CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 640Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security Solutions

A Comprehensive Survey of Privacy-preserving Federated Learning: A Taxonomy, Review, and Future Directions

Open access
Yin, Xuefei, Zhu, Yanming, Hu, Jiankun·2022·ACM Computing Surveys
DOI 10.1145/3460427
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The past four years have witnessed the rapid development of federated learning (FL). However, new privacy concerns have also emerged during the aggregation of the distributed intermediate results. The emerging privacy-preserving FL (PPFL) has been heralded as a solution to generic privacy-preserving machine learning. However, the challenge of protecting data privacy while maintaining the data utility through machine learning still remains. In this article, we present a comprehensive and systematic survey on the PPFL based on our proposed 5W-scenario-based taxonomy. We analyze the privacy leakage risks in the FL from five aspects, summarize existing methods, and identify future research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3460427

Cites

128 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 133 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. M. Abadi, A. Chu, I. Goodfellow, H. B. McMahan, I. Mironov, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang. 2016. Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 308-318.
  2. D. Agrawal and C. Aggarwal. 2001. On the design and quantification of privacy preserving data mining algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. 247-255.
  3. A. Ahmed and E. Ahmed. 2016. A survey on mobile edge computing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control. 1-8.
  4. K. Amin, A. Kulesza, A. Munoz, and S. Vassilvtiskii. 2019. Bounding user contributions: A bias-variance trade-off in differential privacy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 97. 263-271.
  5. A. N. Bhagoji, S. Chakraborty, P. Mittal, and S. Calo. 2019. Analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 97. 634-643.
  6. S. Bickel, M. Brückner, and T. Scheffer. 2007. Discriminative learning for differing training and test distributions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 81-88.
  7. Alon Brutzkus, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, and Oren Elisha. 2019. Low latency privacy preserving inference. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 97. 812-821.
  8. N. Carlini, C. Liu, Ú. Erlingsson, J. Kos, and D. Song. 2019. The secret sharer: Evaluating and testing unintended memorization in neural networks. In Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium. 267-284.
  9. H. Chang, V. Shejwalkar, R. Shokri, and A. Houmansadr. 2019. Cronus: Robust and heterogeneous collaborative learning with black-box knowledge transfer. arXiv:1912.11279. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11279. · arXiv
  10. Hong-You Chen and Wei-Lun Chao. 2021. FedBE: Making bayesian model ensemble applicable to federated learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
  11. Beongjun Choi, Jy yong Sohn, Dong-Jun Han, and Jaekyun Moon. 2020. Communication-computation efficient se- cure aggregation for federated learning. arXiv:2012.05433. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.05433. · arXiv
  12. C. Choquette-Choo, N. Dullerud, A. Dziedzic, et al. 2021. CaPC learning: Confidential and private collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
  13. Olivia Choudhury, Aris Gkoulalas-Divanis, Theodoros Salonidis, et al. 2019. Differential privacy-enabled federated learning for sensitive health data. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS Workshop on Machine Learning for Health.
  14. O. Choudhury, A. Gkoulalas-Divanis, T. Salonidis, I. Sylla, Y. Park, G. Hsu, and A. Das. 2020. A syntactic approach for privacy-preserving federated learning. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  15. G. Cormode, S. Jha, T. Kulkarni, N. Li, D. Srivastava, and T. Wang. 2018. Privacy at Scale: Local differential privacy in practice. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data. 1655-1658.
  16. W. Dai, Q. Yang, G. Xue, and Y. Yu. 2007. Boosting for transfer learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 193-200.
  17. J. Devlin, M. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for lan- guage understanding. arXiv:1810.04805. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805. · arXiv
  18. Y. Dong, X. Chen, L. Shen, and D. Wang. 2019. Privacy-preserving distributed machine learning based on secret sharing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communications Security. 684-702.
  19. C. Dwork, G. N. Rothblum, and S. Vadhan. 2010. Boosting and differential privacy. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 51-60.
  20. A. Elgabli, J. Park, C. Ben Issaid, and M. Bennis. 2021. Harnessing wireless channels for scalable and privacy- preserving federated learning. IEEE Transactions on Communications (2021).
  21. D. Enthoven and Z. Al-Ars. 2020. An overview of federated deep learning privacy attacks and eefensive strategies. arXiv:2004.04676. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04676. · arXiv
  22. S. Feng and H. Yu. 2020. Multi-participant multi-class vertical federated learning. arXiv:2001.11154. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11154. · arXiv
  23. Y. Feng, X. Yang, W. Fang, S. Xia, and X. Tang. 2020. Practical and bilateral privacy-preserving federated learning. arXiv:2002.09843. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09843. · arXiv
  24. M. Fredrikson, E. Lantz, S. Jha, S. Lin, D. Page, and T. Ristenpart. 2014. Privacy in Pharmacogenetics: an end-to-end case study of personalized warfarin dosing. In Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium. 17-32.
