Cited by 30Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Fear acquisition and extinction deficits in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease

Nasrouei, Sarah, Rattel, Julina A., Liedlgruber, Michael, Marksteiner, Josef, Wilhelm, Frank H.·2020·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Impaired learning and memory functioning are prime markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although initial evidence points to impaired fear acquisition in later AD, no study has investigated fear conditioning in early stages and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), a condition often preceding AD. The present study examined if fear conditioning gradually decays from healthy elderly to patients with aMCI, to patients with AD. Patients with AD (n = 43), patients with aMCI (n = 43), and matched healthy controls (n = 40) underwent a classical fear conditioning paradigm. During acquisition, a neutral face (conditioned stimulus, CS+) was paired with an electrical stimulus, whereas another face (unconditioned stimulus, CS-) was unpaired. Conditioned responses were measured by unconditioned stimulus expectancy, valence, and skin conductance. Compared to healthy controls, both patient groups showed less differential (CS+ vs. CS-) fear acquisition across all measures. Patients further displayed slowed extinction indexed by higher unconditioned stimulus expectancy and reduced positive valence for CS+, declining from aMCI to AD. Groups did not differ in responses during a preconditioning habituation phase and in unconditioned responding. Diminished differential fear acquisition and slowed extinction could represent prognostic markers for AD onset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.11.003

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Context-associated memory deficit is typical in AD patients and manifested as dysfunction of fear conditioning involving neural circuits of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex.

    “Context-associated memory: This deficit is typical in AD patients [128][129][130] and manifested as dysfunction of fear conditioning 82 involving neural circuits of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex 131,132 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nasrouei, S., Rattel, J. A., Liedlgruber, M., Marksteiner, J., & Wilhelm, F. H.
Affiliations
University of Salzburg (AT)
Corresponding author
Nasrouei, Sarah
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
87
Pages
26-34
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985073552
Cited by
30
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
fear conditioning, fear extinction, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, early Alzheimer's disease, classical conditioning, positive valence, skin conductance, habituation, memory impairment, prognostic factors, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Electric Stimulation, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, HIV Antibodies, Mice, Cognitive Dysfunction, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review