CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 392Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Music PerceptionFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion and attention interactions in social cognition: Brain regions involved in processing anger prosody

Open access
Sander, David, Grandjean, Didier, Pourtois, Gilles, Schwartz, Sophie, Seghier, Mohamed L., Scherer, Klaus R., Vuilleumier, Patrik·2005·NeuroImage
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.023
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Multiple levels of processing are thought to be involved in the appraisal of emotionally relevant events, with some processes being engaged relatively independently of attention, whereas other processes may depend on attention and current task goals or context. We conducted an event-related fMRI experiment to examine how processing angry voice prosody, an affectively and socially salient signal, is modulated by voluntary attention. To manipulate attention orthogonally to emotional prosody, we used a dichotic listening paradigm in which meaningless utterances, pronounced with either angry or neutral prosody, were presented simultaneously to both ears on each trial. In two successive blocks, participants selectively attended to either the left or right ear and performed a gender-decision on the voice heard on the target side. Our results revealed a functional dissociation between different brain areas. Whereas the right amygdala and bilateral superior temporal sulcus responded to anger prosody irrespective of whether it was heard from a to-be-attended or to-be-ignored voice, the orbitofrontal cortex and the cuneus in medial occipital cortex showed greater activation to the same emotional stimuli when the angry voice was to-be-attended rather than to-be-ignored. Furthermore, regression analyses revealed a strong correlation between orbitofrontal regions and sensitivity on a behavioral inhibition scale measuring proneness to anxiety reactions. Our results underscore the importanc…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.023

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 101 references

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–391 of 391

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sander, D., Grandjean, D., Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M. L., Scherer, K. R., & Vuilleumier, P.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Sander, David
ORCID
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
848-858
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.023
OpenAlex
W2131214576
Cited by
392
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
voice emotion perception, dichotic listening, voluntary attention, amygdala, superior temporal sulcus, orbitofrontal cortex, cuneus, anxiety proneness, social cognition, emotional appraisal, individual differences
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Amygdala, Anger, Anxiety, Attention, Auditory Cortex, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Dichotic Listening Tests, Emotions, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review