Cited by 7Reproductive tract infections researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Quantitative system for diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis

Open access
Dermendzhiev, T, Pehlivanov, B, Petrova, A, Stanev, S., Murdjeva, M.·2022·Journal of Medical Mycology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal infections are one of the most common reason for gynecological consultations. Many of them are the result of overgrowth of resident microorganisms. The clinical symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis are nonspecific and an accurate diagnosis is a problem that often leads to inadequate treatment or delays in treatment. The lack of an exact and practical diagnostic method is a common cause of misdiagnosis. AIM: To create a complex, quantitative method for the diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis which to enables differentiation from vaginal fungal colonization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 2306 vaginal samples were examined. Clinical, microbiological, epidemiological methods and statistical models are used. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The proposed score system is a specific, sensitive and inexpensive method to routinely diagnose vulvovaginal candidiasis. Statistical processing of the obtained data shows the impact of the individual components on which the method is based: the presence of vaginal discharge, pruritus, direct microscopy and assessment of the fungal growth. The data analysis reveals good sensitivity (71%) and high specificity (98%) of the method. This allows accurate interpretation of the result of the clinical and microbiological examination of each patient. CONCLUSION: The system for diagnosing vulvovaginal candidiasis is complex and based on quantitative indicators. The method can be used to differentiate vulvovaginal candidiasis from vaginal fungal colonization (the cut-off value is 5.5 points) and to more accurately interpret a Candida positive result from quantitative real-time PCR in asymptomatic patients or in women with mixed vaginal infection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mycmed.2022.101302

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VVC diagnosis often relies on clinical symptoms, leading to 50% diagnostic imprecision, which can result in inappropriate antifungal prescriptions and increased resistance.

    “Consequently, diagnosis often relies on clinical symptoms, which can be imprecise and have low specificity, leading to a 50% rate of diagnostic imprecision [62]. This empirical approach can result in inappropriate antifungal prescriptions, contributing to increased resistance and recurrent [63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dermendzhiev, T., Pehlivanov, B., Petrova, A., Stanev, S., & Murdjeva, M.
Affiliations
Medical University Plovdiv (BG)
Corresponding author
Petrova, A
Venue
Journal of Medical Mycology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
101302
ISSN
1156-5233 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283211860
Cited by
7
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal de Mycologie Médicale (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
vaginal candidiasis, Candida, quantitative real-time PCR, vaginal discharge, pruritus, direct microscopy, mixed vaginal infections, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Candida, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Female, Humans, Vagina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review