Cited by 124Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchIon channel regulation and function

Electrophysiological classes of neocortical neurons.

Contreras, Diego·2004·Neural Networks

Abstract

Neocortical network behavior and neocortical function emerge from synaptic interactions among neurons with specific electrophysiological and morphological characteristics. The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of neurons define their firing patterns and their input-output functions with critical consequences for their functional properties within the network. Understanding the role played by the active non-linear properties caused by ionic conductances distributed in the soma and the dendrites is a critical step towards understanding cortical function. Here I present a brief description of electrophysiological and morphological characteristics of neocortical cells that allow their classification in categories. I review some examples of differences in functional properties among different electrophysiological cell classes in the visual cortex, as well as the role played by specific ionic conductances in defining firing and accommodation properties of neocortical neurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.04.003

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To achieve a safe, reliable, high-performance B/CI system, a critical mission requirement is the initial establishment of intimate and stable connections to monitor the electrical firing patterns and waveforms of the ∼86 × 10^9 neurons and the ∼2 × 10^14 synapses of the human brain at a suitable repetition rate (400-800 Hz is the reported average maximum range).

    “To achieve a safe, reliable, high-performance B/CI system, a critical mission requirement is the initial establishment of intimate and stable connections to monitor the electrical firing patterns and waveforms of the ∼86 × 109 neurons and the ∼2 × 1014 synapses of the human brain at a suitable repetition rate (400–800 Hz is the reported average maximum range) (Wilson, 1999; Contreras, 2004).”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Contreras, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Contreras, D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Contreras, Diego
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
17
Issue
5-6
Pages
633-646
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972042913
Cited by
124
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01-013984)
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
neocortical neurons, neuronal firing patterns, ionic conductance, accommodation, visual cortex, neuronal morphology, input-output function
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Conductivity, Electrophysiology, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Potassium Channels, Neocortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review