The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data
Open accessAbstract
We are seeing an enormous increase in the availability of streaming, time-series data. Largely driven by the rise of connected real-time data sources, this data presents technical challenges and opportunities. One fundamental capability for streaming analytics is to model each stream in an unsupervised fashion and detect unusual, anomalous behaviors in real-time. Early anomaly detection is valuable, yet it can be difficult to execute reliably in practice. Application constraints require systems to process data in real-time, not batches. Streaming data inherently exhibits concept drift, favoring algorithms that learn continuously. Furthermore, the massive number of independent streams in practice requires that anomaly detectors be fully automated. In this paper we propose a novel anomaly detection algorithm that meets these constraints. The technique is based on an online sequence memory algorithm called Hierarchical Temporal Memory (HTM). We also present results using the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB), a benchmark containing real-world data streams with labeled anomalies. The benchmark, the first of its kind, provides a controlled open-source environment for testing anomaly detection algorithms on streaming data. We present results and analysis for a wide range of algorithms on this benchmark, and discuss future challenges for the emerging field of streaming analytics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A survey on concept drift adaptation
Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2523813 · Cited by 3,735
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 · Cited by 1,649
Distributed Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Networked Industrial Sensing Systems
Chen, P.-Y., Yang, S., & McCann, J. A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2350451 · Cited by 148
Multivariate Online Anomaly Detection Using Kernel Recursive Least Squares
Ahmed, T., Coates, M., & Lakhina, A. (2007) · IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications · doi:10.1109/infcom.2007.79 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding
Hundman, K., Constantinou, V., Laporte, C., Colwell, I., & Soderstrom, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219845 · Cited by 1,771
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
A Review on Outlier/Anomaly Detection in Time Series Data
Blázquez-García, A., Conde, A., Mori, U., & Lozano, J. A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3444690 · Cited by 1,102
A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detection
Ruff, L., Kauffmann, J. R., Vandermeulen, R. A., Montavon, G., Samek, W., Kloft, M., Dietterich, T. G., & Muller, K.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3052449 · Cited by 914
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, S., Lavin, A., Purdy, S., & Agha, Z.
- Venue
- Neurocomputing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 262
- Pages
- 134-147
- ISSN
- 0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2620661538
- Cited by
- 995
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 50.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.070
- The paper
- Ahmad, S., Lavin, A., Purdy, S., & Agha, Z. (2017). Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data. Neurocomputing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.