The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning
Open accessAbstract
Investigations into action monitoring have consistently detailed a fronto-central voltage deflection in the Event-Related Potential (ERP) following the presentation of negatively valenced feedback, sometimes termed the Feedback Related Negativity (FRN). The FRN has been proposed to reflect a neural response to prediction errors during reinforcement learning, yet the single trial relationship between neural activity and the quanta of expectation violation remains untested. Although ERP methods are not well suited to single trial analyses, the FRN has been associated with theta band oscillatory perturbations in the medial prefrontal cortex. Medio-frontal theta oscillations have been previously associated with expectation violation and behavioral adaptation and are well suited to single trial analysis. Here, we recorded EEG activity during a probabilistic reinforcement learning task and fit the performance data to an abstract computational model (Q-learning) for calculation of single-trial reward prediction errors. Single-trial theta oscillatory activities following feedback were investigated within the context of expectation (prediction error) and adaptation (subsequent reaction time change). Results indicate that interactive medial and lateral frontal theta activities reflect the degree of negative and positive reward prediction error in the service of behavioral adaptation. These different brain areas use prediction error calculations for different behavioral adaptations: with medial frontal theta reflecting the utilization of prediction errors for reaction time slowing (specifically following errors), but lateral frontal theta reflecting prediction errors leading to working memory-related reaction time speeding for the correct choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
(2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 24,496
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992698 · Cited by 9,083
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Buzsáki, G. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001 · Cited by 4,873
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.
Fries, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011 · Cited by 4,284
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022676722315 · Cited by 3,907
Cited by
Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control
Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012 · Cited by 2,726
Self-citationTheta lingua franca: A common mid‐frontal substrate for action monitoring processes
Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano‐Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x · Cited by 651
Self-citationFrontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence
Cavanagh, J. F., & Shackman, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.003 · Cited by 623
Self-citationFrontal theta activity reflects distinct aspects of mental fatigue
Wascher, E., Rasch, B., Sänger, J., Hoffmann, S., Schneider, D., Rinkenauer, G., Heuer, H., & Gutberlet, I. (2014) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.010 · Cited by 454
Collins, A. G. E., & Frank, M. J. (2012) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07980.x · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavanagh, J. F., Frank, M. J., Klein, T. J., & Allen, J. J. B.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3198-3209
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150643588
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.080
- The paper
- Cavanagh, J. F., Frank, M. J., Klein, T. J., & Allen, J. J. B. (2010). Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.