The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a new automated procedure for lesion identification from single images based on the detection of outlier voxels. We demonstrate the utility of this procedure using artificial and real lesions. The scheme rests on two innovations: First, we augment the generative model used for combined segmentation and normalization of images, with an empirical prior for an atypical tissue class, which can be optimised iteratively. Second, we adopt a fuzzy clustering procedure to identify outlier voxels in normalised gray and white matter segments. These two advances suppress misclassification of voxels and restrict lesion identification to gray/white matter lesions respectively. Our analyses show a high sensitivity for detecting and delineating brain lesions with different sizes, locations, and textures. Our approach has important implications for the generation of lesion overlap maps of a given population and the assessment of lesion-deficit mappings. From a clinical perspective, our method should help to compute the total volume of lesion or to trace precisely lesion boundaries that might be pertinent for surgical or diagnostic purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping
Bates, E., Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. F. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1050 · Cited by 1,457
Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension
Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin, R. D., Redfern, B. B., & Jaeger, J. J. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002 · Cited by 1,035
Distributional assumptions in voxel-based morphometry
Salmond, C. H., Ashburner, J., Vargha-Khadem, F., Connelly, A., Gadian, D. G., & Friston, K. J. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1153 · Cited by 256
Cited by
The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS)
Menze, B. H., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Farahani, K., Kirby, J., Burren, Y., Porz, N., Slotboom, J., Wiest, R., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2377694 · Cited by 6,781
Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images
Hope, T. M. H., Seghier, M. L., Leff, A. P., & Price, C. J. (2013) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.005 · Cited by 243
Self-citationDamage to Broca’s area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke
Gajardo-Vidal, A., Lorca-Puls, D. L., team, P., Warner, H., Pshdary, B., Crinion, J. T., Leff, A. P., Hope, T. M. H., Geva, S., Seghier, M. L., et al. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa460 · Cited by 150
Self-citationGriffis, J. C., Allendorfer, J. B., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.019 · Cited by 154
Classifiers for Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: A Comparison Study
Maier, O., Schröder, C., Forkert, N. D., Martinetz, T., & Handels, H. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145118 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Seghier, M. L., Ramlackhansingh, A., Crinion, J., Leff, A. P., & Price, C. J.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1253-1266
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139656398
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.028
- The paper
- Seghier, M. L., Ramlackhansingh, A., Crinion, J., Leff, A. P., & Price, C. J. (2008). Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.