Cited by 13Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Lightweight deep learning for visual perception: A survey of models, compression strategies, and edge deployment challenges

Open access
Raza, Syed Muhammad, Abidi, Syed Murtaza Hussain, Masuduzzaman, Md, Shin, Soo Young·2025·Neurocomputing

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The increasing demand for the deployment of deep neural networks (DNNs) in edge devices has led to the development of lightweight deep learning (LDL) models designed to operate efficiently under resource constraints. Although DNNs have achieved remarkable success in various applications, their high computational requirements often limit their deployment on devices with restricted memory and processing power. This challenge has motivated researchers to develop optimized LDL models that balance accuracy, speed, and efficiency while maintaining competitive performance. Despite existing surveys covering specific aspects of LDL models, a comprehensive review encompassing image classification, object detection, and segmentation remains limited. This proposed survey systematically explores recent advancements in LDL models, highlighting their architectures, optimization techniques, and real-world applications.This survey conducts an empirical evaluation by testing latest state-of-the-art LDL models on the Jetson Orin edge device using benchmark datasets: ImageNet for classification, VisDrone for object detection, and COCO for segmentation. The experimental analysis focuses on key performance metrics, including inference speed, model accuracy, and computational efficiency, while comparing LDL models with their conventional counterparts. This study provides a holistic understanding of the role of LDL models in edge computing, providing insight into emerging trends, challenges, and future research directions in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131357

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Raza, S. M., Abidi, S. M. H., Masuduzzaman, M., & Shin, S. Y.
Affiliations
  • Kumoh National Institute of Technology (KR)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Shin, Soo Young
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
656
Pages
131357
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413387550
Cited by
13
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (IITP-2025-RS-2024-00437190, IITP-2025-RS-2023-00259061)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
lightweight deep learning, edge deployment, model compression, edge computing, image classification, object detection, semantic segmentation, Jetson Orin, inference speed, computational efficiency, resource-constrained devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review