Cited by 78Healthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and managementHealth Education and Validation

The role of self-efficacy in mediating between professional identity and self-reported competence among nursing students in the internship period: a quantitative study

Yao, Xiuyu, Yu, Lingling, Shen, Yiru, Kang, Zihua, Wang, Xiaoran·2021·Nurse Education in Practice

Abstract

Aim This study explored the relationship between self-efficacy, professional identity and competence among nursing students and analyzed the mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between professional identity and competence.Background Increasing attention has been paid to the cultivation of competence among nursing students; however, few studies to date have analyzed its related factors and examined their relationship.Design A quantitative study with a descriptive design was performed in this study, adopting an online survey with convenience and snowball sampling. A cross-sectional sample of 887 nursing students in the internship period of their education program in mainland China was recruited from November to December 2020.Methods The Nursing Students Competence Instrument, Professional Identity Questionnaire for Nurse Students and General Self-efficacy Scale were distributed online. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, structural equation modeling (SEM) and the bootstrap method were employed in data analysis.Results Competence was significantly and positively correlated with professional identity (r = 0.598; P < 0.01) and self-efficacy (r = 0.692; P < 0.01). SEM analysis revealed that professional identity (β = 0.31; P < 0.01) or self-efficacy (β = 0.31; P < 0.01) could have a positive impact on competence. Meanwhile, self-efficacy played a mediating role in the relationship between professional identity and competence, with an indirect effect of professional identity creation through self-efficacy accounting for 52% of the total effect.Conclusions Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between professional identity and competence to some extent. School educators and clinical tutors should pay greater attention to students' professional identity and self-efficacy to improve students' competence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103252

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, X., Yu, L., Shen, Y., Kang, Z., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Central Hospital of Zibo (CN)
Corresponding author
Yao, Xiuyu
Venue
Nurse Education in Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
57
Pages
103252
ISSN
1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214499293
Cited by
78
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
self-efficacy, professional identity, nursing competencies, nursing students, clinical internship, mediating effect, nursing education, clinical instructors
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Internship and Residency, Professional Competence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Nursing, Self Efficacy, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review