Cited by 171Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Bringing ai to edge: from deep learning’s perspective

Open access
Liu, Di, Kong, Hao, Luo, Xiangzhong, Liu, Weichen, Subramaniam, Ravi·2022·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.141

Cites

211 of 211 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 100 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    Most of the structure pruning methods discussed are rule-based, using heuristic algorithms according to their own criterion.

    “Most of the above-mentioned structure pruning methods are rule-based, i.e., some heuristic algorithms devised according to their own criterion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The correct class probability dominates the teacher network's output distribution, significantly limiting knowledge transfer.

    “the probability of the correct class dominates the probability distribution generated by the teacher network (e.g., [0.97, 0.1, 0.0, 0.2]), which significantly limits the knowledge transferring capability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The above-mentioned NAS approaches mainly search for the best operators for cells or layers, while width and depth are manually fine-tuned.

    “All of the above-mentioned approaches mainly search for the best operators for cells or layers where their width and depth are fine-tuned manually.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Existing NAS methods for edge intelligence systems suffer from a first flaw: most use platform-independent metrics such as FLOPs and MACs as constraints.

    “the majority of existing methods use platform-independent metrics, i.e., FLOPs and MACs as the constraint to design the model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The width and depth of a DNN have a critical impact on its accuracy and latency.

    “as shown in [50], the width and depth of a DNN have a critical impact on its accuracy and latency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    During run-time, DNN applications share computational units and communication bandwidth with other applications, so resource availability may significantly affect DNN inference time.

    “during the run-time, DNN applications share the computational units and communication bandwidth with other applications and as a result the availability of computing and communication resources may significantly affect DNNs' inference time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    ResNet-50 has 26 million parameter weights, generates 16 million activations per inference, requires about 168 MB memory, and needs at least 3 GB/s memory bandwidth.

    “ResNet-50 [7] has 26 million parameter weights, generates 16 million activations in one inference, requires around 168 MB memory space, and needs at lease 3GB/s memory bandwidth.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Almost all pruning methods are hardware-agnostic and rely on hardware-independent metrics such as MACs and FLOPs.

    “Almost all of pruning methods are hardware-agnostic and depend on hardware-independent metrics, like MACs and FLOPs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Post-training quantization is flexible and broadly applicable to existing DNN models.

    “Post-training quantization is flexible and can be broadly applied to existing DNN models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    On some hardware platforms, low-bit operations consume less energy and execute faster, so quantization reduces energy consumption and latency.

    “since operations with lowbit representation usually consume less energy and execute faster, quantization reduces energy consumption and latency as well on some hardware platforms [129].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [129] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Knowledge distillation is a model compression technique in which a compact student model learns from a complicated teacher model.

    “Knowledge distillation is another technique to conduct model compression, where a more compact student model can learn the knowledge from a complicated and powerful teacher model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A variety of hardware accelerators have emerged to boost DNN execution, and these systems differ in their ability to handle network complexity.

    “a diverse of hardware accelerators have emerged for boosting the execution of DNNs, but these various systems demonstrate different capability to handling network complication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Some edge systems are energy-constrained, battery powered, or supplied by sustainable energy, and energy variance changes system status such as frequency and power, affecting DNN inference time.

    “some edge systems are energy-constrained, battery powered or supplied by sustainable energy, like solar energy (intermittent computing [171]), and in these cases energy variance will change the system's status, such as scaling down frequency and power which affects the inference time of DNN applications as well.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [171] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Model compression provides a large-to-small method to generate efficient compact models from complex models for edge devices.

    “Model compression provides a 'large-to-small' method to generate an efficient and compact model from a complex model for edge devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Quantization has become a standard means to compress memory-hungry DNN models for resource-constrained edge systems.

    “Quantization has become a standard means to compress memory-hungry DNN models for resourceconstrained edge systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Neural architecture search has demonstrated the capability to design more accurate DNNs without tedious parameter tuning.

    “neural architecture search, which has demonstrated its capability to design more accurate DNNs without tedious parameter tuning”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Distilling knowledge from large networks can improve the accuracy of small models, which may be directly applicable to edge systems.

    “distilling knowledge from large networks can improve the accuracy of small models which may be directly applicable to edge systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [149]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Pruning is a well-studied topic in model compression, with many proposed methods.

