The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: Behavior and physiology
Abstract
Roitman and Shadlen [Roitman J. D., & Shadlen M. N. (2002). Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9475-9489] have published a non-human primate study on visual decision making. They collected both behavioral and neurophysiological data and provided evidence that the data are qualitatively consistent with a mechanism based on accumulating sensory evidence up to a decision threshold. I have previously demonstrated that a time-variant diffusion model can account quite well quantitatively for both the behavioral and the neural data. In this manuscript I discuss how well the data constrains different components and parameters of the computational process. I also discuss the biological plausibility of the model parameters. I will demonstrate that a relatively large class of models, both with and without temporal integration and both stationary and time-variant could account for the behavioral data. Both the single cell recordings from the parietal cortex and previously published data from the extrastriate visual cortex provide additional constraints. Overall, the data favor a diffusion model with time-variant gain and leaky integrators. The integration time constant, however, turns out not to be well-constrained by the data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The model with urgency explains the longer RTs on error trials 36 (Supplementary Fig. 7).”
From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Because chance represents 50% correct, there is less impetus to complete the trial at weak motion strengths, which probably explains the weaker urgency signal, u(t), seen previously in 2-choice experiments2,36.”
From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“According to the model, the longer RT on errors arises as a consequence of the urgency signal, u(t), which effectively imposes a more lax criterion for terminating the decision (as if the bound were dropping as a function of time), thereby rendering errors more frequent36.”
From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550 · Cited by 2,152
Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432 · Cited by 1,925
Neural Basis of a Perceptual Decision in the Parietal Cortex (Area LIP) of the Rhesus Monkey
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1916 · Cited by 1,755
Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067 · Cited by 1,478
A Comparison of Sequential Sampling Models for Two-Choice Reaction Time.
Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.2.333 · Cited by 1,288
Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits
Wang, X.-J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01092-9 · Cited by 1,242
Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance
Zohary, E., Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370140a0 · Cited by 1,237
Attentional modulation of visual processing
Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039 · Cited by 1,158
A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT
Britten, K. H., Newsome, W. T., Shadlen, M. N., Celebrini, S., & Movshon, J. A. (1996) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s095252380000715x · Cited by 1,049
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 232
Stochastic Choice and Optimal Sequential SamplingPreprint
Fudenberg, D., Strack, P., & Strzalecki, T. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2602927 · Cited by 34
The Effects of Evidence Bounds on Decision-Making: Theoretical and Empirical Developments
Zhang, J. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00263 · Cited by 33
Temporal integration is a robust feature of perceptual decisions
Hyafil, A., de la Rocha, J., Pericas, C., Katz, L. N., Huk, A. C., & Pillow, J. W. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.84045 · Cited by 33
Prediction of Decisions from Noise in the Brain before the Evidence is Provided
Rolls, E. T., & Deco, G. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00033 · Cited by 30
A rational model of people's inferences about others' preferences based on response times
Gates, V., Callaway, F., Ho, M. K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104885 · Cited by 28
Ghaderi-Kangavari, A., Rad, J. A., & Nunez, M. D. (2023) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-023-00167-4 · Cited by 39
Testing Optimal Timing in Value-Linked Decision Making
Bhui, R. (2019) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-019-0025-9 · Cited by 28
Food decision-making under time pressure
Huseynov, S., & Palma, M. A. (2020) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104072 · Cited by 27
Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions
Merfeld, D. M., Clark, T. K., Lu, Y. M., & Karmali, F. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00225.2015 · Cited by 27
Explicit melioration by a neural diffusion model
Simen, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.017 · Cited by 27
Dendauw, E., Evans, N. J., Logan, G. D., Haffen, É., Bennabi, D., Gajdos, T., & Servant, M. (2024) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000464 · Cited by 31
How Prior Probability Influences Decision Making: A Unifying Probabilistic Model
Huang, Y., Hanks, T. D., Shadlen, M. N., Friesen, A. L., & Rao, R. P. N. (2012) · Cited by 25
Categorical evidence, confidence, and urgency during probabilistic categorization
Braunlich, K., & Seger, C. A. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.011 · Cited by 24
Maia, P. D., & Kutz, J. N. (2017) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-017-0643-y · Cited by 24
Dynamic combination of sensory and reward information under time pressure
Farashahi, S. G., Ting, C.-C., Kao, C.-H., Wu, S., & Soltani, A. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006070 · Cited by 22
Trading Speed and Accuracy by Coding Time: A Coupled-circuit Cortical Model
Standage, D., You, H., Wang, D., & Dorris, M. C. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003021 · Cited by 21
Zhou, X., Wong‐Lin, K., & Holmes, P. J. (2009) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2009.07-08-817 · Cited by 23
Temporal integration of sensory evidence for saccade target selection
Ludwig, C. J. H. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.012 · Cited by 23
Colas, J. T. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186822 · Cited by 21
Inhibition in Superior Colliculus Neurons in a Brightness Discrimination Task?
