Cited by 738Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlNeural Networks and Applications

Natural Actor-Critic

Peters, Jan, Schaal, Stefan·2008·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2007.11.026

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, J., & Schaal, S.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Peters, Jan
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
71
Issue
7-9
Pages
1180-1190
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172968643
Cited by
738
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 55
FWCI
60.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
natural actor-critic, natural policy gradient, actor-critic algorithms, value function approximation, linear regression, learning control, robotic arm control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review