Cited by 21Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security Solutions

A comprehensive survey and taxonomy on privacy-preserving deep learning

Open access
Tran, Anh-Tu, Luong, The-Dung, Huynh, Van-Nam·2024·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127345

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tran, A.-T., Luong, T.-D., & Huynh, V.-N.
Affiliations
  • Academy of Cryptography Techniques (VN)
  • Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Huynh, Van-Nam
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
576
Pages
127345
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391427119
Cited by
21
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Neurocomputing (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
  • ONR (N62909-23-1-2058)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
privacy-preserving deep learning, data privacy, evaluation criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review