The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solid-state and biological nanopore for real-time sensing of single chemical and sequencing of DNA
Open accessAbstract
Sensitivity and specificity are two most important factors to take into account for molecule sensing, chemical detection and disease diagnosis. A perfect sensitivity is to reach the level where a single molecule can be detected. An ideal specificity is to reach the level where the substance can be detected in the presence of many contaminants. The rapidly progressing nanopore technology is approaching this threshold. A wide assortment of biomotors and cellular pores in living organisms perform diverse biological functions. The elegant design of these transportation machineries has inspired the development of single molecule detection based on modulations of the individual current blockage events. The dynamic growth of nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology has stimulated rapid advances in the study of nanopore based instrumentation over the last decade, and inspired great interest in sensing of single molecules including ions, nucleotides, enantiomers, drugs, and polymers such as PEG, RNA, DNA, and polypeptides. This sensing technology has been extended to medical diagnostics and third generation high throughput DNA sequencing. This review covers current nanopore detection platforms including both biological pores and solid state counterparts. Several biological nanopores have been studied over the years, but this review will focus on the three best characterized systems including α-hemolysin and MspA, both containing a smaller channel for the detection of single-strand DNA, as well as bacteriophage phi29 DNA packaging motor connector that contains a larger channel for the passing of double stranded DNA. The advantage and disadvantage of each system are compared; their current and potential applications in nanomedicine, biotechnology, and nanotechnology are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA
Heather, J. M., & Chain, B. (2016) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.11.003 · Cited by 1,397
“Despite the admittedly poor quality pro fi les currently observed, it is hoped that such sequencers represent a genuinely disruptive technology in the DNA sequencing fi eld, producing incredibly long read (non-ampli fi ed) sequence data far cheaper and faster than was previously possible [92,90,85].”
Tetraphenylethylene-Based AIE-Active Probes for Sensing Applications
La, D. D., Bhosale, S. V., Jones, L. A., & Bhosale, S. V. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b12320 · Cited by 585
Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics
Børsting, C., & Morling, N. (2015) · Forensic Science International: Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.002 · Cited by 460
Nanopore-Based Fourth-Generation DNA Sequencing Technology
Feng, Y., Zhang, Y., Ying, C., Wang, D., & Du, C. (2015) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2015.01.009 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Haque, F., Li, J., Wu, H.-C., Liang, X.-J., & Guo, P.
- Venue
- Nano Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-74
- ISSN
- 1748-0132 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143789454
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solid-state and biological nanopore for real-time sensing of single chemical and sequencing of DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nantod.2012.12.008
- The paper
- Haque, F., Li, J., Wu, H.-C., Liang, X.-J., & Guo, P. (2013). Solid-state and biological nanopore for real-time sensing of single chemical and sequencing of DNA. Nano Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2012.12.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.