Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty

Open access
Jacobsen, Thomas, Schubotz, Ricarda I., Höfel, Lea, Cramon, D. Yves v.·2006·NeuroImage

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Eisenman, 1967, Complexity-simplicity: I. Preference for symmetry and rejection of complexity, Psychon. Sci., 8, 169, 10.3758/BF03331603 · doi:10.3758/bf03331603
  2. Kant, I., 1764. Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen. Königsberg. Translation J.T. Goldthwait, Observations on the feeling of the beautiful and sublime. Berkeley and Los Angeles, Univ California Press.

Cited by

See all 591

Metadata

Authors
Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R. I., Höfel, L., & Cramon, D. Y. V.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
276-285
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064478821
Cited by
591
References
65
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (JA1009/8-1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010
The paper
Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R. I., Höfel, L., & Cramon, D. Y. V. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.