The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticles for cancer imaging: The good, the bad, and the promise
Open accessAbstract
Summary Recent advances in molecular imaging and nanotechnology are providing new opportunities for biomedical imaging with great promise for the development of novel imaging agents. The unique optical, magnetic, and chemical properties of materials at the scale of nanometers allow the creation of imaging probes with better contrast enhancement, increased sensitivity, controlled biodistribution, better spatial and temporal information, multi-functionality and multi-modal imaging across MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound. These features could ultimately translate to clinical advantages such as earlier detection, real time assessment of disease progression and personalized medicine. However, several years of investigation into the application of these materials to cancer research has revealed challenges that have delayed the successful application of these agents to the field of biomedical imaging. Understanding these challenges is critical to take full advantage of the benefits offered by nano-sized imaging agents. Therefore, this article presents the lessons learned and challenges encountered by a group of leading researchers in this field, and suggests ways forward to develop nanoparticle probes for cancer imaging. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Longmire, M., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H. (2008) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.3.5.703 · Cited by 2,149
Cited by
Carbon dots—Emerging light emitters for bioimaging, cancer therapy and optoelectronics
Hola, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Giannelis, E. P., Zboril, R., & Rogach, A. L. (2014) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.004 · Cited by 992
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers: Antibody Mimics for Bioimaging and Therapy
Haupt, K., Medina Rangel, P. X., & Bui, B. T. S. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00428 · Cited by 561
Nanoparticles in Daily Life: Applications, Toxicity and Regulations
Gupta, R., & Xie, H. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology · doi:10.1615/jenvironpatholtoxicoloncol.2018026009 · Cited by 553
Shahbazi, M.-A., Faghfouri, L., Ferreira, M. P. A., Figueiredo, P., Maleki, H., Sefat, F., Hirvonen, J., & Santos, H. A. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00283a · Cited by 523
Vieira, D., & Gamarra, L. (2016) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s117210 · Cited by 427
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, S., Dobrovolskaia, M., Farahani, K., Goodwin, A., Joshi, A., Lee, H., Meade, T., Pomper, M., Ptak, K., Rao, J., Singh, R., Sridhar, S., Stern, S., Wang, A., Weaver, J. B., Woloschak, G., & Yang, L.
- Venue
- Nano Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 454-460
- ISSN
- 1748-0132 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017669739
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticles for cancer imaging: The good, the bad, and the promise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nantod.2013.06.001
- The paper
- Chapman, S., Dobrovolskaia, M., Farahani, K., Goodwin, A., Joshi, A., Lee, H., Meade, T., Pomper, M., Ptak, K., Rao, J., Singh, R., Sridhar, S., Stern, S., Wang, A., Weaver, J. B., Woloschak, G., & Yang, L. (2013). Nanoparticles for cancer imaging: The good, the bad, and the promise. Nano Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2013.06.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