  25. Clement Fung, Jamie Koerner, Stewart Grant, and Ivan Beschastnikh. 2019. Dancing in the dark: Private multi-party machine learning in an untrusted setting. arXiv:1811.09712. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09712. · arXiv
  26. S. Gade and N. Vaidya. 2018. Privacy-Preserving distributed learning via obfuscated stochastic gradients. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 184-191.
  27. J. Gao, W. Fan, J. Jiang, and J. Han. 2008. Knowledge transfer via multiple model local structure mapping. In Proceed- ings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 283-291.
  28. C. Gentry, A. Sahai, and B. Waters. 2013. Homomorphic encryption from learning with errors: Conceptually-simpler, asymptotically-faster, attribute-based. In Proceedings of the Annual Cryptology Conference. 75-92.
  29. Robin C. Geyer, Tassilo Klein, and Moin Nabi. 2018. Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspec- tive. arXiv:1712.07557. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07557. · arXiv
  30. R. Gilad-Bachrach, N. Dowlin, K. Laine, et al. 2016. CryptoNets: Applying neural networks to encrypted data with high throughput and accuracy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 201-210.
  31. O. Goldreich, S. Micali, and A. Wigderson. 1987. How to play any mental game. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 218-229.
  32. M. Gong, Y. Xie, K. Pan, K. Feng, and A. K. Qin. 2020. A survey on differentially private machine learning. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 15, 2 (2020), 49-64.
  33. Jenny Hamer, Mehryar Mohri, and Ananda Theertha Suresh. 2020. FedBoost: A communication-efficient algorithm for federated learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 119. 3973-3983.
  34. J. Hayes, L. Melis, G. Danezis, and E. De Cristofaro. 2019. LOGAN: Membership inference attacks against generative models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. 133-152.
  35. B. Hitaj, G. Ateniese, and F. Perez-Cruz. 2017. Deep Models under the GAN: Information leakage from collaborative deep learning. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 603-618.
  36. S. Janbaz, R. Asghari, B. Bagherpour, and A. Zaghian. 2020. A fast non-interactive publicly verifiable secret sharing scheme. In Proceedings of the International ISC Conference on Information Security and Cryptology. 7-13.
  37. P. Kairouz, H. B. McMahan, B. Avent, et al. 2019. Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 14, 1 (2021).
  38. M. Kapralov and K. Talwar. 2013. On differentially private low rank approximation. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 1395-1414.
  39. S. P. Karimireddy, S. Kale, M. Mohri, S. Reddi, S. Stich, and A. T. Suresh. 2020. SCAFFOLD: Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 119. 5132-5143.
  40. A. Kawachi, K. Tanaka, and K. Xagawa. 2007. Multi-bit cryptosystems based on lattice problems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Public Key Cryptography. 315-329.
  41. S. Lee, V. Chatalbashev, D. Vickrey, and D. Koller. 2007. Learning a meta-level prior for feature relevance from multiple related tasks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 489-496.
  42. J. Li, M. Khodak, S. Caldas, and A. Talwalkar. 2019. Differentially private meta-learning. In Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations.
  43. Q. Li, Z. Wen, and B. He. 2020. Practical federated gradient boosting decision trees. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 4642-4649.
  44. Q. Li, Z. Wen, Z. Wu, S. Hu, N. Wang, and B. He. 2021. A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. arXiv:1907.09693. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09693. · arXiv
  45. Xiaoxiao Li, Meirui Jiang, Xiaofei Zhang, Michael Kamp, and Qi Dou. 2021. FedBN: Federated learning on non-iid features via local batch normalization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
  46. Z. Li and Y. Zhang. 2021. Label-leaks: Membership inference attack with label. arXiv:2007.15528. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15528. · arXiv
  47. G. Liang and S. Chawathe. 2004. Privacy-preserving inter-database operations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics. 66-82.
  48. D. Liu, T. Miller, R. Sayeed, and K. Mandl. 2018. FADL: Federated-autonomous deep learning for distributed electronic health record. arXiv:1811.11400. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11400. · arXiv
  49. R. Liu, Y. Cao, M. Yoshikawa, and H. Chen. 2020. FedSel: Federated SGD under Local Differential privacy with top-k dimension selection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications.
  50. H. Lu, C. Liu, T. He, S. Wang, and K. Chan. 2020. Sharing models or coresets: A study based on membership inference attack. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Federated Learning for User Privacy and Data Confidentiality.
