The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-head CNN–RNN for multi-time series anomaly detection: An industrial case study
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Detecting anomalies in time series data is becoming mainstream in a wide variety of industrial applications in which sensors monitor expensive machinery. The complexity of this task increases when multiple heterogeneous sensors provide information of different nature, scales and frequencies from the same machine. Traditionally, machine learning techniques require a separate data pre-processing before training, which tends to be very time-consuming and often requires domain knowledge. Recent deep learning approaches have shown to perform well on raw time series data, eliminating the need for pre-processing. In this work, we propose a deep learning based approach for supervised multi-time series anomaly detection that combines a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) in different ways. Unlike other approaches, we use independent CNNs, so-called convolutional heads, to deal with anomaly detection in multi-sensor systems. We address each sensor individually avoiding the need for data pre-processing and allowing for a more tailored architecture for each type of sensor. We refer to this architecture as Multi-head CNN–RNN. The proposed architecture is assessed against a real industrial case study, provided by an industrial partner, where a service elevator is monitored. Within this case study, three type of anomalies are considered: point, context-specific, and collective.The experimental results show that the proposed architecture is suitable for multi-time series anomaly detection as it obtained promising results on the real industrial scenario.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 14,214
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising
Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D., & Zhang, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2662206 · Cited by 8,983
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Cited by
Fink, O., Wang, Q., Svensén, M., Dersin, P., Lee, W.-J., & Ducoffe, M. (2020) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103678 · Cited by 549
A survey on anomaly detection for technical systems using LSTM networks
Lindemann, B., Maschler, B., Sahlab, N., & Weyrich, M. (2021) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2021.103498 · Cited by 445
Multi-input CNN-GRU based human activity recognition using wearable sensors
Dua, N., Singh, S. N., & Semwal, V. B. (2021) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-021-00928-8 · Cited by 432
DCdetector: Dual Attention Contrastive Representation Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detection
Yang, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, T., Wen, Q., & Sun, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599295 · Cited by 387
Real-World Anomaly Detection by Using Digital Twin Systems and Weakly Supervised Learning
Castellani, A., Schmitt, S., & Squartini, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3019788 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Canizo, M., Triguero, I., Conde, A., & Onieva, E.
- Venue
- Neurocomputing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 363
- Pages
- 246-260
- ISSN
- 0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964336507
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-head CNN–RNN for multi-time series anomaly detection: An industrial case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.034
- The paper
- Canizo, M., Triguero, I., Conde, A., & Onieva, E. (2019). Multi-head CNN–RNN for multi-time series anomaly detection: An industrial case study. Neurocomputing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.