Cited by 312Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMusic History and Culture

Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music

Open access
Berns, Gregory S., Capra, C. Monica, Moore, Sara, Noussair, Charles·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

It is well-known that social influences affect consumption decisions. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate the neural mechanisms associated with social influence with regard to a common consumer good: music. Our study population was adolescents, age 12-17. Music is a common purchase in this age group, and it is widely believed that adolescent behavior is influenced by perceptions of popularity in their reference group. Using 15-s clips of songs from MySpace.com, we obtained behavioral measures of preferences and neurobiological responses to the songs. The data were gathered with, and without, the overall popularity of the song revealed. Song popularity had a significant effect on the participants' likability ratings of the songs. fMRI results showed a strong correlation between the participants' rating and activity in the caudate nucleus, a region previously implicated in reward-driven actions. The tendency to change one's evaluation of a song was positively correlated with activation in the anterior insula and anterior cingulate, two regions that are associated with physiological arousal and negative affective states. Sensitivity to popularity was linked to lower activation levels in the middle temporal gyrus, suggesting a lower depth of musical semantic processing. Our results suggest that a principal mechanism whereby popularity ratings affect consumer choice is through the anxiety generated by the mismatch between one's own preferences and others'. This mismatch anxiety motivates people to switch their choices in the direction of the consensus. Our data suggest that this is a major force behind the conformity observed in music tastes in some teenagers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.070

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decades of conformity experiments demonstrate that individuals' behaviors, preferences, and beliefs can be swayed by their peers in domains as wide-ranging as visual perception, inferences about socially normative behaviors, intensity of pain experience, preferences for food and music, and the attractiveness of faces.

    “Decades of conformity experiments demonstrate that individuals’ behaviors, preferences, and beliefs can be swayed by their peers in domains as wide-ranging as visual perception, inferences about socially normative behaviors, intensity of pain experience, preferences for food and music, and the attractiveness of faces 1 – 7 .”

    From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results (‘Individual Ratings and Social Influence’; page not available) show that popularity information shifted adolescents’ music ratings toward the group rating. But the Discussion says the findings suggest popularity ratings did not affect adolescents’ underlying music preferences. The source therefore supports an effect on expressed ratings, not the claimed effect on music preferences. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The popularity rankings of a given song influence how much adolescents like it.

    “The popularity rankings of a given song influence how much adolescents like it (Berns et al. 2010).”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Berns et al. 2010

  • In adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, change in song evaluation after receiving popularity ranking correlated with increased recruitment of anterior insula and ACC.

    “Adolescents' change in song evaluation correlated with increased recruitment of the anterior insula and ACC, which the authors suggest may reflect the anxiety of having preferences that are dissimilar to those of others.”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Berns et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 312

Authors
Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S., & Noussair, C.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Berns, Gregory S.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
2687-2696
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160480425
Cited by
312
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016434, R01DA020116)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
Keywords
social influence, popularity, music preference, adolescents, consumer choice, caudate nucleus, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, middle temporal gyrus, conformity, music consumption, reward
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Music, Neurons, Social Conformity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review