Cited by 207Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Neuropathology of Rett syndrome

Armstrong, D. D.·2005·Journal of Child Neurology

Abstract

The neuropathology of the Rett syndrome is summarized utilizing a format of clinical pathological correlations, describing the pathology at specific anatomic sites which could correlate with the well defined clinical signs and symptoms in the Rett syndrome; decreased head and body size, autism, gait dysfunction, spasticity, movement and breathing disorder. Published reports of altered morphology in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, substantia nigra, cerebellum, spinal cord, muscle, nerve, pituitary gland and somatic organs are supplemented by the author's observations. These include studies of dendritic morphology employing Scholl analysis of Golgi preparation, and quantitation of cerebellar Purkinje cells. The possible pathoetiology of the Rett syndrome is considered, particularly, in relation to the ultrastructural demonstration of altered mitochondria and accumulations of lipidic bodies in several tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/08830738050200082401

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These effects, together with spine elongation, suggest a phenotype of reduced or delayed synapse maturation reminiscent of fragile X, Rett, and Angelman syndrome models.

    “These effects, together with spine elongation, suggests a phenotype of reduced or delayed synapse maturation that is reminiscent of the phenotypes observed in mouse models of fragile X syndrome (Comery et al., 1997; Irwin et al., 2001), Rett syndrome (Armstrong, 2005; Belichenko et al., 2009; Chao et al., 2007), and Angelman syndrome (Dindot et al., 2008; Sato and Stryker, 2010; Yashiro et al., 2”

    From Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice (2013) · cites this paper as Armstrong, 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, D. D.
Corresponding author
Armstrong, D. D.
Venue
Journal of Child Neurology
Published
2005-08-01
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
747-753
ISSN
0883-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2397166584
Cited by
207
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH31892)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
Rett syndrome, neuropathology, clinicopathological correlation, cerebral cortex morphology, basal ganglia, substantia nigra, cerebellum, spinal cord, muscle pathology, pituitary gland, dendritic morphology, Purkinje cells, mitochondrial ultrastructure, autism spectrum disorder, spasticity, gait disturbance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review