Cited by 20Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

A survey on collaborative hunting with robotic swarm: Key technologies and application scenarios

Cai, Wenyu, Chen, Hao, Zhang, Meiyan·2024·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, W., Chen, H., & Zhang, M.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University of Water Resource and Electric Power (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Meiyan
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
598
Pages
128008
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399597132
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LZ22F010004, LZJWY22E090001)
  • Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2023C01028)
  • NSFC (61871163, 62271179)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
swarm robotics, agent cooperation, target search, task allocation, hunting strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review