    “Pruning is the well-studied topic in model compression and many methods have been proposed to advance the network pruning [103].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [103] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    NAS defines a new paradigm for designing DNN models, freeing designers from tedious hyperparameter tuning and automating costly DNN design.

    “NAS defines a new paradigm to design DNN models, frees DNN designers from tedious hyperparameter tuning and automates the costly DNN design procedure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    State-of-the-art DNN models have billions of parameters and produce large intermediate activation/feature maps that occupy large memory.

    “the state-of-the-art models have more than billions of parameters and at the same time during inference a model produces a large portion of intermediate results (activation/feature maps) which usually occupy a large memory space.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Network compression involves a costly and time-consuming compression-retraining procedure to retain the accuracy of the pruned model.

    “network compression involves a costly and time-consuming compression-retraining procedure to retain the accuracy of the pruned model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MnasNet and MobileNet V3 on Edge TPU have lower latency than a high-end desktop GPU.

    “MnasNet and MobileNet V3 on Edge TPU perform very low latency, even lower than the high-end GPU”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [53] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [45]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    DNN models are highly computation-intensive and are growing wider and deeper, with billions of parameters and millions of FLOPs.

    “However, DNN models, the current core component of artificial intelligence, are highly computation-intensive and are even growing 'wider' (more filters within a layer) and 'deeper' (more layers) with billions of parameters and millions of float point operations (FLOPs)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Adaptive DNN models are not systematically reviewed in previous articles.

    “we also discuss adaptive DNN models which are also not reviewed systematically in previous articles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Developing hardware accelerators or chips is costly, taking 30-80 million dollars and 2-3 years.

    “However, developing chips is a costly process, 30-80 million dollars and 2-3 years to develop [19].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Depth-wise separable convolution can significantly reduce computational complexity, shortening inference time on edge devices.

    “Depth-wise separable convolution can significantly reduce the computational complexity, thus shortening inference time on edge devices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [43]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Most of a CNN's time and resource use comes from its convolutional layers.

    “Convolutional layers account for the major resource and time cost of a CNN model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SqueezeNet reaches accuracy comparable to AlexNet but with much lower model complexity.

    “SqueezeNet achieves AlexNet-level accuracy while greatly reducing the model complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Software approaches to bridge the computational gap include light-weight DNN model design, model compression, and NAS.

    “Different methodologies are devised to approach this goal, like novel light-weight DNN model design, model compression, and the emergent neural architecture search (NAS) [22]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cloud-based DNN inference has latency and privacy problems that matter in certain settings.

    “However, inference from cloud suffers from responsiveness (e.g., latency) and privacy issues which are critical in some scenarios.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Certain edge accelerators trade generality for efficiency; for example, edge TPU handles only a limited set of operators, and some newer DNN architectures are not well supported.

    “some customized edge accelerators achieve high efficiency at the cost of generality, e.g., edge TPU only supports a limited number of operators [21] and some new DNN architectures cannot be wellsupported.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Edge systems are less capable and resource-constrained compared with DNN computational demands.

    “less-capable edge systems”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · plain
      “resource-constrained edge systems”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Standard hardware and software handle compressed sparse formats poorly, so sparsified DNNs need specialized libraries and hardware.

    “The off-the-shelf hardware and software cannot efficiently execute those compressed formats, so specialized hardware and software libraries are required to execute sparsified DNN models [83], [84].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [83]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [84] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The accuracy of a pruned model is inherently upper bounded by the pre-trained model; a compressed model cannot be more accurate than the pre-trained model.

    “the accuracy of the pruned model is inherently upper bounded by the pre-trained model, i.e., the compressed model cannot have better accuracy than the pre-trained model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Because one-stage detectors need less computation than two-stage ones, the surveyed efficiency methods focus on one-stage detection.

    “Since onestage methods are less computational than two-stage methods, all of these methods mentioned above target one-stage method for improving efficiency of object detection DNNs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    Deep Compression shrinks model size substantially while losing little or no accuracy.

    “Experimental results show deep compression can significantly reduce the model size with no or negligible accuracy loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [75] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [76]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Quantization can fit an entire model into on-chip memory of edge devices, mitigating off-chip memory access overhead.

    “it is capable of fitting the whole model into on-chip memory of edge devices such that the high overhead occurred by off-chip memory access can be mitigated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One-stage detectors can exchange accuracy for speed, yet their real edge deployment still underperforms expectations.

