Cited by 1,108Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic CareWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Improving the spiritual dimension of whole person care: reaching national and international consensus

Open access
Puchalski, Christina M., Vitillo, Robert, Hull, Sharon K., Reller, Nancy·2014·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Two conferences, Creating More Compassionate Systems of Care (November 2012) and On Improving the Spiritual Dimension of Whole Person Care: The Transformational Role of Compassion, Love and Forgiveness in Health Care (January 2013), were convened with the goals of reaching consensus on approaches to the integration of spirituality into health care structures at all levels and development of strategies to create more compassionate systems of care. The conferences built on the work of a 2009 consensus conference, Improving the Quality of Spiritual Care as a Dimension of Palliative Care. Conference organizers in 2012 and 2013 aimed to identify consensus-derived care standards and recommendations for implementing them by building and expanding on the 2009 conference model of interprofessional spiritual care and its recommendations for palliative care. The 2013 conference built on the 2012 conference to produce a set of standards and recommended strategies for integrating spiritual care across the entire health care continuum, not just palliative care. Deliberations were based on evidence that spiritual care is a fundamental component of high-quality compassionate health care and it is most effective when it is recognized and reflected in the attitudes and actions of both patients and health care providers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2014.9427

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other concepts, such as those from Koenig et al. (2001) and Puchalski et al. (2014), also highlight 'meaning' as an important aspect of spirituality.

    “Other concepts, such as those from Koenig et al. (2001) and Puchalski et al. (2014), also highlight “meaning” as an important aspect of spirituality.”

    From Defining spirituality in healthcare: a systematic review and conceptual framework. (2021) · cites this paper as Puchalski et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [16]Burgener SC: Predicting quality of life in caregivers of Alzheimer's patients: The role of support from and involvement with the religious community. J Pastoral Care Counsel 1999; 53:433–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [17]Cohen SR, Mount BM, Strobel MG, Bui F: The McGill quality of life questionnaire: A measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease: A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliat Med 1995;9:207–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [18]Cohen SR, Mount BM, Tomas JJ, Mount LF: Existential wellbeing is an important determinant of quality of life: Evidence from the McGill quality of life questionnaire. Cancer 1996;77:576–586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [29]National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, 2nd ed. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, 2009. Available at http://www.nationalcancersusproject.org [Google Scholar]
  5. [33]Puchalski C, Lunsford B: The Relationship of Spirituality and Compassion in Health Care. Fetzer Institute, Kalamazoo, MI, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  6. [41]WHO: Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, June19–22, 1946; entered into force April 7, 1948 [Google Scholar]
  7. [42]Fetzer Institute: Health Professions Advisory Council Call Statement: Becoming Aware. Assisi, Italy: Fetzer Institute, 2012, p. 16 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puchalski, C. M., Vitillo, R., Hull, S. K., & Reller, N.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • United Nations (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Sojourn Communications, McLean, Virginia.
Corresponding author
Puchalski, Christina M.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2014-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
642-656
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2047362844
Cited by
1,108
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 155 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 5
FWCI
44.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arthur Vining Davis Foundations
  • Fetzer Institute
  • Archstone Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spiritual care, holistic care, palliative care, forgiveness, love, healthcare quality standards, consensus recommendations, patient-provider relationship
MeSH terms
Consensus Statements as Topic, Empathy, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Models, Psychological, Palliative Care, Quality of Health Care, Terminal Care, United States, Spirituality, Standard of Care, Culturally Competent Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review