CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 179Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsInnovations in Medical EducationHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical judgment: The last frontier for evaluation

Lasater, Kathie·2011·Nurse Education in Practice
DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Nursing educators and preceptors often find it difficult to evaluate prelicensure students' clinical judgment development. Clinical judgment is critical to excellent patient care decisions and outcomes. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric, a validated, evidence-based clinical judgment rubric, is described as a tool that offers a common language for students, nurse educators, and preceptors and a trajectory for students' clinical judgment development. The rubric has been used to provide feedback for reflective journals and a means for self-evaluation in addition to a guide for formulating higher level thought questions to shape students' thinking like a nurse.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Murphy, 2004, Using focused reflection and articulation to promote clinical reasoning, Nursing Education Perspectives, 25, 226

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lasater, K.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Lasater, Kathie
ORCID
Lasater, Kathie
Venue
Nurse Education in Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
86-92
ISSN
1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013
OpenAlex
W1994296350
Cited by
179
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
clinical judgment, Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric, prelicensure nursing students, nursing education, clinical preceptors, reflective journals, student self-assessment, feedback, clinical reasoning
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Judgment, Preceptorship, Self-Assessment, Students, Nursing, Nursing Education Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review