    “The one-stage approaches can trade off accuracy for efficiency, but the practical deployment on edge devices is still behind the expected performance [70].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Deep Compression uses pruning, quantization, and Huffman encoding to compress over-parameterized DNNs.

    “Deep Compression uses three steps, prunning, quantization, and Huffman Encoding, to compress over-parameterized DNN models, such as VGG [77], AlexNet [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [75] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [76]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Two-stage detectors are accurate but inefficient; even on strong GPUs they may miss real-time targets such as 25 fps for video.

    “The two-stages methods provide high accuracy at the cost of efficiency, and even on powerful GPUs they cannot guarantee real-time constraints (e.g., 25fps for video).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation can be used together and are frequently combined.

    “It is worthy noting that the three approaches are not mutual exclusive to each other and in many cases they are combined to maximally compress the redundant models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Structured pruning keeps a regular layout by dropping low-impact channels or filters, allowing the compressed model to speed up inference on ordinary hardware without special libraries.

    “Since structured pruning does not lead to irregular pattern, the compressed network pruned by structure pruning can directly accelerate its inference on off-theshelf hardware platforms without specialized software library support.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Different layers serve different functions, so using different pruning criteria at different layers is likely beneficial.

    “different layers have different functions, thereby likely benefiting from employing different pruning criteria at different layers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Different layers have different functions.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Edge systems can update models locally using incremental learning to improve accuracy for new data and infer unknown classes.

    “edge systems can update models locally by using incremental learning [226] [227], where techniques in [228] are deployed to improve the accuracy for new data and infer unknown classes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [226] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [227]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [228] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Accuracy of DNN models is highly related to their width (channels or feature maps) and depth (layers or blocks).

    “It is known that accuracy of DNN models are highly related to its width (channels or feature maps) and depth (layers or blocks) [50]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    DL algorithms are approaching the computational limits of computing systems.

    “As stated in [40], DL algorithms are approaching the computational limits of computing systems”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Such variance may affect QoS for applications without strict temporal requirements and may have catastrophic consequences for real-time applications.

    “Such variance may influence the quality of service (QoS) of applications without rigorously temporal requirement, like voice recognition, face recognition, machine translation, etc [20] and on the other hand may lead to catastrophic consequence for those with rigorously temporal requirement, (i.e., real-time requirement), like autonomous driving, UAV, etc.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    FNAS can achieve the same accuracy under different resource constraints while significantly reducing search cost and inference latency.

    “FNAS can achieve the same accuracy level under different resource constraints, while significantly reducing the search cost and inference latency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [204]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Breakthroughs in hardware architecture will bring DNNs to a new level and boost DNN adoption.

    “The academia and industry have a consensus that the breakthroughs in hardware architecture will bring DNNs to a new level and boost DNN adoption [15] [205].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [205] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Attention mechanisms up-weight areas of interest to improve model accuracy.

    “Attention technique mimics human visual systems to locate their focal point on the important area and up-weights the areas of interest to improve the model accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [174] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An efficient point-voxel CNN is proposed for efficient 3D learning and can help implement 3D AR/VR applications and SLAM of autonomous driving on edge systems.

    “Like [218], an efficient point-voxel CNN is proposed for efficient 3D learning, and this model can help to implement 3D AR/VR applications and SLAM [219] of autonomous driving on edge systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [218] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [219] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A recent study raises concern about the environmental effect of training complex NLP models.

    “a recent study in [9] raises a concern regarding the environment effect of training complex NLP models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Federated learning allows clients to share learned gradients instead of data, which does not leak data.

    “instead of sharing the data with a centralized server clients (e.g., an edge system) in FL only share the learned gradient with others which will not leak data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [229] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Few works study incremental learning and federated learning with edge systems, and research in this context is still in its infancy.

    “Recently, few works study to employ incremental learning [227] and federated learning [230] [231] with edge systems, but the research in this context is still in its infancy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [227]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [230]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [231]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attention has been successfully applied in computer vision and natural language processing.

    “Attention has shown its successful application in CV [174] and NLP [180].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [174] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [180]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    On edge systems, system dynamics such as memory contention, cache miss, and bandwidth unavailability also affect DNN application execution.

    “However, on edge systems, some system dynamics, memory contention, cache miss, bandwidth unavailability, etc, also impact the execution of DNN application”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Data privacy is one motivation of edge systems, so collecting and sharing data across edge systems may be impossible.

