Cited by 620Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMotor Control and Adaptation

A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making

Mazurek, Mark E., Roitman, Jamie D., Ditterich, Jochen, Shadlen, Michael N.·2003·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Decisions based on uncertain information may benefit from an accumulation of information over time. We asked whether such an accumulation process may underlie decisions about the direction of motion in a random dot kinetogram. To address this question we developed a computational model of the decision process using ensembles of neurons whose spiking activity mimics neurons recorded in the extrastriate visual cortex (area MT or V5) and a sensorimotor association area of the parietal lobe (area LIP). The model instantiates the hypothesis that neurons in sensorimotor association areas compute the time integral of sensory signals from the visual cortex, construed as evidence for or against a proposition, and that the decision is made when the integrated evidence reaches a threshold. The model explains a variety of behavioral and physiological measurements obtained from monkeys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhg097

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The process involves a race between a mechanism that accumulates evidence for right, and against left, and a process that integrates evidence for left, and against right.

    “The process involves a race between a mechanism that accumulates evidence for right, and against left, and a process that integrates evidence for left, and against right (Usher and McClelland, 2001; Mazurek et al., 2003).”

    From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Mazurek et al., 2003

  • A formal model of bounded accumulation accounts quantitatively for subjects' speed and accuracy in 2-choice tasks.

    “First, a formal model of bounded accumulation accounts quantitatively for subjects’ speed and accuracy3,6.”

    From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [6]

  • A simple diffusion model provides a plausible account for the stimulation effects in both areas.

    “A simple diffusion model provides a plausible account for the stimulation effects in both areas (Fig. 5).”
  • Both the momentary evidence and the decision variable of the diffusion model can be related to neural responses.

    “Both the momentary evidence and the decision variable of this model can be related to neural responses18.”
  • A neural implementation of the diffusion model yields the opposite effect: shorter response times in error trials than in correct trials.

    “By contrast, a neural implementation of the diffusion model yields the opposite effect (Mazurek et al., 2003).”

    From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Mazurek et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazurek, M. E., Roitman, J. D., Ditterich, J., & Shadlen, M. N.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mazurek, Mark E.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
1257-1269
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2168648043
Cited by
620
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 50
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32gm007108-40)
  • National Eye Institute (EY11378, R01EY011378)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-07108)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00166, P51RR000166)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
perceptual decision making, neural integrator, random dot motion, direction discrimination, evidence accumulation, decision threshold, MT/V5, lateral intraparietal area, extrastriate cortex, parietal lobe
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Haplorhini, Decision Making, Discrimination, Psychological, Perception, Visual Cortex, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review