Cited by 105Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Neurofilament light chain protein in neurodegenerative dementia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Zhao, Yinan, Xin, Yanguo, Meng, Su, He, Zhiyi, Hu, Wenyu·2019·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The diagnostic value of neurofilament light chain protein in neurodegenerative dementia diseases is still controversial. A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant case-control studies conducted through October 2018. Traditional and net meta-analyses were performed based on 42 studies that tested the diagnostic performance of neurofilament light chain protein (NfL) concentration in CSF and serum/plasma from patients with neurodegenerative dementia. CSF and serum/plasma NfL levels were significantly increased in patients with neurodegenerative dementia diseases. Network meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in CSF NfL levels during mild cognitive impairment, whereas an increase was observed in vascular dementia compared to Alzheimer's disease. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve and cluster analysis showed that the NfL concentration in CSF (vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia, and Alzheimer's disease) and serum/plasma (frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease) ranked first among neurodegenerative dementia diseases. NfL is an important biomarker that can help clinical neurologists make early diagnoses of neurodegenerative diseases, so patients can receive prompt treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.014

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Xin, Y., Meng, S., He, Z., & Hu, W.
Affiliations
First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, Wenyu
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
102
Pages
123-138
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940916069
Cited by
105
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
neurofilament light chain, neurodegenerative dementia, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia, mild cognitive impairment, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, diagnostic accuracy, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Dementia, Vascular, Biomarkers, Neurofilament Proteins, Lewy Body Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review