Cited by 402Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesStress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 177 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain mediators of cardiovascular responses to social threat

Open access

Abstract

Social threat is a key component of mental "stress" and a potent generator of negative emotions and physiological responses in the body. How the human brain processes social context and drives peripheral physiology, however, is relatively poorly understood. Human neuroimaging and animal studies implicate the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), though this heterogeneous region is likely to contain multiple sub-regions with diverse relationships with physiological reactivity and regulation. We used fMRI combined with a novel multi-level path analysis approach to identify brain mediators of the effects of a public speech preparation task (social evaluative threat, SET) on heart rate (HR). This model provides tests of functional pathways linking experimentally manipulated threat, regional fMRI activity, and physiological output, both across time (within person) and across individuals (between persons). It thus integrates time series connectivity and individual difference analyses in the same path model. The results provide evidence for two dissociable, inversely coupled sub-regions of MPFC that independently mediated HR responses. SET caused activity increases in a more dorsal pregenual cingulate region, whose activity was coupled with HR increases. Conversely, SET caused activity decreases in a right ventromedial/medial orbital region, which were coupled with HR increases. Individual differences in coupling strength in each pathway independently predicted individual differences in HR reactivity. These results underscore both the importance and heterogeneity of MPFC in generating physiological responses to threat.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.043

Cites

177 of 177 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 180 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Critchley, 2003, Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence, Brain, 126, 2139, 10.1093/brain/awg216 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Gianaros, 2008, Individual differences in stressor-evoked blood pressure reactivity vary with activation, volume, and functional connectivity of the amygdala, J. Neurosci., 28, 990, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3606-07.2008 · DOI
  3. Wager, 2009, Brain mediators of cardiovascular responses to social threat, Part I: Reciprocal dorsal and ventral sub-regions of the medial prefrontal cortex and heart-rate reactivity, Neuroimage, 47, 821, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.043
  4. Waugh, 2008, Cardiovascular recovery from anticipated negative experiences that never occur, Psychophysiology, 45, S83

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 401

Metadata

Authors
Wager, T. D., Waugh, C. E., Lindquist, M., Noll, D. C., Fredrickson, B. L., & Taylor, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Wager, Tor D.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
821-835
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103729454
Cited by
402
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 59615, R01MH059615, MH076136, R01MH076136, R37MH076136)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
social danger, social-evaluative threat, heart rate reactivity, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, heart-brain interaction, individual differences, cardiovascular response
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Speech, Stress, Psychological, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review