Cited by 177Student Stress and CopingHealth and Well-being StudiesHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Relationship between mental health of nursing students and coping, self-esteem and social support.

Open access
Karaca, A., Yildirim, N., Cangur, S., Acikgoz, F., Akkus, D.·2019·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the mental health of Turkish nursing students and the stress experienced during their education, their ways of coping, self-esteem, social support and individual factors.Background Studies on nursing students have shown that students who were not in possession of effective coping strategies were at risk of presenting psychiatric symptoms when under stressful conditions.Methods This was a cross-sectional, case-control study. The sample consisted of 516 nursing students who were studying in an undergraduate program in Turkey. Participants provided data on sociodemographic characteristics by completing the Nursing Education Stress Scale, Coping Behavior Inventory for Nursing Students, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the General Health Questionnaire.Results The main factors which were considered to affect the mental health of nursing students, including "total stress" and "self-esteem" scores, "general health" evaluation, "satisfaction with school life" and "presence of a negative event within the last year", were included in all models of the General Health Questionnaire analysis. Analysis of the data indicated that these factors had strong relationship with mental health of the nursing students.Discussion It is recommended that the mental health of students be monitored throughout the nursing education period and that preventive practices should be established in order to forestall mental health problems amongst nursing students.Conclusion The stress levels of nursing students should be monitored in order to facilitate their ability to cope with stressful situations during their training, and components for coping with stress should be included in the curricula of nursing departments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.029

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karaca, A., Yildirim, N., Cangur, S., Acikgoz, F., & Akkus, D.
Affiliations
Düzce Üniversitesi (TR)
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
76
Pages
44-50
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913482709
Cited by
177
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
26.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace - Düzce (Duzce University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
nursing students, mental health, stress, coping strategies, self-esteem, social support, nursing education, nursing curriculum
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Nursing, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Students, Nursing, Turkey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review