Ratcliff, R., Hasegawa, Y. T., Hasegawa, R. P., Childers, R., Smith, P. L., & Segraves, M. A. (2011) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00135 · Cited by 21
Richter, T., Ulrich, R., & Janczyk, M. (2023) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102756 · Cited by 21
Optimal decision-making theories
Bogacz, R. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374620-7.00018-2 · Cited by 21
Decision prioritization and causal reasoning in decision hierarchies
Zylberberg, A. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009688 · Cited by 20
Neural population dynamics underlying evidence accumulation in multiple rat brain regions
DePasquale, B., Brody, C. D., & Pillow, J. W. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.84955 · Cited by 22
Confluence of Timing and Reward Biases in Perceptual Decision-Making Dynamics
Shinn, M., Ehrlich, D. B., Lee, D., Murray, J. D., & Seo, H. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0544-20.2020 · Cited by 19
Boehm, U., Cox, S., Gantner, G., & Stevenson, R. P. (2021) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102613 · Cited by 19
Correlates of Perceptual Learning in an Oculomotor Decision Variable
Connolly, P. M., Bennur, S., & Gold, J. I. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3962-08.2009 · Cited by 19
On mimicry among sequential sampling models
Khodadadi, A., & Townsend, J. T. (2015) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2015.08.007 · Cited by 22
Is saccade averaging determined by visual processing or movement planning?
Bhutani, N., Ray, S., & Murthy, A. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00344.2012 · Cited by 17
Smith, P. L. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02237-3 · Cited by 19
Neurocognitive Modeling of Perceptual Decision Making
Palmeri, T. J., Schall, J. D., & Logan, G. D. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199957996.013.15 · Cited by 17
A probabilistic, distributed, recursive mechanism for decision-making in the brain
Caballero, J. A., Humphries, M. D., & GURNEY, K. N. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006033 · Cited by 16
Evans, N. J., Tillman, G., & Wagenmakers, E. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000192 · Cited by 20
Linear Integration of Sensory Evidence over Space and Time Underlies Face Categorization
Okazawa, G., Sha, L., & Kiani, R. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3055-20.2021 · Cited by 16
Motion discrimination under uncertainty and ambiguity
Kalisvaart, J. P., Klaver, I., & Goossens, J. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.1.20 · Cited by 17
Learning to allocate limited time to decisions with different expected outcomes
Khodadadi, A., Fakhari, P., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2017) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.03.002 · Cited by 18
Closed-Form Approximations of First-Passage Distributions for a Stochastic Decision-Making Model
Broderick, T., Wong‐Lin, K., & Holmes, P. J. (2010) · Applied Mathematics Research eXpress · doi:10.1093/amrx/abp008 · Cited by 16
Discrimination of Regular and Irregular Rhythms Explained by a Time Difference Accumulation Model
Espinoza-Monroy, M., & de Lafuente, V. (2021) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.01.035 · Cited by 12
An Optimizing Neuroeconomic Model of Discrete Choice
Woodford, M. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w19897 · Cited by 16
Computational analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff
Penconek, M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26120-2 · Cited by 14
Optimal metacognitive control of memory recall.
Callaway, F., Griffiths, T. L., Norman, K. A., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000441 · Cited by 23
Estimating the growth of internal evidence guiding perceptual decisions
Ludwig, C. J. H., & Davies, J. R. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.002 · Cited by 14
Coallier, É., & Kalaska, J. F. (2014) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00145.2014 · Cited by 15
Response time modelling reveals evidence for multiple, distinct sources of moral decision caution
Andrejević, M., White, J. P., Feuerriegel, D., Laham, S. M., & Bode, S. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105026 · Cited by 16
Reaction time in ankle movements: a diffusion model analysis
Michmizos, K. P., & Krebs, H. I. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4032-8 · Cited by 15
The Influence of Spatiotemporal Structure of Noisy Stimuli in Decision Making
Insabato, A., Dempere‐Marco, L., Pannunzi, M., Deco, G., & Romo, R. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003492 · Cited by 15
Environmental uncertainty and the advantage of impulsive choice strategies
Burk, D. C., & Averbeck, B. B. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010873 · Cited by 16
Temporal Integration of Auditory Information Is Invariant to Temporal Grouping Cues
Liu, A., Tsunada, J., Gold, J. I., & Cohen, Y. E. (2015) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0077-14.2015 · Cited by 13
ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
Chandrasekaran, C., & Hawkins, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108432 · Cited by 15
Miletić, S., Keuken, M. C., Mulder, M., Trampel, R., de Hollander, G., & Forstmann, B. U. (2022) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.06.014 · Cited by 13
Robust parallel decision-making in neural circuits with nonlinear inhibition
Kriener, B., Chaudhuri, R., & Fiete, I. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1917551117 · Cited by 13
Diffusion theory of the antipodal “shadow” mode in continuous-outcome, coherent-motion decisions.