    “data privacy is one motivation of edge systems, so it may be impossible to collect data from different edge systems and share them with each other.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At present, edge intelligence systems are used mainly for computer vision tasks.

    “currently computer vision models are the major application for edge intelligence systems”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Real-world edge deployments face rapidly changing conditions.

    “Edge systems installed in real world operate in highly dynamic environment”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Manual design of lightweight DNN models depends heavily on expert knowledge and requires lengthy hyperparameter exploration.

    “The manual design of lightweight DNN models is considerably dependent on experts' knowledge and also needs a time-consuming hyperparameter exploration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Different layers have different functions.

    “different layers have different functions”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reductions in FLOPs and compression ratio do not directly translate into performance improvement.

    “the reduced FLOPs and compression ratio cannot directly translate to the performance improvement.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Different hardware architectures demonstrate different degrees of parallelism.

    “different hardware architectures demonstrate different degrees of parallelism”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The design space for DNN is too large for exhaustive search.

    “In addition, design space for DNN is too large to have an exhaustive search.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of measurement of trade-offs between metrics, leading to high search cost or sub-optimal design.

    “However, we still lack the measurement of the trade-off between each metric and this will lead to either high searching cost or sub-optimal design result.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Different hardware accelerators have diverse underlying characteristics, and most DNNs were designed without considering underlying hardware features.

    “However, different hardware accelerators features diverse underlying characteristics, and the majority of DNNs were designed without consideration of underlying hardware features.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The majority of works on deep learning for edge systems target computer vision tasks such as image classification and object detection.

    “Currently, the majority of works regarding deep learning on edge systems target computer vision tasks, i.e., image classification and object detection.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    On-device learning is challenging because training is more computation-intensive and memory-hungry than inference, while edge systems are resource-constrained.

    “Ondevice learning is a challenging task, because training is a more computation-intensive and memory-hungry procedure compared to inference, whereas edge systems are resourceconstrained in many settings.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Limited energy supply of some edge systems makes on-device learning even more difficult.

    “Moreover, limited energy supply of some edge systems will make this issue even more difficult.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The success of DNN models heavily relies on high-quality and large-scale datasets.

    “The success of DNN models heavily relies on high-quality and large-scale datasets, such as ImageNet”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For some edge applications, collecting and labeling massive data is difficult or expensive.

    “for some edge applications, e.g., edge surveillance systems in wild life, defect detection in manufacturing process, etc, it is difficult or expensive to collect massive amount of data and label them to train a good model.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    During long-term operation, edge systems are likely to collect data with different distributions or new classes, requiring model updates.

    “during the long-term operation, edge systems are likely to collect data with different distributions from the original training data or data pertaining to a new class which is not included in the original training data, we may need to update the model on edge systems”
15 of 15

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning frameworks such as TensorFlow Lite and PyTorch are used to develop and run machine learning models on edge devices.

    “Machine learning frameworks: ML frameworks, such as TensorFlow Lite and PyTorch, are used to develop and run machine learning models on edge devices [202].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [202]

    The Quantization section (page unavailable) names TensorFlow Lite among tools supporting efficient execution of quantized models for resource-constrained edge systems. It also identifies PyTorch as a framework supporting post-training quantization, but does not say PyTorch is used to develop or run models on edge devices. The cited passages therefore support the edge-use claim for TensorFlow Lite, but not its full application to both examples. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • NAS search-cost column conflicts with its stated unit

    Minor

    The table introduction specifies GPU hours, but the column heading labels the same costs as GPU days.

  • Figure 11 has two different architecture counts

    Minor

    The discussion says Figure 11 measures 100000 architectures, while its caption says 10000.

  • BinaryConnect year differs from its reference

    Minor

    Table V gives 2016 for BinaryConnect [111], while the corresponding reference gives 2015.

  • BranchyNet year differs from its reference

    Minor

    Table VIII dates BranchyNet to 2017, but the cited conference entry is dated 2016.

  • Li et al. pruning scope differs between table and prose

    Minor

    Table IV classifies Li et al. [87] as layer pruning, whereas the accompanying discussion calls it global pruning.