  51. S. Lu, Y. Zhang, and Y. Wang. 2020. Decentralized federated learning for electronic health records. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 1-5.
  52. L. Lyu, H. Yu, and Q. Yang. 2020. Threats to federated learning: A survey. arXiv:2003.02133. Retrieved from https: //arxiv.org/abs/2003.02133. · arXiv
  53. A. Machanavajjhala, D. Kifer, J. Gehrke, and M. Venkitasubramaniam. 2007. l -Diversity: Privacy beyond k -anonymity. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1, 1 (2007), Article 3.
  54. G. Malinovskiy, D. Kovalev, E. Gasanov, L. Condat, and P. Richtarik. 2020. From local sgd to local fixed-point methods for federated learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 119. 6692-6701.
  55. H. B. McMahan, D. Ramage, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang. 2018. Learning differentially private recurrent language models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
  56. L. Melis, C. Song, E. De Cristofaro, and V. Shmatikov. 2019. Exploiting unintended feature leakage in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 691-706.
  57. P. Mohassel and P. Rindal. 2018. ABY 3 : A mixed protocol framework for machine learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 35-52.
  58. Vaikkunth Mugunthan, Anton Peraire-Bueno, and Lalana Kagal. 2020. PrivacyFL: A simulator for privacy-preserving and secure federated learning. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Man- agement. 3085-3092.
  59. Vaikkunth Mugunthan, Antigoni Polychroniadou, David Byrd, and Tucker Hybinette Balch. 2019. Smpai: Secure multi-party computation for federated learning. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS 2019 Workshop on Robust AI in Financial Services.
  60. T. Orekondy, S. Oh, Y. Zhang, et al. 2019. Gradient-leaks: Understanding and controlling deanonymization in feder- ated learning. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS Workshop on Federated Learning for Data Privacy and Confidentiality.
  61. L. T. Phong, Y. Aono, T. Hayashi, L. H. Wang, and S. Moriai. 2018. Privacy-preserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 13, 5 (2018), 1333-1345.
  62. Anastasia Pustozerova and Rudolf Mayer. 2020. Information leaks in federated learning. In Proceedings of the Work- shop on Decentralized IoT Systems and Security.
  63. D. Reich, A. Todoki, R. Dowsley, et al. 2019. Privacy-preserving classification of personal text messages with secure multi-party computation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 32. 3757-3769.
  64. M. S. Riazi, K. Laine, B. Pelton, and W. Dai. 2020. HEAX: An architecture for computing on encrypted data. In Pro- ceedings of the International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. 1295-1309.
  65. D. Rothchild, A. Panda, E. Ullah, et al. 2020. FetchSGD: Communication-efficient federated learning with sketching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 119. 8253-8265.
  66. A. G. Roy, S. Siddiqui, et al. 2019. Braintorrent: A peer-to-peer environment for decentralized federated learning. arXiv:1905.06731. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06731. · arXiv
  67. A. Sannai. 2018. Reconstruction of training samples from loss functions. arXiv:1805.07337. Retrieved from https: //arxiv.org/abs/1805.07337. · arXiv
  68. R. Shokri, M. Stronati, C. Song, and V. Shmatikov. 2017. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 3-18.
  69. David Silver, Julian Schrittwieser, Karen Simonyan, et al. 2017. Mastering the Game of Go without human knowledge. Nature 550, 7676 (2017), 354-359.
  70. A. Singh, P. Vepakomma, O. Gupta, and R. Raskar. 2019. Detailed comparison of communication efficiency of split learning and federated learning. arXiv:1909.09145. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.09145. · arXiv
  71. W. Stallings. 2017. Cryptography and Network Security Principles and Practices (7th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
  72. Lili Su and Jiaming Xu. 2019. Securing distributed gradient descent in high dimensional statistical learning. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst. 3, 1 (2019), Article 12.
  73. L. Sun, J. Qian, X. Chen, and P. Yu. 2020. LDP-FL: Practical private aggregation in federated learning with local differential privacy. arXiv:2007.15789. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15789. · arXiv
  74. T. Szatmari, M. Petersen, M. Korzepa, and T. Giannetsos. 2020. Modelling audiological preferences using federated learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. 187-190.
  75. H. Tanuwidjaja, R. Choi, and K. Kim. 2019. A survey on deep learning techniques for privacy-preserving. In Proceed- ings of the International Conference on Machine Learning for Cyber Security. 29-46.
  76. A. Triastcyn and B. Faltings. 2019. Federated learning with bayesian differential privacy. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data. 2587-2596.
  77. S. Truex, L. Liu, K. Chow, M. Gursoy, and W. Wei. 2020. LDP-Fed: Federated learning with local differential privacy. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Edge Systems, Analytics and Networking. 61-66.
