Cited by 27Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Asparagine endopeptidase cleaves tau at N167 after uptake into microglia

Open access
Behrendt, Annika, Bichmann, Maria, Ercan-Herbst, Ebru, Haberkant, Per, Schöndorf, David C., Wolf, Michael, Fahim, Salma A., Murolo, Enrico +1 more·2019·Neurobiology of Disease

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Tau cleavage by different proteolytic enzymes generates short, aggregation-prone fragments that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Asparagine endopeptidase (AEP) activity in particular has been associated with tau dysfunction and aggregation, and the activity of the protease is increased in both aging and AD. Using a mass spectrometry approach, we identified a novel tau cleavage site at N167 and confirmed its processing by AEP. In combination with the previously known site at N368, we show that AEP cleavage yields a tau fragment that is present in both control and AD brains at similar levels. AEP is a lysosomal enzyme, and our data suggest that it is expressed in microglia rather than in neurons. Accordingly, we observe tau cleavage at N167 and N368 after endocytotic uptake into microglia, but not neurons. However, tau 168-368 does not accumulate in microglia and we thus conclude that the fragment is part of a proteolytic cascade leading to tau degradation. While we confirm previous studies showing increased overall AEP activity in AD brains, our data suggests that AEP-mediated cleavage of tau is a physiological event occurring during microglial degradation of the secreted neuronal protein. As a consequence, we caution against preventing AEP-mediated tau cleavage as a therapeutic approach in AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104518

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behrendt, A., Bichmann, M., Ercan-Herbst, E., Haberkant, P., Schöndorf, D. C., Wolf, M., Fahim, S. A., Murolo, E., & Ehrnhoefer, D. E.
Affiliations
  • BioMed X (DE)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Ehrnhoefer, Dagmar E.
Venue
Neurobiology of Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
130
Pages
104518
ISSN
0969-9961 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953257368
Cited by
26
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Disease (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
AbbVie Deutschland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
asparaginyl endopeptidase, tau cleavage, Alzheimer's disease, microglia, lysosomal proteolysis, endocytosis, tau aggregation, tau degradation, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Asparaginyl Endopeptidase, Brain, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Humans, Neurons, Mass Spectrometry, tau Proteins, Microglia, HEK293 Cells, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review