Cited by 51Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomics and Rare DiseasesEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Rett syndrome and the urge of novel approaches to study MeCP2 functions and mechanisms of action

Bedogni, Francesco, Rossi, Riccardo L., Galli, Francesco, Cobolli Gigli, Clementina, Gandaglia, Anna, Kilstrup-Nielsen, Charlotte, Landsberger, Nicoletta·2014·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a devastating genetic disorder that worldwide represents the most common genetic cause of severe intellectual disability in females. Most cases are caused by mutations in the X-linked MECP2 gene. Several recent studies have demonstrated that RTT mimicking animal models do not develop an irreversible condition and phenotypic rescue is possible. However, no cure for RTT has been identified so far, and patients are only given symptomatic and supportive treatments. The development of clinical applications imposes a more comprehensive knowledge of MeCP2 functional role(s) and their relevance for RTT pathobiology. Herein, we thoroughly survey the knowledge about MeCP2 structure and functions, highlighting the necessity of identifying more functional domains and the value of molecular genetics. Given that, in our opinion, RTT ultimately is generated by perturbations in gene transcription and so far no genes/pathways have been consistently linked to a dysfunctional MeCP2, we have used higher-level bioinformatic analyses to identify commonly deregulated mechanisms in MeCP2-defective samples. In this review we present our results and discuss the possible value of the utilized approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.011

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bedogni, F., Rossi, R. L., Galli, F., Cobolli Gigli, C., Gandaglia, A., Kilstrup-Nielsen, C., & Landsberger, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Insubria (IT)
  • Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
Corresponding author
Landsberger, Nicoletta
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
46
Pages
187-201
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987829135
Cited by
51
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondazione Cariplo (2010-0724, FP7-PEOPLE-ITN-2008)
  • Jerome Lejeune Foundation
  • Fondazione Telethon (GGP10032)
  • IRSF
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
Rett syndrome, MeCP2, MECP2 mutations, X-linked intellectual disability, transcriptional regulation, phenotypic rescue
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Signal Transduction, Rett Syndrome, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Computational Biology, Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review