Cited by 31Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Serum apolipoprotein E is associated with long-term risk of Alzheimer’s disease: The Rotterdam Study

Wolters, Frank J., Koudstaal, Peter J., Hofman, Albert, Duijn, Cornelia M.van, Ikram, M.Arfan·2016·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Background Serum levels of apolipoprotein E (apoE) have been suggested as potential biomarker for dementia, but the long-term association between apoE and risk of dementia is uncertain. Methods Between 1990 and 1993, we measured serum apoE by immunoassay in 1042 non-demented individuals (mean ± SD age 68.4 ± 7.3 years; 59.3% women) from the population-based Rotterdam Study. Follow-up for dementia was complete until 2014. We used Cox models to determine the risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in relation to apoE, adjusting for age, sex, educational level, cardiovascular risk factors, and additionally APOE genotype. Results Serum apoE was associated to APOE genotype (p-trend=1.0E-51, r(2)=0.21). In men, apoE tended to be lower with age, whereas in women the opposite was observed (p-trend=0.07 and 0.08, respectively). During a median follow-up of 15.7 years (IQR 9.7-21.7), 220 participants developed dementia, of whom 180 had Alzheimer's disease. Lower serum apoE was associated with an increased risk of dementia (HR, 95%CI, per SD decrease: 1.25, 1.05-1.48) and in particular Alzheimer's disease (1.51, 1.23-1.86), which remained statistically significant for Alzheimer's disease after additionally adjusting for APOE genotype (1.28, 1.01-1.62). When stratifying analyses in 5-year time frames, risk estimates were similar throughout the study period. Serum apoE tended to marginally improve 20-year prediction of Alzheimer's disease (IDI 0.008, 95%CI -0.001-0.026, p=0.086), but not…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.018

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolters, F. J., Koudstaal, P. J., Hofman, A., Duijn, C. M. V., & Ikram, M. A.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Ikram, M.Arfan
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
617
Pages
139-142
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2268949499
Cited by
31
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Erasmus Medical Centre and Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO
  • Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
  • Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly
  • Netherlands Genomics Initiative
  • Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  • Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, the European Commission (DG XII
  • Municipality of Rotterdam
  • Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative (CVON2012-06)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, Alzheimer's disease, dementia risk, APOE genotype, biomarkers, risk prediction, sex differences, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review