Cited by 34Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsEstrogen and related hormone effects

Can endocrine disruptors influence neuroplasticity in the aging brain?

Open access
Weiss, Bernard·2007·NeuroToxicology

Abstract

Only within the last two decades has the adult mammalian brain been recognized for its ability to generate new nerve cells and other neural structures and in essence to rewire itself. Although hippocampal structures have received the greatest scrutiny, other sites, including the cerebral cortex, also display this potential. Such processes remain active in the aging brain, although to a lesser degree. Two of the factors known to induce neurogenesis are environmental enrichment and physical activity. Gonadal hormones, however, also play crucial roles. Androgens and estrogens are both required for the preservation of cognitive function during aging and apparently help counteract the risk of Alzheimer's disease. One overlooked threat to hormonal adequacy that requires close examination is the abundance of environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals that interfere with gonadal function. They come in the form of estrogenic mimics, androgen mimics, anti-estrogens, anti-androgens, and in a variety of other guises. Because our brains are in continuous transition throughout the lifespan, responding both to environmental circumstances and to changing levels of gonadal steroids, endocrine-disrupting chemicals possess the potential to impair neurogenesis, and represent a hazard for the preservation of cognitive function during the later stages of the life cycle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.01.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, B.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Weiss, Bernard
Venue
NeuroToxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
938-950
ISSN
0161-813X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991751974
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroToxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES-01247, ES013247, R01ES013247, R21ES015509, P30ES001247)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, neuroplasticity, neurogenesis, brain aging, gonadal hormones, estrogen, androgens, cognitive function, Alzheimer's disease, environmental enrichment, physical activity, antiestrogens, androgen receptor antagonists, hippocampus, cerebral cortex
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Brain, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Endocrine Disruptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review