Cited by 112Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

RTSeg: Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Comparative Study

Open access
Siam, Mennatullah, Gamal, Mostafa, Abdel-Razek, Moemen, Yogamani, Senthil, Jagersand, Martin·2018·2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

Abstract

Semantic segmentation benefits robotics related applications, especially autonomous driving. Most of the research on semantic segmentation only focuses on increasing the accuracy of segmentation models with little attention to computationally efficient solutions. The few work conducted in this direction does not provide principled methods to evaluate the different design choices for segmentation. In this paper, we address this gap by presenting a real-time semantic segmentation benchmarking framework with a decoupled design for feature extraction and decoding methods. The framework is comprised of different network architectures for feature extraction such as VGG16, Resnet18, MobileNet, and ShuffleNet. It is also comprised of multiple meta-architectures for segmentation that define the decoding methodology. These include SkipNet, UNet, and Dilation Frontend. Experimental results are presented on the Cityscapes dataset for urban scenes. The modular design allows novel architectures to emerge, that lead to 143x GFLOPs reduction in comparison to SegNet. This benchmarking framework is publicly available at11https://github.com/MSiam/TFSegmentation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icip.2018.8451495

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bojarski et al. demonstrated end-to-end learning for steering [2] and recently it was applied to fisheye cameras [54].

    “Bojarski et al. demonstrated end-to-end learning [2] for steering and recently it was applied to fisheye cameras [54].”

    From WoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2019) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Abstract and Introduction discuss semantic segmentation, but neither addresses end-to-end steering with fisheye cameras. Searches for fisheye steering and Bojarski found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siam, M., Gamal, M., Abdel-Razek, M., Yogamani, S., & Jagersand, M.
Affiliations
Cairo University (EG)
Venue
2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-10
Pages
1603-1607
ISSN
1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790381683
Cited by
112
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 6
FWCI
5.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • TIB Data Manager
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
real-time semantic segmentation, benchmarking framework, computational efficiency, feature extraction, decoding algorithms, meta-architecture, cityscape, autonomous driving, robotics, modular network design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review