Cited by 315Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningCryptography and Data Security

Model inversion attacks against collaborative inference

He, Zecheng, Zhang, Tianwei, Lee, Ruby B.·2019·Proceedings of the 35th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference

Abstract

The prevalence of deep learning has drawn attention to the privacy protection of sensitive data. Various privacy threats have been presented, where an adversary can steal model owners' private data. Meanwhile, countermeasures have also been introduced to achieve privacy-preserving deep learning. However, most studies only focused on data privacy during training, and ignored privacy during inference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3359789.3359824

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On its own, federated learning is an insufficient measure of privacy preservation.

    “a number of works suggest5–7 that on its own, federated learning is an insufficient measure of privacy preservation.”

    From Medical imaging deep learning with differential privacy (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, Z., Zhang, T., & Lee, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
Proceedings of the 35th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-12-09
Pages
148-162
ISSN
1063-9527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2989885118
Cited by
313
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 16
FWCI
8.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
model inversion attacks, collaborative inference, inference privacy, privacy-preserving deep learning, data privacy, adversarial attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review