Cited by 66Neuroscience and Music PerceptionMultisensory perception and integrationHallucinations in medical conditions

“Enacted” auditory images are ambiguous; “pure” auditory images are not.

Reisberg, Daniel, Smith, J. David, Baxter, David A., Sonenshine, Marcia·1989·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A

Abstract

Previous research indicates that visual images are inherently unambiguous. The present study extends this argument to auditory imagery. In Experiment 1, subjects were able to reinterpret an imaged ambiguous auditory figure, but covert subvocalization apparently aided this reinterpretation. When subvocalization was blocked, reinterpretations were eliminated. Experiments 2 and 3 generalize this finding to different procedures and stimuli. Experiment 4 explores further the role of subvocalization, by showing that the likelihood of reinterpreting an imaged stimulus is directly proportional to the degree of enactment allowed. We argue that subvocalization or enactment provides an internal stimulus that is subject to reinterpretation. Without enactment, the "pure" auditory image is as unambiguous as a visual image. Thus, in both visual and auditory modalities, images come into being as representations and so are inherently meaningful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14640748908402385

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reisberg, D., Smith, J. D., Baxter, D. A., & Sonenshine, M.
Affiliations
  • Reed College (US)
  • The New School (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
Published
1989-08
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
619-641
ISSN
  • 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0740
OpenAlex
W1974238450
Cited by
66
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
auditory imagery, image ambiguity, reinterpretation, subvocalization, enactment, ambiguous figures, visual imagery
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Humans, Imagination, Semantics, Speech Perception, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review