  78. M. Van Dijk, C. Gentry, S. Halevi, and V. Vaikuntanathan. 2010. Fully homomorphic encryption over the integers. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. 24-43.
  79. P. Vepakomma, O. Gupta, T. Swedish, and R. Raskar. 2018. Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient data. arXiv:1812.00564. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00564. · arXiv
  80. C. Wang and S. Mahadevan. 2008. manifold alignment using procrustes analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 1120-1127.
  81. G. Wang, C. X. Dang, and Z. Zhou. 2019. Measure contribution of participants in federated learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data. 2597-2604.
  82. Lixu Wang, Shichao Xu, Xiao Wang, and Qi Zhu. 2019. Eavesdrop the composition proportion of training labels in federated learning. arXiv:1910.06044. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.06044. · arXiv
  83. Y. Wang, Y. Tong, and D. Shi. 2020. Federated latent dirichlet allocation: A local differential privacy based framework. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 6283-6290.
  84. Z. Wang, M. Song, Z. Zhang, Y. Song, Q. Wang, and H. Qi. 2019. Beyond inferring class representatives: User- level privacy leakage from federated learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 2512-2520.
  85. W. Wei, L. Liu, M. Loper, K. Chow, M. Gursoy, S. Truex, and Y. Wu. 2020. A framework for evaluating client privacy leakages in federated learning. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. 545-566.
  86. Chulin Xie, Keli Huang, Pin-Yu Chen, and Bo Li. 2020. DBA: Distributed backdoor attacks against federated learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
  87. R. Xu, N. Baracaldo, Y. Zhou, A. Anwar, and H. Ludwig. 2019. Hybridalpha: An efficient approach for privacy- preserving federated learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security. 13-23.
  88. K. Yang, T. Fan, T. Chen, Y. Shi, and Q. Yang. 2019. A quasi-Newton method based vertical federated learning frame- work for logistic regression. arXiv:1912.00513. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.00513. · arXiv
  89. S. Yang et al. 2019. Parallel distributed logistic regression for vertical federated learning without third-party coordina- tor. In Proceedings of the IJCAI'19 Workshop on Federated Machine Learning for User Privacy and Data Confidentiality.
  90. Tehrim Yoon, Sumin Shin, Sung Ju Hwang, and Eunho Yang. 2021. Fedmix: Approximation of mixup under mean augmented federated learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
  91. Chen Yu, Hanlin Tang, Cedric Renggli, Simon Kassing, Ankit Singla, Dan Alistarh, Ce Zhang, and Ji Liu. 2019. Distributed learning over unreliable networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 7202-7212.
  92. Felix Yu, Ankit Singh Rawat, Aditya Menon, and Sanjiv Kumar. 2020. Federated learning with only positive labels. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 10946-10956.
  93. H. Yu et al. 2019. Parallel restarted sgd with faster convergence and less communication: demystifying why model averaging works for deep learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 5693-5700.
  94. V. Zantedeschi, A. Bellet, and M. Tommasi. 2020. Fully Decentralized joint learning of personalized models and collaboration graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 864-874.
  95. C. Zhang, S. Li, J. Xia, W. Wang, F. Yan, and Y. Liu. 2020. Batchcrypt: Efficient homomorphic encryption for cross-silo federated learning. In Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 493-506.
  96. D. Zhang, X. Chen, D. Wang, and J. Shi. 2018. A survey on collaborative deep learning and privacy-preserving. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace. 652-658.
  97. J. Zhang, B. Chen, S. Yu, and H. Deng. 2019. PEFL: A privacy-enhanced federated learning scheme for big data analytics. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference. 1-6.
  98. X. Zhang, A. Fu, H. Wang, C. Zhou, and Z. Chen. 2020. A privacy-preserving and verifiable federated learning scheme. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. 1-6.
  99. H. Zhu, Z. Li, M. Cheah, and M. Goh. 2020. Privacy-preserving weighted federated learning within oracle-aided MPC framework. arXiv:2003.07630. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07630. · arXiv
  100. Y. Zhu and E. Meijering. 2020. neural architecture search for microscopy cell segmentation. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. 542-551.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Yin, X., Zhu, Y., & Hu, J.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Canberra (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
ORCID
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Published
2021-07-13
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
DOI
10.1145/3460427
OpenAlex
W3180608480
Cited by
638
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 5
FWCI
31.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
ARC (DP190103660;LP180100663)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
privacy-preserving federated learning, federated learning, privacy leakage, data privacy, data utility, model aggregation, privacy-preserving machine learning, taxonomy (general classification scheme)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review