Cited by 174Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep modulates word-pair learning but not motor sequence learning in healthy older adults

Open access
Wilson, Jessica K., Baran, Bengi, Pace-Schott, Edward F., Ivry, Richard B., Spencer, Rebecca M.C.·2012·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Sleep benefits memory across a range of tasks for young adults. However, remarkably little is known of the role of sleep on memory for healthy older adults. We used 2 tasks, 1 assaying motor skill learning and the other assaying nonmotor/declarative learning, to examine off-line changes in performance in young (20-34 years), middle-aged (35-50 years), and older (51-70 years) adults without disordered sleep. During an initial session, conducted either in the morning or evening, participants learned a motor sequence and a list of word pairs. Memory tests were given twice, 12 and 24 hours after training, allowing us to analyze off-line consolidation after a break that included sleep or normal wake. Sleep-dependent performance changes were reduced in older adults on the motor sequence learning task. In contrast, sleep-dependent performance changes were similar for all 3 age groups on the word pair learning task. Age-related changes in sleep or networks activated during encoding or during sleep may contribute to age-related declines in motor sequence consolidation. Interestingly, these changes do not affect declarative memory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.029

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, J. K., Baran, B., Pace-Schott, E. F., Ivry, R. B., & Spencer, R. M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Rebecca M.C.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
991-1000
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129215099
Cited by
174
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (K99/R00AG029710, P01 NS040813)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep, memory consolidation, motor sequence learning, word pair learning, older adults, age-related memory decline, declarative memory, motor skill learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Mental Recall, Sleep, Verbal Learning, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review