5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

67 of the 278 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G.E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, in: P.L. Bartlett, F.C.N. Pereira, C.J.C. Burges, L. Bottou, K.Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25: 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2012. Proceedings of a meeting held December 3-6, 2012, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States, 2012, pp. 1106–1114. URL:https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2012/hash/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Abstract.html
  2. Goodfellow, 2016, vol. 1
  3. Ieee computer society’s top 12 technology trends for 2020, URL: https://www.computer.org/press-room/2019-news/ieee-computer-societys-top-12-technology-trends-for-2020, access: 2020-5-14.
  4. Wei, 2021, Wireless edge caching based on content similarity in dynamic environments, Journal of Systems Architecture, 102000
  5. Choudhary, 2020, A comprehensive survey on model compression and acceleration, Artificial Intelligence Review, 1
  6. Y. Guo, H. Wang, Q. Hu, H. Liu, L. Liu, M. Bennamoun, Deep learning for 3d point clouds: A survey, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
  7. M. Feurer, A. Klein, K. Eggensperger, J.T. Springenberg, M. Blum, F. Hutter, Efficient and robust automated machine learning, in: C. Cortes, N.D. Lawrence, D.D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7–12, 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2015, pp. 2962–2970. URL:https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2015/hash/11d0e6287202fced83f79975ec59a3a6-Abstract.html.
  8. J. Wang, T.A. Bohn, C.X. Ling, Pelee: A real-time object detection system on mobile devices, in: S. Bengio, H.M. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018, December 3–8, 2018, Montréal, Canada, 2018, pp. 1967–1976. URL:https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/9908279ebbf1f9b250ba689db6a0222b-Abstract.html.
  9. S. Ren, K. He, R.B. Girshick, J. Sun, Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks, in: C. Cortes, N.D. Lawrence, D.D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7–12, 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2015, pp. 91–99. URL:https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2015/hash/14bfa6bb14875e45bba028a21ed38046-Abstract.html.
  10. M. Denil, B. Shakibi, L. Dinh, M. Ranzato, N. de Freitas, Predicting parameters in deep learning, in: C.J.C. Burges, L. Bottou, Z. Ghahramani, K.Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013. Proceedings of a meeting held December 5–8, 2013, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States, 2013, pp. 2148–2156. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2013/hash/7fec306d1e665bc9c748b5d2b99a6e97-Abstract.html.
  11. Y. LeCun, J.S. Denker, S.A. Solla, Optimal brain damage, in: Advances in neural information processing systems, 1990, pp. 598–605.
  12. S. Han, J. Pool, J. Tran, W.J. Dally, Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network, in: C. Cortes, N.D. Lawrence, D.D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7–12, 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2015, pp. 1135–1143. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2015/hash/ae0eb3eed39d2bcef4622b2499a05fe6-Abstract.html.
  13. S. Han, H. Mao, W.J. Dally, Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding, International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  14. D. Molchanov, A. Ashukha, D.P. Vetrov, Variational dropout sparsifies deep neural networks, in: D. Precup, Y.W. Teh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6–11 August 2017, Vol. 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2017, pp. 2498–2507. URL: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/molchanov17a.html.
  15. Deb, 2001, vol. 16
  16. H. Li, A. Kadav, I. Durdanovic, H. Samet, H.P. Graf, Pruning filters for efficient convnets, in: 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24–26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings, OpenReview.net, 2017. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJqFGTslg.
  17. W. Wen, C. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, H. Li, Learning structured sparsity in deep neural networks, in: D.D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. von Luxburg, I. Guyon, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, December 5–10, 2016, Barcelona, Spain, 2016, pp. 2074–2082. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2016/hash/41bfd20a38bb1b0bec75acf0845530a7-Abstract.html.
  18. M. Courbariaux, Y. Bengio, J. David, Binaryconnect: Training deep neural networks with binary weights during propagations, in: C. Cortes, N.D. Lawrence, D.D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7–12, 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2015, pp. 3123–3131. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2015/hash/3e15cc11f979ed25912dff5b0669f2cd-Abstract.html.
  19. A. Tarvainen, H. Valpola, Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results, in: I. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H.M. Wallach, R. Fergus, S.V.N. Vishwanathan, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4–9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 1195–1204. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/68053af2923e00204c3ca7c6a3150cf7-Abstract.html.
  20. H. Cai, C. Gan, T. Wang, Z. Zhang, S. Han, Once-for-all: Train one network and specialize it for efficient deployment, in: 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26–30, 2020, OpenReview.net, 2020. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=HylxE1HKwS.
