The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing student nurses' readiness to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in their studies and their perceived barriers to accessing AI technology: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background With the projected significant increase in the use of AI in nursing education, it becomes vital for nurse faculty to adequately equip student nurses with the necessary competences to effectively utilize AI in their studies. Ensuring that student nurses are prepared and ready to embrace AI technology is imperative for their successful integration into the healthcare workforce.Objective This study aimed to examine student nurses' readiness to embrace AI technology, explore associated factors, and identify perceived barriers to accessing AI technology.Design Cross sectional study.Settings One public-owned nursing school in the Philippines.Participants Three hundred twenty-three student nurses.Methods Data were collected using structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed to analyze the data.Results The results revealed that student nurses demonstrated moderate readiness to embrace AI in their studies (M = 2.906, SD = 0.692) and perceived moderate barriers to accessing AI technology (M = 2.336, SD = 0.719). Factors associated with students' readiness to embrace AI included self-rated technological proficiency (β = 0.170, p = 0.014), understanding of AI-powered technologies (β = 0.260, p < 0.001), and perceived AI use in nursing practice (β = 0.153, p = 0.022). The study also identified potential barriers to accessing AI technology, such as lack of computer skills to navigate AI, lack of AI knowledge and awareness, and time constraints.Conclusion The findings of this study provided valuable insights into the factors influencing student nurses' attitudes towards AI and shed light on their perceived barriers to accessing AI technology. By enhancing technological proficiency, increasing AI understanding, and providing practical experiences, nurse faculty can better prepare future nurses to effectively navigate the AI-driven healthcare environment and contribute to improved patient care outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Their proactive stance towards learning and adapting their skillset reflects a heightened awareness of the evolving demands of nursing practice in the era of AI [69].”
From Artificial intelligence in future nursing care: exploring perspectives of nursing professionals - a descriptive qualitative study (2024) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections
Ajzen, I. (2011) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 · Cited by 4,846
What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review
Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925 · Cited by 1,340
The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review
Secinaro, S. F., Calandra, D., Secinaro, A., Muthurangu, V., & Biancone, P. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01488-9 · Cited by 1,286
The Theory of Planned Behavior: Selected Recent Advances and Applications
Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107 · Cited by 1,056
Artificial intelligence in education : challenges and opportunities for sustainable development
Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019) · MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN · Cited by 902
Medical students' attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey
Pinto dos Santos, D., Giese, D., Brodehl, S., Chon, S. H., Staab, W., Kleinert, R., Maintz, D., & Baeßler, B. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1 · Cited by 754
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Review and Prediction Case Studies
Rong, G., Mendez, A., Assi, E. B., Zhao, B., & Sawan, M. (2020) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2019.08.015 · Cited by 590
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Bibliometric Analysis
Guo, Y., Hao, Z., Zhao, S., Gong, J., & Yang, F. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18228 · Cited by 512
The Handbook of Behavior Change
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318 · Cited by 446
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Buchanan, 2021, Predicted influences of artificial intelligence on the domains of nursing: Scoping review, JMIR Nurs., 4
- Damerji, 2021, Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting, Acc. Educ., 30, 107, 10.1080/09639284.2021.1872035 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rony, M. K. K., Kayesh, I., Bala, S. D., Akter, F., & Parvin, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25718 · Cited by 190
Grájeda, A., Burgos, J., Olivera, P. C., & Sanjinés, A. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2287917 · Cited by 266
El-Sayed, B. K. M., El‐Sayed, A. A. I., Alsenany, S. A., & Asal, M. G. R. (2024) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104208 · Cited by 136
Falebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2024) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-024-00132-1 · Cited by 154
Schubert, T., Oosterlinck, T., Stevens, R. D., Maxwell, P. H., & van der Schaar, M. (2025) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102968 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Labrague, L. J., Aguilar-Rosales, R., Yboa, B. C., & Sabio, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Samar State University (PH)
- Corresponding author
- Labrague, Leodoro J.
- ORCID
- Labrague, Leodoro J.
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 105945
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386002719
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, nursing students, technology readiness, perceived barriers, nursing education, technological competence, computer skills, time constraints
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Faculty, Humans, Nurses, Students, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review