Smith, P. L., Corbett, E. A., & Lilburn, S. D. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000377 · Cited by 13
Different Forms of Variability Could Explain a Difference Between Human and Rat Decision Making
Nguyen, Q. N., & Reinagel, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.794681 · Cited by 16
Lu, J., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.02983 · Cited by 10
Consistent Implementation of Decisions in the Brain
Marshall, J. A. R., Bogacz, R., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043443 · Cited by 11
Summerfield, C., & Blangero, A. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805308-9.00012-9 · Cited by 17
Rasanan, A. H. H., Evans, N. J., Rieskamp, J., & Rad, J. A. (2023) · Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements · doi:10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.03.005 · Cited by 12
Eye dominance alternations in binocular rivalry do not require visual awareness
Platonov, A., & Goossens, J. (2014) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/14.11.2 · Cited by 9
Leimbach, F., Georgiev, D., Vladimir Litvak, A., Antoniades, C. A., Limousin, P. D., Jahanshahi, M., & Bogacz, R. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01252 · Cited by 8
A theoretical analysis of the reward rate optimality of collapsing decision criteria
Boehm, U., van Maanen, L., Evans, N. J., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01806-4 · Cited by 10
Further perceptions of probability: In defence of associative models.
Forsgren, M., Juslin, P., & van den Berg, R. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000410 · Cited by 8
Response Time Distributions and the Accumulation of Visual Evidence in Freely Moving Mice
Treviño, M., y León, R. M., & Lezama, E. (2022) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.08.015 · Cited by 7
Optimal policy for uncertainty estimation concurrent with decision making
Li, X., Su, R., Chen, Y., & Yang, T. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112232 · Cited by 6
Deakin, J., Schofield, A. J., & Heinke, D. G. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26080642 · Cited by 6
Clarifying the nature of stochastic fluctuations and accumulation processes in spontaneous movements
Bogler, C., Grujičić, B., & Haynes, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271180 · Cited by 8
A parameter recovery assessment of a wide class of evidence accumulation models of decision-makingPreprint
Murrow, M., & Holmes, W. R. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4722049/v1 · Cited by 8
Grounding computational cognitive models.
Ludwig, C. J. H., Stuchlý, E., & Malhotra, G. (2025) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000533 · Cited by 5
Neural dynamics encoding risky choices during deliberation reveal separate choice subspaces
Peters, L. M., Roadarmel, A., Overton, J. A., Stickle, M. P., Lin, J. J., Kong, Z., Sáez, I., & Moxon, K. A. (2025) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102776 · Cited by 5
Mental kinematics: dynamics and mechanics of neurocognitive systems
Barack, D. L. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02766-1 · Cited by 5
A note on decomposition of sources of variability in perceptual decision-making
Kang, I., Ratcliff, R., & Voskuilen, C. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102431 · Cited by 5
Latimer, K. W., Huk, A. C., & Pillow, J. W. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/160994 · Cited by 7
Overcoming indecision by changing the decision boundaryPreprint
Malhotra, G., Leslie, D., Ludwig, C. J. H., & Bogacz, R. (2017) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2rdrw · Cited by 5
A cross-species framework for investigating perceptual evidence accumulationPreprint
Chakravarty, S., Delgado-Sallent, C., Kane, G. A., Xia, H., Do, Q. H., Senne, R. A., & Scott, B. B. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.17.589945 · Cited by 5
Of Rodents and Primates: Time-Variant Gain in Drift–Diffusion Decision Models
Asadpour, A., Tan, H. R., Lenfesty, B., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2024) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-023-00194-1 · Cited by 8
Tardiff, N., Suriya-Arunroj, L., Cohen, Y. E., & Gold, J. I. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010601 · Cited by 7
The Influence of Past Decision Information on Decision Making in the Present
Olianezhad, F., Zabbah, S., & Ebrahimpour, R. (2016) · The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam · doi:10.18869/acadpub.shefa.4.3.1 · Cited by 4
Tillman, G. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xuwbk · Cited by 4
Control Limited Perceptual Decision MakingPreprint
de Saa, J. R. C., & Renart, A. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.24.497481 · Cited by 5
