Cited by 78Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

Multistable representation of speech forms: a functional MRI study of verbal transformations.

Sato, Marc, Baciu, Monica, Lœvenbruck, Hélène, Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Cathiard, Marie-Agnès, Segebarth, Christoph, Abry, Christian·2004·NeuroImage

Abstract

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to localize the brain areas involved in the imagery analogue of the verbal transformation effect, that is, the perceptual changes that occur when a speech form is cycled in rapid and continuous mental repetition. Two conditions were contrasted: a baseline condition involving the simple mental repetition of speech sequences, and a verbal transformation condition involving the mental repetition of the same items with an active search for verbal transformation. Our results reveal a predominantly left-lateralized network of cerebral regions activated by the verbal transformation task, similar to the neural network involved in verbal working memory: the left inferior frontal gyrus, the left supramarginal gyrus, the left superior temporal gyrus, the anterior part of the right cingulate cortex, and the cerebellar cortex, bilaterally. Our results strongly suggest that the imagery analogue of the verbal transformation effect, which requires percept analysis, form interpretation, and attentional maintenance of verbal material, relies on a working memory module sharing common components of speech perception and speech production systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.055

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, M., Baciu, M., Lœvenbruck, H., Schwartz, J.-L., Cathiard, M.-A., Segebarth, C., & Abry, C.
Affiliations
  • Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
  • Université Pierre Mendès France (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Sato, Marc
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
1143-1151
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154646990
Cited by
78
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
speech imagery, verbal working memory, left hemisphere lateralization, inferior frontal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, cerebellum, speech perception, speech production, auditory imagery
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Speech, Verbal Behavior, Models, Statistical, Echo-Planar Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review