Cited by 125Lysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Portuguese family with the co-occurrence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis phenotypes due to progranulin gene mutation

Almeida, Maria R., Macário, Maria C., Ramos, Lina, Baldeiras, Inês, Ribeiro, Maria H., Santana, Isabel·2016·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

We and others have reported heterozygous progranulin mutations as an important cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). It has been identified a complete progranulin deficiency because of a homozygous mutation in a sibling pair with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL). Here, we describe the first case of NCL caused by a homozygous progranulin mutation segregating in a family with neuropathological confirmed FTLD. In this FTLD-NCL family, we detail the clinical phenotype, neuropsychological evaluation and imaging data of our proband harboring a homozygous mutation, c.900_901dupGT, with serum progranulin level (<6 ng/mL). Symptoms included rapidly progressive visual deficit, slightly dysarthria, and cerebellar ataxia. The electroretinogram confirmed a severe attenuation of rod and cone responses compatible with retinal dystrophy diagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging showed severe global cerebellar atrophy. In contrast, heterozygous relatives presented behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and some also developed extrapyramidal features compatible with corticobasal syndrome. Our findings suggest the importance of assessing serum progranulin levels in suspected recessive adult-onset NCL cases. Overall, a more holistic neurologic intervention is needed to guarantee a proper genetic counseling in cases like the present family where two distinct phenotypes are generated according to the individuals' mutation state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Almeida, M. R., Macário, M. C., Ramos, L., Baldeiras, I., Ribeiro, M. H., & Santana, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Almeida, Maria R.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
41
Pages
200.e1-200.e5
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2288574569
Cited by
125
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
frontotemporal lobar degeneration, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, retinal dystrophy, cerebellar ataxia, corticobasal syndrome, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, genetic counseling, familial neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Progranulins, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Mutation, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Phenotype, Portugal, Biomarkers, Comorbidity, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Genetic Association Studies, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review