Cited by 206Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchMotor Control and Adaptation

Differential contributions of motor cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum to speech motor control: effects of syllable repetition rate evaluated by fMRI

Wildgruber, D., Ackermann, H., Grodd, W.·2001·NeuroImage

Abstract

In order to delineate the neuroanatomical correlates of speech motor control, functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed during silent repetitions of the syllable "ta" at three different rates (2.5, 4.0, and 5.5 Hz). Spatial extent and magnitude of hemodynamic responses at the level of the motor cortex showed a positive correlation to production frequencies. As concerns the basal ganglia, the lower rates (2.5 and 4.0 Hz) gave rise to higher magnitudes of activation within the left putamen as compared to the 5.5 Hz condition. In contrast, cerebellar responses were rather restricted to fast performance (4.0 and 5.5 Hz) and exhibited a shift in caudal direction during 5.5 as compared to 4.0 Hz. These findings corroborate the suggestion of a differential impact of various cortical and subcortical areas on speech motor control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.2000.0672

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wildgruber, D., Ackermann, H., & Grodd, W.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
101-109
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053214069
Cited by
206
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
speech motor control, motor cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum, putamen, silent speech, hemodynamic response, neuroanatomical correlates
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Ganglia, Cerebellum, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Psychomotor Performance, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review