Cited by 15Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Antibody binding to cell surface amyloid precursor protein induces neuronal injury by deregulating the phosphorylation of focal adhesion signaling related proteins

Xu, Yu-Xia, Wang, Hong-Quan, Yan, Jie, Sun, Xiao-Bo, Guo, Jing-Chun, Zhu, Cui-Qing·2009·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The biological function of full-length amyloid-beta protein precursor (APP), the precursor of Abeta, is not fully understood. Mounting studies reported that antibody binding to cell surface APP causes neuronal injury. However, the mechanism of cell surface APP mediating neuronal injury remains to be determined. Colocalization of APP with integrin on cell surface leads us to suppose that focal adhesion (FA) related mechanism is involved in surface APP-mediated neuronal injury. In the present study, results demonstrated that primary cultured neurons treated with antibody against APP-N-terminal not only caused neuronal injury and aberrant morphologic changes of neurite, but also induced reaction of FA proteins appearing an acute increase then decrease pattern. Moreover, the elevation of tyrosine phosphorylation of FA proteins including paxillin and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and down-regulated expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP1B) induced by APP antibody were prevented by inhibitor of Src protein kinases 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7(t-butyl) pyrazol (3,4-D) pyramide (PP2) and G protein inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX), implying that Src family kinase and G protein play roles in APP-induced FA signals. In addition, pretreatment with PTX and PP2 was able to suppress APP-antibody induced neuronal injury. Taken together, the results suggest a novel mechanism for APP mediating neuronal injury through deregulating FA signals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.09.022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y.-X., Wang, H.-Q., Yan, J., Sun, X.-B., Guo, J.-C., & Zhu, C.-Q.
Affiliations
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
465
Issue
3
Pages
276-281
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143515955
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
amyloid precursor protein, neuronal injury, focal adhesion signaling, tyrosine phosphorylation, paxillin, focal adhesion kinase, PTP1B, Src family kinases, G proteins, integrins, neurite morphology
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Cells, Cultured, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Apoptosis, Rats, Focal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review