573 PMC2715517 · DOI
  197. [211]Lee H.E. Park J.H. Jang D. Shin J.H. Im T.H. Lee J.H. Hong S.K. Wang H.S. Kwak M.S. Peddigari M. Jeong C.K. Min Y. Park C.H. Choi J.-J. Ryu J. Yoon W.-H. Kim D. Lee K.J. Hwang G.-T. Optogenetic brain neuromodulation by stray magnetic field via flash-enhanced magneto-mechano-triboelectric nanogenerator Nano Energy 75 2020 104951 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104951 · DOI
  198. [212]Lee H.E. Shin J.H. Park J.H. Hong S.K. Park S.H. Lee S.H. Lee J.H. Kang I.S. Lee K.J. Micro light-emitting diodes for display and flexible biomedical applications Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 2019 1808075 10.1002/adfm.201808075 · DOI
  199. [213]Lee S.H. Kim J. Shin J.H. Lee H.E. Kang I.S. Gwak K. Kim D.S. Kim D. Lee K.J. Optogenetic control of body movements via flexible vertical light-emitting diodes on brain surface Nano Energy 44 2018 447 455 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.011 · DOI
  200. [214]Adamantidis A.R. Zhang F. Aravanis A.M. Deisseroth K. De Lecea L. Neural substrates of awakening probed with optogenetic control of hypocretin neurons Nature 450 2007 420 424 10.1038/nature06310 17943086 PMC6744371 · DOI · Paper page

200 of 213 shown

Authors
Kopyl, S., Surmenev, R., Surmeneva, M., Fetisov, Y., & Kholkin, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • Tomsk Polytechnic University (RU)
  • MIREA - Russian Technological University (RU)
  • Ural Federal University (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Kopyl, S.
  • Kholkin, A.
ORCID
Venue
Materials Today Bio
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
12
Pages
100149
ISSN
2590-0064 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100149
PMC
PMC8554634
OpenAlex
W3207863303
Cited by
202
References
231
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 26
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Materials Today Bio (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Electronic Archive of Ural Federal University (ELAR UrFU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
  • Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (075-15-2021-588, 1.06.2021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Multiferroics and related materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Dielectric materials and actuators
Keywords
magnetoelectric effect, magnetoelectric composites, magnetostrictive-piezoelectric coupling, biomedical applications, non-invasive neural stimulation, intracellular drug delivery, wireless power transfer, optogenetics, magnetostrictive materials, piezoelectric materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review