CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 144Nursing education and managementHigher Education Research StudiesEvasion and Academic Success Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Jeffreys's Nursing Universal Retention and Success model: Overview and action ideas for optimizing outcomes A–Z

Jeffreys, Marianne R.·2015·Nurse Education Today
DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Nursing student persistence, retention, and success are universally desired outcomes yet remain elusive and challenging worldwide.Objectives The aim of this study is to provide nurse educators with an organizing framework and action ideas for optimizing student outcomes.Conceptual model Jeffreys's Nursing Universal Retention and Success (NURS) model presents a globally-applicable framework for examining the multidimensional factors that affect undergraduate and graduate nursing student retention and success in order to make a positive difference.Discussion This article presents a brief overview of the empirically-based NURS model and indicates that retention decisions, persistence, and optimal outcomes will be based on the interaction of student profile characteristics, student affective factors, academic factors, environmental factors, academic outcomes, psychological outcomes, outside surrounding factors, and professional integration factors.Conclusion An A-Z list of action ideas provides nurse educators with a springboard for further developing ideas tailored to individual program and student needs. Recommendations for global collaborative partnerships and networks are presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.004

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Jeffreys, M. R.
Affiliations
College of Staten Island (US)
Corresponding author
Jeffreys, Marianne R.
ORCID
Jeffreys, Marianne R.
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
425-431
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.004
OpenAlex
W2088948542
Cited by
144
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
Keywords
nursing student retention, conceptual framework, nursing faculty, academic factors, environmental factors, professional integration
MeSH terms
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Educational Status, Faculty, Nursing, Humans, Learning, Social Support, Students, Nursing, Models, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review