Cited by 103Coffee research and impactsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Caffeine dose effect on activation-induced BOLD and CBF responses

Open access
Chen, Yufen, Parrish, Todd B.·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

Caffeine is a popular psychostimulant, typically found in beverages. While low to intermediate doses of caffeine are associated with positive feelings and increased mental performance and alertness, high doses induce negative feelings such as insomnia, anxiety and nervousness. We investigate if this nonlinear dose-response is present for caffeine's effects on functional activation. Twenty-seven healthy subjects were assigned randomly to four different groups: saline, 1 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg doses of caffeine. Simultaneous ASL/BOLD timeseries were collected both before and after an intravenous infusion of saline or caffeine and the task-induced CBF and BOLD percent changes were compared. The maximum increase in BOLD response was associated with the intermediate caffeine dose of 2.5 mg/kg, which increased BOLD response by 32.2% and 32.5% in motor and visual areas respectively. The maximum increase in CBF response was associated with the highest caffeine dose of 5 mg/kg. This difference could be related to a different density of A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors in the brain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A linear dose relationship exists between reductions in CBF and caffeine following doses of 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg caffeine.

    “A linear dose relationship has been observed between reductions in CBF and caffeine following doses of 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg caffeine (Chen and Parrish 2009a).”

    From A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Effects of Caffeine and L-Theanine Both Alone and in Combination on Cerebral Blood Flow, Cognition and Mood (2015) · cites this paper as Chen and Parrish 2009a

    The Results report that resting CBF fell by 22%, 25%, and 32% after 1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg caffeine, respectively, and the Discussion calls these decreases dose-dependent. The paper describes a linear trend for task-induced CBF responses, but does not establish that the reductions in resting CBF have a linear dose relationship. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bauer, 2003, In vivo imaging of adenosine A1 receptors in the human brain with [18F]CPFPX and positron emission tomography, NeuroImage, 19, 1760, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00241-6 · DOI
  2. Behzadi, 2005, An arteriolar compliance model of the cerebral blood flow response to neural stimulus, NeuroImage, 25, 1100, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.057 · DOI
  3. Bendlin, 2007, Caffeine attenuates practice effects in word stem completion as measured by fMRI BOLD signal, Hum. Brain Mapp., 28, 654, 10.1002/hbm.20295 · DOI
  4. Cameron, 1990, Caffeine and human cerebral blood flow: a positron emission tomography study, Life Sci., 47, 1141, 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90174-P · DOI
  5. Chen, 1999, A(2A) adenosine receptor deficiency attenuates brain injury induced by transient focal ischemia in mice, J. Neurosci., 19, 9192, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-21-09192.1999 · DOI
  6. Dager, 2000, Brain imaging and the effects of caffeine and nicotine, Ann. Med., 32, 592, 10.3109/07853890009002029 · DOI
  7. Dager, 1999, Human brain metabolic response to caffeine and the effects of tolerance, Am. J. Psychiatry, 156, 229, 10.1176/ajp.156.2.229 · DOI
  8. Daly, 1998, Caffeine—an atypical drug of dependence, Drug Alcohol Depend., 51, 199, 10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00077-5 · DOI
  9. Field, 2003, Dietary caffeine consumption and withdrawal: confounding variables in quantitative cerebral perfusion studies?, Radiology, 227, 129, 10.1148/radiol.2271012173 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kaplan, 1993, Caffeine treatment and withdrawal in mice: relationships between dosage, concentrations, locomotor activity and A1 adenosine receptor binding, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 266, 1563, 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)39453-X · DOI
  11. Kaplan, 1997, Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and psychomotor effects of caffeine in humans, J. Clin. Pharmacol., 37, 693, 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04356.x · DOI
  12. Koppelstaetter, 2008, Does caffeine modulate verbal working memory processes? An fMRI study, NeuroImage, 39, 492, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.037 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Laurienti, 2003, Relationship between caffeine-induced changes in resting cerebral perfusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent signal, AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 24, 1607
  14. Li, 2002, How can we make BOLD contrast bolder?, AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 23, 507
  15. Liau, 2008, Caffeine reduces the activation extent and contrast-to-noise ratio of the functional cerebral blood flow response but not the BOLD response, NeuroImage, 42, 296, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.177 · DOI
  16. Liu, 2004, Caffeine alters the temporal dynamics of the visual BOLD response, NeuroImage, 23, 1402, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.061 · DOI
  17. Luh, 1999, QUIPSS II with thin-slice TI1 periodic saturation: a method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling, Magn. Reson. Med., 41, 1246, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1246::AID-MRM22>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  18. Luh, 2000, Comparison of simultaneously measured perfusion and BOLD signal increases during brain activation with T(1)-based tissue identification, Magn. Reson. Med., 44, 137, 10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<137::AID-MRM20>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  19. Mathew, 1985, Caffeine induced changes in cerebral circulation, Stroke, 16, 814, 10.1161/01.STR.16.5.814 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Morton, 2002, Systemic theophylline augments the blood oxygen level-dependent response to forepaw stimulation in rats, AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 23, 588
  21. Nehlig, 2000, Dose–response study of caffeine effects on cerebral functional activity with a specific focus on dependence, Brain Res., 858, 71, 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)02480-4 · DOI
  22. Ongini, 1997, Adenosine A2A receptors and neuroprotection, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 825, 30, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48412.x · DOI
  23. Perthen, 2008, Caffeine-induced uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism: a calibrated BOLD fMRI study, NeuroImage, 40, 237, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.049 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Varani, 2000, Dose and time effects of caffeine intake on human platelet adenosine A(2A) receptors: functional and biochemical aspects, Circulation, 102, 285, 10.1161/01.CIR.102.3.285 · DOI
  25. Wang, 2005, To smooth or not to smooth? ROC analysis of perfusion fMRI data, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 23, 75, 10.1016/j.mri.2004.11.009 · DOI
  26. Wong, 1997, Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling, NMR Biomed., 10, 237, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199706/08)10:4/5<237::AID-NBM475>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., & Parrish, T. B.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Parrish, Todd B.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
577-583
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015511270
Cited by
103
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB002449)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
caffeine, dose-response relationship, BOLD signal, cerebral blood flow, adenosine A1 receptor, adenosine A2A receptor, psychostimulants, functional brain activation, motor cortex, visual cortex, arterial spin labeling
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Blood Flow Velocity, Brain Mapping, Caffeine, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review