Cited by 65Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic CareCultural Competency in Health Care

Nurse education and willingness to provide spiritual care

Wu, Li-Fen, Tseng, Hui-Chen, Liao, Yu-Chen·2016·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Background Spiritual care is a critical part of holistic care, and nurses require adequate preparation to address the spiritual needs of patients. However, nurses' willingness to provide such care has rarely been reported. Hence, nurses' education, and knowledge of spiritual care, as well as their willingness to provide it require further study.Methods A convenience sample of 200 nurses participated in the study. Quantitative data were collected using a 21-item Spiritual Care Needs Inventory (content validity index=.87; Cronbach's alpha=.96).Results The majority of participants were female (96.5%, n=193) between 21 and 59years old (mean=35.1years). Moreover, the majority of participants had a Bachelor's degree (74.0%, n=148) and 1-36years of clinical experience (mean=12.13years). Regarding religious beliefs, 63 (31.5%) had no religious belief, and 93 (46.5%) did not engage in any religious activity. Overall, the nurses were willing to provide spiritual care, although only 25 (12.5%) felt that they had received adequate education.Conclusion The findings of this study indicate the need for further educational preparation in spiritual care for nurses. Specifically, additional teaching materials are required that are more directly related to spiritual care. Greater emphasis should be placed on different subject areas in school-based education, continuing education, and self-learning education according to the needs of nurses. Since spiritual care education needs policy support, in-depth discussions should take place regarding the approach and cultural environment for providing spiritual care in future nursing courses. Moreover, further studies should investigate barriers in providing spiritual nursing care to patients and whether they are the results of a lack of relevant knowledge or other factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.001

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, L.-F., Tseng, H.-C., & Liao, Y.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
38
Pages
36-41
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2234043193
Cited by
65
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council (NSC 101-2314-B-025-002)
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital/National Taichung University of Science and Technology (TCVGH-NTUST1048501)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
spiritual care, spiritual care education, holistic care, nursing education, continuing education, barriers to spiritual care
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Religion and Medicine, Holistic Nursing, Nurse's Role, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review