  21. C. Li, Z. Yu, Y. Fu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhao, H. You, Q. Yu, Y. Wang, C. Hao, Y. Lin, HW-nas-bench: Hardware-aware neural architecture search benchmark, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=_0kaDkv3dVf.
  22. J. Lin, Y. Rao, J. Lu, J. Zhou, Runtime neural pruning, in: I. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H.M. Wallach, R. Fergus, S.V.N. Vishwanathan, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4–9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 2181–2191. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/a51fb975227d6640e4fe47854476d133-Abstract.html.
  23. B.E. Bejnordi, T. Blankevoort, M. Welling, Batch-shaping for learning conditional channel gated networks, in: 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26–30, 2020, OpenReview.net, 2020. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=Bke89JBtvB.
  24. T. Bolukbasi, J. Wang, O. Dekel, V. Saligrama, Adaptive neural networks for efficient inference, in: D. Precup, Y.W. Teh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6–11 August 2017, Vol. 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2017, pp. 527–536. URL: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/bolukbasi17a.html.
  25. K. Xu, J. Ba, R. Kiros, K. Cho, A.C. Courville, R. Salakhutdinov, R.S. Zemel, Y. Bengio, Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention, in: F.R. Bach, D.M. Blei (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2015, Lille, France, 6–11 July 2015, Vol. 37 of JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, JMLR.org, 2015, pp. 2048–2057. URL: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/xuc15.html.
  26. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A.N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, in: I. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H.M. Wallach, R. Fergus, S.V.N. Vishwanathan, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4–9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 5998–6008. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html.
  27. A. Veit, M.J. Wilber, S.J. Belongie, Residual networks behave like ensembles of relatively shallow networks, in: D.D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. von Luxburg, I. Guyon, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, December 5–10, 2016, Barcelona, Spain, 2016, pp. 550–558. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2016/hash/37bc2f75bf1bcfe8450a1a41c200364c-Abstract.html.
  28. T. Chen, T. Moreau, Z. Jiang, L. Zheng, E. Yan, H. Shen, M. Cowan, L. Wang, Y. Hu, L. Ceze, et al., {TVM}) An automated end-to-end optimizing compiler for deep learning, in: 13th {USENIX})Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation ({OSDI})18), 2018, pp. 578–594.
  29. Z. Liu, H. Tang, Y. Lin, S. Han, Point-voxel CNN for efficient 3d deep learning, in: H.M. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d’Alché-Buc, E.B. Fox, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8–14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2019, pp. 963–973. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/5737034557ef5b8c02c0e46513b98f90-Abstract.html.
  30. I.J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A.C. Courville, Y. Bengio, Generative adversarial nets, in: Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N.D. Lawrence, K.Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2014, December 8–13 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2014, pp. 2672–2680. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2014/hash/5ca3e9b122f61f8f06494c97b1afccf3-Abstract.html.
  31. Y. Wang, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, P. Xu, Y. Zhao, Y. Lin, Z. Wang, E2-train: Training state-of-the-art cnns with over 80% energy savings, in: H.M. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d’Alché-Buc, E.B. Fox, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8–14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2019, pp. 5139–5151. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/663772ea088360f95bac3dc7ffb841be-Abstract.html.
  32. Pan, 2009, A survey on transfer learning, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22, 1345, 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Dosovitskiy, 2021, An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale, International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)
  34. Luo, 2021, HSCoNAS: Hardware-Software Co-Design of Efficient DNNs via Neural Architecture Search, Design, Automation \& Test in Europe Conference \& Exhibition (DATE)
  35. Luo, 2021, Designing Efficient DNNs via Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search and Beyond, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (TCAD)
  36. Kong, 2022, HACScale: Hardware-Aware Compound Scaling for Resource-Efficient DNNs, Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)
  37. Huai, 2021, ZeroBN: Learning Compact Neural Networks For Latency-Critical Edge Systems, ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, D., Kong, H., Luo, X., Liu, W., & Subramaniam, R.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Hewlett-Packard (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Luo, Xiangzhong
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
485
Pages
297-320
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110617657
Cited by
171
References
278
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 8
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Nanyang Technological University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
edge AI, edge computing, deep learning, lightweight models, model compression, neural architecture search, hardware-aware neural architecture search, adaptive deep learning, edge devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review