Cited by 43Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Imipramine and citalopram facilitate amyloid precursor protein secretion in vitro

PAKASKI, M, BJELIK, A, HUGYECZ, M, KASA, P, JANKA, Z, KALMAN, J·2005·Neurochemistry International

Abstract

Comorbid depression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common mood disorder in the elderly and a broad spectrum of antidepressants have been used for its treatment. Abeta peptides and other derivatives of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) have been implicated as central to the pathogenesis of AD. However, the functional relationship of APP and its proteolytic derivatives to antidepressant therapy is not known. In this study, Western blotting was used to test the ability of the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) imipramine or the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram to change the release of APP and the protein kinase C (PKC) content. Both antidepressants increased APP secretion in primary rat neuronal cultures. Imipramine or citalopram enhanced the level of secreted APP by 3.2- or 3.4-fold, respectively. Increases in PKC level were observed only after imipramine treatment. These in vitro data suggest that both TCA and SSRI are able to interfere with the APP metabolism. Imipramine promotes the non-amyloidogenic route of APP processing via stimulatory effects on PKC. We propose that PKC is not involved in the mechanism underlying the effects of citalopram on the APP metabolism. Since the secreted APP is not further available for the pathological cleavage of beta- and gamma-secretases, antidepressant medication might be beneficial in AD therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.03.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PAKASKI, M., BJELIK, A., HUGYECZ, M., KASA, P., JANKA, Z., & KALMAN, J.
Affiliations
University of Szeged (HU)
Venue
Neurochemistry International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
190-195
ISSN
0197-0186 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078055819
Cited by
43
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurochemistry International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
imipramine, citalopram, amyloid precursor protein, APP secretion, protein kinase C, Alzheimer's disease, comorbid depression, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, APP processing, amyloid-beta, neuronal culture
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Cells, Cultured, Depressive Disorder, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Imipramine, Neurons, Protein Kinase C, Citalopram, Up-Regulation, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Culture Media, Conditioned, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Basal Nucleus of Meynert, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review