Multistable representation of speech forms: a functional MRI study of verbal transformations.
Abstract
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to localize the brain areas involved in the imagery analogue of the verbal transformation effect, that is, the perceptual changes that occur when a speech form is cycled in rapid and continuous mental repetition. Two conditions were contrasted: a baseline condition involving the simple mental repetition of speech sequences, and a verbal transformation condition involving the mental repetition of the same items with an active search for verbal transformation. Our results reveal a predominantly left-lateralized network of cerebral regions activated by the verbal transformation task, similar to the neural network involved in verbal working memory: the left inferior frontal gyrus, the left supramarginal gyrus, the left superior temporal gyrus, the anterior part of the right cingulate cortex, and the cerebellar cortex, bilaterally. Our results strongly suggest that the imagery analogue of the verbal transformation effect, which requires percept analysis, form interpretation, and attentional maintenance of verbal material, relies on a working memory module sharing common components of speech perception and speech production systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Verbal Transformation Effect occurs in a covert mode.
“It has been shown to also occur in a covert mode”
From The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework (2019) · cites this paper as Sato et al., 2004
Cites
The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362342a0 · Cited by 2,230 · see citing works
How Many Subjects Constitute a Study?
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., & Worsley, K. J. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0439 · Cited by 814 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In order to test the potential predictive validity of our results and make inference at the population level, we subsequently proceeded to a random-effect analysis implemented with a two-level procedure (Holmes and Friston, 1998; see also Friston et al., 1999).”
Functional anatomy of inner speech and auditory verbal imagery
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A., Murray, R. M., David, A. S., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1996) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700033699 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Wildgruber, D., Ackermann, H., & Grodd, W. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0672 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
The role of subvocalization in auditory imagery.
Smith, J. D., Wilson, M., & Reisberg, D. (1995) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00074-d · Cited by 163 · see citing works
“Enacted” auditory images are ambiguous; “pure” auditory images are not.
Reisberg, D., Smith, J. D., Baxter, D. A., & Sonenshine, M. (1989) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640748908402385 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grandchamp, R., Rapin, L., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Pichat, C., Haldin, C., Cousin, E., Lachaux, J.-P., Dohen, M., Perrier, P., Garnier, M., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02019 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman single neuron activity precedes emergence of conscious perception
Gelbard-Sagiv, H., Mudrik, L., Hill, M. R., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03749-0 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A penny for your thoughts: children’s inner speech and its neuro-development
Geva, S., & Fernyhough, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01708 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sato, M., Baciu, M., Lœvenbruck, H., Schwartz, J.-L., Cathiard, M.-A., Segebarth, C., & Abry, C.
- Affiliations
- Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
- Université Pierre Mendès France (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Sato, Marc
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1143-1151
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154646990
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- speech imagery, verbal working memory, left hemisphere lateralization, inferior frontal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, cerebellum, speech perception, speech production, auditory imagery
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Speech, Verbal Behavior, Models, Statistical, Echo-Planar Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review