Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music
Open accessAbstract
It is well-known that social influences affect consumption decisions. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate the neural mechanisms associated with social influence with regard to a common consumer good: music. Our study population was adolescents, age 12-17. Music is a common purchase in this age group, and it is widely believed that adolescent behavior is influenced by perceptions of popularity in their reference group. Using 15-s clips of songs from MySpace.com, we obtained behavioral measures of preferences and neurobiological responses to the songs. The data were gathered with, and without, the overall popularity of the song revealed. Song popularity had a significant effect on the participants' likability ratings of the songs. fMRI results showed a strong correlation between the participants' rating and activity in the caudate nucleus, a region previously implicated in reward-driven actions. The tendency to change one's evaluation of a song was positively correlated with activation in the anterior insula and anterior cingulate, two regions that are associated with physiological arousal and negative affective states. Sensitivity to popularity was linked to lower activation levels in the middle temporal gyrus, suggesting a lower depth of musical semantic processing. Our results suggest that a principal mechanism whereby popularity ratings affect consumer choice is through the anxiety generated by the mismatch between one's own preferences and others'. This mismatch anxiety motivates people to switch their choices in the direction of the consensus. Our data suggest that this is a major force behind the conformity observed in music tastes in some teenagers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decades of conformity experiments demonstrate that individuals' behaviors, preferences, and beliefs can be swayed by their peers in domains as wide-ranging as visual perception, inferences about socially normative behaviors, intensity of pain experience, preferences for food and music, and the attractiveness of faces.
“Decades of conformity experiments demonstrate that individuals’ behaviors, preferences, and beliefs can be swayed by their peers in domains as wide-ranging as visual perception, inferences about socially normative behaviors, intensity of pain experience, preferences for food and music, and the attractiveness of faces 1 – 7 .”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
The Results (‘Individual Ratings and Social Influence’; page not available) show that popularity information shifted adolescents’ music ratings toward the group rating. But the Discussion says the findings suggest popularity ratings did not affect adolescents’ underlying music preferences. The source therefore supports an effect on expressed ratings, not the claimed effect on music preferences. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe popularity rankings of a given song influence how much adolescents like it.
“The popularity rankings of a given song influence how much adolescents like it (Berns et al. 2010).”
From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Berns et al. 2010
In adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, change in song evaluation after receiving popularity ranking correlated with increased recruitment of anterior insula and ACC.
“Adolescents' change in song evaluation correlated with increased recruitment of the anterior insula and ACC, which the authors suggest may reflect the anxiety of having preferences that are dissimilar to those of others.”
From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Berns et al. 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 312
- Authors
- Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S., & Noussair, C.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berns, Gregory S.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2687-2696
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2818406
- OpenAlex
- W2160480425
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016434, R01DA020116)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
- Keywords
- social influence, popularity, music preference, adolescents, consumer choice, caudate nucleus, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, middle temporal gyrus, conformity, music consumption, reward
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Music, Neurons, Social Conformity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review