Ghaderi-Kangavari, A., Rad, J. A., & Nunez, M. D. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pqv2c · Cited by 4
A cross-species framework for investigating perceptual evidence accumulationPreprint
Chakravarty, S., Delgado-Sallent, C., Kane, G. A., Xia, H., Do, Q. H., Senne, R. A., & Scott, B. B. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105116 · Cited by 4
Gautheron, F., Quinton, J., & Smeding, A. (2024) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-024-01178-0 · Cited by 7
Second Guessing in Perceptual Decision-Making
McLean, C. S., Ouyang, B., & Ditterich, J. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2787-19.2020 · Cited by 3
Self-citationMicropools of reliable area MT neurons explain rapid motion detection
Krause, B. M., & Ghose, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00845.2017 · Cited by 3
Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000212 · Cited by 3
Accumulation of Evidence in Decision Making
Huk, A. C., Katz, L. N., & Yates, J. L. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_309-2 · Cited by 3
Maia, P. D., & Kutz, J. N. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.05778 · Cited by 3
A neural substrate for Bayesian integration in human parietal cortexPreprint
Singletary, N. M., Gottlieb, J. P., & Horga, G. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.30.466508 · Cited by 3
Kopec, C. D., Luo, T. Z., Bondy, A., Gupta, D., Elliott, V. A., Charlton, J. A., Breda, J. R., Stagnaro, W. M., Reyes, E. J., Sirko, A. I., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.08.21.609064 · Cited by 2
A cross-species framework for investigating perceptual evidence accumulationPreprint
Chakravarty, S., Delgado-Sallent, C., Kane, G. A., Xia, H., Do, Q. H., Senne, R. A., & Scott, B. B. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105116.1 · Cited by 4
Bayesian inference for latent stepping and ramping models of spike train data
Latimer, K. W., Huk, A., & Pillow, J. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139941433.008 · Cited by 2
Perceptual Decisions in the Presence of Relevant and Irrelevant Sensory Evidence
Anders, U., McLean, C. S., Ouyang, B., & Ditterich, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00618 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCan the wrong horse win: The ability of race models to predict fast or slow errors
Townsend, J. T., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102360 · Cited by 4
Distinguishing Between Models of Perceptual Decision Making
Ditterich, J. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_13 · Cited by 2
Self-citationUnifying and generalizing models of neural dynamics during decision-makingPreprint
Zoltowski, D. M., Pillow, J. W., & Linderman, S. W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.04571 · Cited by 6
Forsgren, M., Juslin, P., & van den Berg, R. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.01.30.927558 · Cited by 2
Trial-history biases in evidence accumulation can give rise to apparent lapsesPreprint
Gupta, D., DePasquale, B., Kopec, C. D., & Brody, C. D. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.18.524599 · Cited by 2
An Introduction and Tutorial to Fitting (Time-Dependent) Diffusion Models with the R-Package dRiftDMPreprint
Koob, V., Richter, T., Ulrich, R., & Janczyk, M. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/3t2vf · Cited by 3
Asynchronous decision making in a memorized paddle pressing task
Dankert, J. R., Olson, B., & Si, J. (2008) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/001 · Cited by 1
Dynamics of a Recurrent Spiking Neural Network in the Two-Alternative Choice Task
Pugavko, M. M., Maslennikov, O. V., & Nekorkin, V. I. (2022) · Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11141-022-10175-2 · Cited by 1
Speeded response tasks with unpredictable deadlines
Blurton, S. P., Feifel, J., & Gondan, M. (2023) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102776 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ditterich, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ditterich, Jochen
- ORCID
- Ditterich, Jochen
- Venue
- Neural Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 981-1012
- ISSN
- 0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002824768
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- motion direction discrimination, visual decision making, diffusion models, decision threshold, sensory evidence accumulation, lateral intraparietal area, parietal cortex, extrastriate cortex, leaky integrator, computational neuroscience, single-unit recording
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Behavior, Behavior, Animal, Decision Making, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Neurological, Motion, Motion Perception, Neurons, Reaction Time, Stochastic Processes, Time Factors, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review